4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Water reuse and recycling in Australia — history, current situation and future perspectives

      ,
      Water Cycle
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Potable reuse treatment trains throughout the world

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A review on microbial contaminants in stormwater runoff and outfalls: Potential health risks and mitigation strategies

            Demands on global water supplies are increasing in response to the need to provide more food, water, and energy for a rapidly growing population. These water stressors are exacerbated by climate change, as well as the growth and urbanisation of industry and commerce. Consequently, urban water authorities around the globe are exploring alternative water sources to meet ever-increasing demands. These alternative sources are primarily treated sewage, stormwater, and groundwater. Stormwater including roof-harvested rainwater has been considered as an alternative water source for both potable and non-potable uses. One of the most significant issues concerning alternative water reuse is the public health risk associated with chemical and microbial contaminants. Several studies to date have quantified fecal indicators and pathogens in stormwater. Microbial source tracking (MST) approaches have also been used to determine the sources of fecal contamination in stormwater and receiving waters. This review paper summarizes occurrence and concentrations of fecal indicators, pathogens, and MST marker genes in urban stormwater. A section of the review highlights the removal of fecal indicators and pathogens through water sensitive urban design (WSUD) or Best Management Practices (BMPs). We also discuss approaches for assessing and mitigating health risks associated with stormwater, including a summary of existing quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) models for potable and non-potable reuse of stormwater. Finally, the most critical research gaps are identified for formulating risk management strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Figtree Place: a case study in water sensitive urban development (WSUD)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Water Cycle
                Water Cycle
                Elsevier BV
                26664453
                2020
                2020
                : 1
                : 19-40
                Article
                10.1016/j.watcyc.2020.05.005
                b54d4b67-1909-4655-ae05-d2d67fc97c0d
                © 2020

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article