29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Equity and vaccine uptake: a cross-sectional study of measles vaccination in Lasbela District, Pakistan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Achieving equity means increased uptake of health services for those who need it most. But the poorest families continue to have the poorest service. In Pakistan, large numbers of children do not access vaccination against measles despite the national government's effort to achieve universal coverage.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional study of a random sample of 23 rural and 9 urban communities in the Lasbela district of south Pakistan, explored knowledge, attitudes and discussion around measles vaccination. Several socioeconomic variables allowed examination of the role of inequities in vaccination uptake; 2479 mothers provided information about 4007 children aged 10 to 59 months. A Mantel-Haenszel stratification analysis, with and without adjustment for clustering, clarified determinants of measles vaccination in urban and rural areas.

          Results

          A high proportion of mothers had appropriate knowledge of and positive attitudes to vaccination; many discussed vaccination, but only one half of children aged 10-59 months accessed vaccination. In urban areas, having an educated mother, discussing vaccinations, having correct knowledge about vaccinations, living in a community with a government vaccination facility within 5 km, and living in houses with better roofs were associated with vaccination uptake after adjusting for the effect of each of these variables and for clustering; maternal education was an equity factor even among those with good access. In rural areas, the combination of roof quality and access (vaccination post within 5 km) along with discussion about vaccines and knowledge about vaccines had an effect on uptake.

          Conclusion

          Stagnating rates of vaccination coverage may be related to increasing inequities. A hopeful finding is that discussion about vaccines and knowledge about vaccines had a positive effect that was independent of the negative effect of inequity - in both urban and rural areas. At least as a short term strategy, there seems to be reason to expect an intervention increasing knowledge and discussion about vaccination in this district might increase uptake.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A glossary for health inequalities.

          In this glossary, the authors address eight key questions pertinent to health inequalities: (1) What is the distinction between health inequality and health inequity?; (2) Should we assess health inequalities themselves, or social group inequalities in health?; (3) Do health inequalities mainly reflect the effects of poverty, or are they generated by the socioeconomic gradient?; (4) Are health inequalities mediated by material deprivation or by psychosocial mechanisms?; (5) Is there an effect of relative income on health, separate from the effects of absolute income?; (6) Do health inequalities between places simply reflect health inequalities between social groups or, more significantly, do they suggest a contextual effect of place?; (7) What is the contribution of the lifecourse to health inequalities?; (8) What kinds of inequality should we study?
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Equity and health sector reforms: can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Chi-Square Tests with One Degree of Freedom; Extensions of the Mantel- Haenszel Procedure

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Int Health Hum Rights
                BMC International Health and Human Rights
                BioMed Central
                1472-698X
                2009
                14 October 2009
                : 9
                : Suppl 1
                : S7
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CIETcanada, 1 Stewart Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, México
                [3 ]CIET in Pakistan, House 226, Block 18, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, Pakistan
                Article
                1472-698X-9-S1-S7
                10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S7
                3226239
                19828065
                b3e6581f-79d8-4364-8bce-d8c1f48abbfa
                Copyright ©2009 Mitchell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in aided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Research

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article