8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Clinical and Economic Burden of Hyperkalemia on Medicare and Commercial Payers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.0 mEq/L) may be caused by reduced kidney function and drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and is often present in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

          Objective

          To quantify the burden of hyperkalemia in US Medicare fee-for-service and commercially insured populations using real-world claims data, focusing on prevalence, comorbidities, mortality, medical utilization, and cost.

          Methods

          A descriptive, retrospective claims data analysis was performed on patients with hyperkalemia using the 2014 Medicare 5% sample and the 2014 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter databases. The starting study samples required patient insurance eligibility during ≥1 months in 2014. The identification of hyperkalemia and other comorbidities required having ≥1 qualifying claims in 2014 with an appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code in any position. To address the differences between patients with and without hyperkalemia, CKD subsamples were analyzed separately. Mortality rates were calculated in the Medicare sample population only. The claims were grouped into major service categories; the allowed costs reflected all costs incurred by each cohort divided by the total number of member months for that cohort.

          Results

          The prevalence of hyperkalemia in the Medicare and commercially insured samples was 2.3% and 0.09%, respectively. Hyperkalemia was associated with multiple comorbidities, most notably CKD. The prevalence of CKD in the Medicare and the commercially insured members with hyperkalemia was 64.8% and 31.8%, respectively. After adjusting for CKD severity, the annual mortality rate for Medicare patients with CKD and hyperkalemia was 24.9% versus 10.4% in patients with CKD without hyperkalemia. The allowed costs in patients with CKD and hyperkalemia in the Medicare and commercially insured cohorts were more than twice those in patients with CKD without hyperkalemia. Inpatient care accounted for >50% of costs in patients with CKD and hyperkalemia.

          Conclusion

          Hyperkalemia is associated with substantial clinical and economic burden among US commercially insured and Medicare populations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Am Health Drug Benefits
          Am Health Drug Benefits
          ahdb
          American Health & Drug Benefits
          Engage Healthcare Communications, LLC
          1942-2962
          1942-2970
          June 2017
          : 10
          : 4
          : 202-210
          Affiliations
          Principal, Milliman, New York, NY
          Executive Director, ZS Pharma, San Mateo, CA
          Associate Actuary, Milliman
          Principal, Milliman
          Article
          PMC5536196 PMC5536196 5536196 ahdb-10-202
          5536196
          28794824
          b3ace6dd-4442-4953-9453-c74a336a6b97
          Copyright © 2017 by Engage Healthcare Communications, LLC
          History
          : 22 September 2016
          : 20 March 2017
          Page count
          Figures: 5, Tables: 2, References: 31, Pages: 9, Words: 4900
          Categories
          Business
          Original Research

          chronic kidney disease,commercially insured,comorbidities,cost,fee for service,hyperkalemia,Medicare,mortality,prevalence,utilization

          Comments

          Comment on this article