3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Estimates of effective population size and inbreeding in South African indigenous chicken populations: implications for the conservation of unique genetic resources

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Conservation of locally adapted indigenous livestock breeds has become an important objective in sustainable animal breeding, as these breeds represent a unique genetic resource. Therefore, the Agricultural Research Council of South Africa initiated a conservation programme for four South African indigenous chicken breeds. The evaluation and monitoring of the genetic constitution of these conservation flocks is important for proper management of the conservation programme. Using molecular genetic analyses, the effective population sizes and relatedness of these conservation flocks were compared to village (field) chicken populations from which they were derived. Genetic diversity within and between these populations are further discussed within the context of population size. The conservation flocks for the respective breeds had relatively small effective population sizes (point estimate range 38.6–78.6) in comparison to the field populations (point estimate range 118.9–580.0). Furthermore, evidence supports a transient heterozygous excess, generally associated with the occurrence of a recent population bottleneck. Genetic diversity, as measured by the number of alleles, heterozygosity and information index, was also significantly reduced in the conservation flocks. The average relatedness amongst the conservation flocks was high, whilst it remained low for the field populations. There was also significant evidence for population differentiation between field and conservation populations. F st estimates for conservation flocks were moderate to high with a maximum reached between VD_C and VD_F (0.285). However, F st estimates for field population were excessively low between the NN_C and EC_F (0.007) and between EC_F and OV_F (0.009). The significant population differentiation of the conservation flocks from their geographically correlated field populations of origin is further supported by the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), with 10.51 % of genetic diversity ascribed to population differences within groups ( F SC = 0.106). The results suggest that significant genetic erosion has occurred within the conservation flocks due to inbreeding, pronounced effects of random drift and selection. It might be necessary to introduce new breeding individuals from the respective field populations in order to increase the effective population sizes of the conservation flocks and counter the effects of genetic erosion.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11250-016-1030-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.

          M Nei (1978)
          The magnitudes of the systematic biases involved in sample heterozygosity and sample genetic distances are evaluated, and formulae for obtaining unbiased estimates of average heterozygosity and genetic distance are developed. It is also shown that the number of individuals to be used for estimating average heterozygosity can be very small if a large number of loci are studied and the average heterozygosity is low. The number of individuals to be used for estimating genetic distance can also be very small if the genetic distance is large and the average heterozygosity of the two species compared is low.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The origins of genome complexity.

            Complete genomic sequences from diverse phylogenetic lineages reveal notable increases in genome complexity from prokaryotes to multicellular eukaryotes. The changes include gradual increases in gene number, resulting from the retention of duplicate genes, and more abrupt increases in the abundance of spliceosomal introns and mobile genetic elements. We argue that many of these modifications emerged passively in response to the long-term population-size reductions that accompanied increases in organism size. According to this model, much of the restructuring of eukaryotic genomes was initiated by nonadaptive processes, and this in turn provided novel substrates for the secondary evolution of phenotypic complexity by natural selection. The enormous long-term effective population sizes of prokaryotes may impose a substantial barrier to the evolution of complex genomes and morphologies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating Relatedness Using Genetic Markers

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +27 12 382 5983 , mtilenib@tut.ac.za
                Journal
                Trop Anim Health Prod
                Trop Anim Health Prod
                Tropical Animal Health and Production
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0049-4747
                1573-7438
                16 March 2016
                16 March 2016
                2016
                : 48
                : 943-950
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa
                [ ]Department of Animal Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa
                [ ]Department of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa
                Article
                1030
                10.1007/s11250-016-1030-9
                4884205
                26984598
                b5e0f222-5dc9-432c-abbf-21fe069e9fd4
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 21 August 2015
                : 29 February 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001342, Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa (ZA);
                Categories
                Regular Articles
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

                Animal science & Zoology
                conservation,effective population size,genetic diversity,inbreeding,indigenous chickens

                Comments

                Comment on this article