5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Open science approaches to COVID-19

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In only a matter of months, the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has spread around the world. The global impact of the disease has caused significant and repeated calls for quick action towards new medicines and vaccines. In response, researchers have adopted open science methods to begin to combat this disease via global collaborative efforts. We summarise here some of those initiatives, and have created an updateable list to which others may be added. Though open science has previously been shown as an accelerator of biomedical research, the COVID-19 crisis has made openness seem the logical choice. Will openness persist in the discovery of new medicines, after the crisis has receded?

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            How open science helps researchers succeed

            Open access, open data, open source and other open scholarship practices are growing in popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. One reason is that researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers. We review literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities. These findings are evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800.001
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Open Source Drug Discovery with the Malaria Box Compound Collection for Neglected Diseases and Beyond

              A major cause of the paucity of new starting points for drug discovery is the lack of interaction between academia and industry. Much of the global resource in biology is present in universities, whereas the focus of medicinal chemistry is still largely within industry. Open source drug discovery, with sharing of information, is clearly a first step towards overcoming this gap. But the interface could especially be bridged through a scale-up of open sharing of physical compounds, which would accelerate the finding of new starting points for drug discovery. The Medicines for Malaria Venture Malaria Box is a collection of over 400 compounds representing families of structures identified in phenotypic screens of pharmaceutical and academic libraries against the Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite. The set has now been distributed to almost 200 research groups globally in the last two years, with the only stipulation that information from the screens is deposited in the public domain. This paper reports for the first time on 236 screens that have been carried out against the Malaria Box and compares these results with 55 assays that were previously published, in a format that allows a meta-analysis of the combined dataset. The combined biochemical and cellular assays presented here suggest mechanisms of action for 135 (34%) of the compounds active in killing multiple life-cycle stages of the malaria parasite, including asexual blood, liver, gametocyte, gametes and insect ookinete stages. In addition, many compounds demonstrated activity against other pathogens, showing hits in assays with 16 protozoa, 7 helminths, 9 bacterial and mycobacterial species, the dengue fever mosquito vector, and the NCI60 human cancer cell line panel of 60 human tumor cell lines. Toxicological, pharmacokinetic and metabolic properties were collected on all the compounds, assisting in the selection of the most promising candidates for murine proof-of-concept experiments and medicinal chemistry programs. The data for all of these assays are presented and analyzed to show how outstanding leads for many indications can be selected. These results reveal the immense potential for translating the dispersed expertise in biological assays involving human pathogens into drug discovery starting points, by providing open access to new families of molecules, and emphasize how a small additional investment made to help acquire and distribute compounds, and sharing the data, can catalyze drug discovery for dozens of different indications. Another lesson is that when multiple screens from different groups are run on the same library, results can be integrated quickly to select the most valuable starting points for subsequent medicinal chemistry efforts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                F1000Res
                F1000Res
                F1000Research
                F1000Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2046-1402
                25 August 2020
                2020
                : 9
                : 1043
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
                [1 ]Laboratory for Molecular Modeling; UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [1 ]National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9133-9274
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8982-0640
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-4751
                Article
                10.12688/f1000research.26084.1
                7590891
                33145011
                b748f177-b1fb-452b-a5fc-8ee7bcf29939
                Copyright: © 2020 Tse EG et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
                Award ID: EP/S000356/1
                This work was supported by the Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Intelligence for Automated Investigations for Scientific Discovery Network+, which has been funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/S000356/1].
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Review
                Articles

                sars-cov-2,covid-19,open science,open data,open access,open source

                Comments

                Comment on this article