Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Infrapopliteal Lesions: Results from the Disrupt PAD III Observational Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave S 4 intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) catheter in an “all-comers” cohort of patients with calcified infrapopliteal lesions.

          Materials and Methods:

          The Disrupt PAD III Observational Study (NCT02923193) is a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter single-arm study designed to assess the “real-world” acute safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Peripheral IVL System for the treatment of de novo calcified, stenotic peripheral arteries. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they had claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI) and at least moderate calcification as assessed by angiography. This subanalysis includes consecutive patients enrolled with angiographic core lab-assessed treatment of infrapopliteal arteries using the Shockwave S 4 IVL catheter.

          Results

          From July 2018 to August 2020, 101 patients with 114 calcified infrapopliteal arteries treated with the S 4 IVL catheter were enrolled at 15 sites in 3 countries. CLI was present in 69.3% of patients. The anterior tibial and tiboperoneal trunk were the most commonly treated vessels with an overall mean reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 3.1±0.8 mm, minimum lumen diameter (MLD) of 0.5±0.6 mm, and a corresponding diameter stenosis of 83.4%±15.8% by core lab assessment. Mean lesion length was 64.7±54.7 mm with moderate to severe calcification in 69.3% of lesions by the Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC) criteria. Adjunctive calcium-modifying technology, defined as scoring or cutting balloon and/or atherectomy, was used in 22.7% of procedures. The average acute gain at the end of the procedure was 2.0±0.7 mm with a residual stenosis <50% achieved in 99.0% of lesions and a mean residual stenosis of 23.3±12.5%. There were no flow-limiting dissection, embolization, slow flow/no-reflow, or abrupt closure events at the end of the procedure.

          Conclusion

          This subanalysis of the PAD III Observational Study represents the largest report to-date of IVL treatment of heavily calcified below-the-knee (BTK) lesions in a “real-world” patient cohort. The use of S 4 IVL demonstrated consistent acute safety and effectiveness outcomes consistent with prior IVL peripheral studies. These consistent outcomes were achieved with the initial use of the S 4 IVL catheter for treatment of complex BTK lesions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI).

          Critical limb ischemia, first defined in 1982, was intended to delineate a subgroup of patients with a threatened lower extremity primarily because of chronic ischemia. It was the intent of the original authors that patients with diabetes be excluded or analyzed separately. The Fontaine and Rutherford Systems have been used to classify risk of amputation and likelihood of benefit from revascularization by subcategorizing patients into two groups: ischemic rest pain and tissue loss. Due to demographic shifts over the last 40 years, especially a dramatic rise in the incidence of diabetes mellitus and rapidly expanding techniques of revascularization, it has become increasingly difficult to perform meaningful outcomes analysis for patients with threatened limbs using these existing classification systems. Particularly in patients with diabetes, limb threat is part of a broad disease spectrum. Perfusion is only one determinant of outcome; wound extent and the presence and severity of infection also greatly impact the threat to a limb. Therefore, the Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Guidelines Committee undertook the task of creating a new classification of the threatened lower extremity that reflects these important considerations. We term this new framework, the Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System. Risk stratification is based on three major factors that impact amputation risk and clinical management: Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). The implementation of this classification system is intended to permit more meaningful analysis of outcomes for various forms of therapy in this challenging, but heterogeneous population.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Peripheral arterial calcification: Prevalence, mechanism, detection, and clinical implications

            Vascular calcification (VC), particularly medial (Mönckeberg's medial sclerosis) arterial calcification, is common in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and genetic pathways of VC are not fully known, hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and the suppression of parathyroid hormone activity are central to the development of vessel mineralization and, consequently, bone demineralization. In addition to preventive measures, such as the modification of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk factors, current treatment strategies include the use of calcium-free phosphate binders, vitamin D analogs, and calcium mimetics that have shown promising results, albeit in small patient cohorts. The impact of intimal and medial VC on the safety and effectiveness of endovascular devices to treat symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains poorly defined. The absence of a generally accepted, validated vascular calcium grading scale hampers clinical progress in assessing the safety and utility of various endovascular devices (e.g., atherectomy) in treating calcified vessels. Accordingly, we propose the peripheral arterial calcium scoring system (PACSS) and a method for its clinical validation. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of vascular calcification and the development of optimal medical and endovascular treatment strategies are crucial as the population ages and presents with more chronic comorbidities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Calcium burden assessment and impact on drug-eluting balloons in peripheral arterial disease.

              This study was designed to assess the effect of calcium on the efficacy of DEB during revascularization of steno-obstructive SFA lesions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Endovascular Therapy
                J Endovasc Ther
                SAGE Publications
                1526-6028
                1545-1550
                February 2022
                August 12 2021
                February 2022
                : 29
                : 1
                : 76-83
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiology, North Carolina Heart and Vascular, Rex Hospital, UNC School of Medicine, Raleigh, NC, USA
                [2 ]Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
                [3 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
                [4 ]Cardiology Associates Research, LLC, North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, MS, USA
                [5 ]Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
                Article
                10.1177/15266028211032953
                34380334
                b40635aa-483f-4876-9e61-e3e2a5395ba9
                © 2022

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article