Unveiling the Impact of Gaslighting on Female Academic Leadership: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study

Abstract

Gaslighting is a psychological manipulation phenomenon that makes people doubt their own perception and sanity. In light of the prevalence of women in academia, this may have profound effects on academic leadership. Gaslighting is a common problem for women in academic leadership that can be harmful to their mental well-being and ability to develop in their careers. This phenomenon may lead to physical health effects, psychological and emotional stress, work-life balance issues, professional setbacks, low self-esteem, loss of confidence, and low self-efficacy. This study adopted a qualitative phenomenological research design with purposive sampling. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 mid-career female academic leaders working in two public sector universities in Punjab. Research ethical guidelines were followed by obtaining the informed consent of the participants and keeping their identities confidential. Transcribed data was analyzed through thematic analysis while adopting the IPA (interpretative phenomenological analysis) model. The study provided insights into the causes of gaslighting at the individual and organizational levels. Furthermore, the psychological, emotional, and professional impacts of gaslighting were explored. Participants suggested remedial measures such as awareness, engagement, social networking, documenting and reporting incidents, professional counselling, and boundary-setting skills that may help female academic leaders face and handle this situation effectively.