2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target in Resistant and Non-Resistant Hypertension: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Level Data from SPRINT and ACCORD

      , , , , ,
      The American Journal of Medicine
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d253663e180">Background:</h5> <p id="P2">Prior studies suggest benefits of blood pressure-lowering on cardiovascular risk may be attenuated in resistant hypertension compared to the general hypertensive population, but prospective data are lacking. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d253663e185">Methods:</h5> <p id="P3">We assessed intensive (&lt;120 mmHg) versus standard (&lt;140 mmHg) systolic blood pressure targets on adverse outcome risk according to baseline resistant hypertension status, using Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD-BP) and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) patient-level data. Patients were categorized as having baseline apparent resistant hypertension (blood pressure ≥130/80 mmHg while using 3 antihypertensive drugs or use of ≥4 drugs regardless of blood pressure) or non-resistant hypertension (all others). Cox regression was used to assess effects of treatment assignment, resistant hypertension status, their interaction, and other covariates, on first occurrence of two outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death ± heart failure, and the same outcomes plus all-cause death, individually. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d253663e190">Results:</h5> <p id="P4">Among 14,094 patients, 2,710 (19.2%) had baseline apparent resistant hypertension. In adjusted models, an intensive target reduced risk of both outcomes (myocardial infarction/stroke/cardiovascular death: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71–0.93; myocardial infarction/stroke/heart failure/cardiovascular death: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69–0.88) as well as stroke (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55–0.94) and heart failure (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59–0.91). An intensive target also appeared to reduce myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and all-cause death risk. Benefits were observed irrespective of baseline resistant hypertension status. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d253663e195">Conclusions:</h5> <p id="P5">Our findings provide the first evidence to support guidance to treat resistant hypertension to the same blood pressure goal as non-resistant hypertension. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The American Journal of Medicine
          The American Journal of Medicine
          Elsevier BV
          00029343
          December 2018
          December 2018
          : 131
          : 12
          : 1463-1472.e7
          Article
          10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.08.005
          6279479
          30142317
          b5dc0034-3cb1-40f1-a39c-5e58c537a446
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article