8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of the neuropathology and memory decline induced by monosodium glutamate in the Alzheimer’s disease-like animal model

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic review analyzes monosodium glutamate (MSG) in the Alzheimer’s disease-like condition to enhance translational research. Our review seeks to understand how MSG affects the brain and causes degenerative disorders. Due to significant preclinical data linking glutamate toxicity to Alzheimer’s disease and the lack of a comprehensive review or meta-analysis, we initiated a study on MSG’s potential link. We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, DOAJ, and Scopus for animal research and English language papers without time constraints. This study used the PRISMA-P framework and PICO technique to collect population, intervention or exposure, comparison, and result data. It was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42022371502. MSG affected mice’s exploratory behaviors and short-term working memory. The brain, hippocampus, and cerebellar tissue demonstrated neuronal injury-related histological and histomorphometric changes. A total of 70% of MSG-treated mice had poor nesting behavior. The treated mice also had more hyperphosphorylated tau protein in their cortical and hippocampus neurons. Glutamate and glutamine levels in the brain increased with MSG, and dose-dependent mixed horizontal locomotor, grooming, and anxiety responses reduced. MSG treatment significantly decreased phospho-CREB protein levels, supporting the idea that neurons were harmed, despite the increased CREB mRNA expression. High MSG doses drastically lower brain tissue and serum serotonin levels. In conclusion, MSG showed AD-like pathology, neuronal atrophy, and short-term memory impairment. Further research with a longer time span and deeper behavioral characterization is needed.

          Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42022371502].

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies

            Background Systematic Reviews (SRs) of experimental animal studies are not yet common practice, but awareness of the merits of conducting such SRs is steadily increasing. As animal intervention studies differ from randomized clinical trials (RCT) in many aspects, the methodology for SRs of clinical trials needs to be adapted and optimized for animal intervention studies. The Cochrane Collaboration developed a Risk of Bias (RoB) tool to establish consistency and avoid discrepancies in assessing the methodological quality of RCTs. A similar initiative is warranted in the field of animal experimentation. Methods We provide an RoB tool for animal intervention studies (SYRCLE’s RoB tool). This tool is based on the Cochrane RoB tool and has been adjusted for aspects of bias that play a specific role in animal intervention studies. To enhance transparency and applicability, we formulated signalling questions to facilitate judgment. Results The resulting RoB tool for animal studies contains 10 entries. These entries are related to selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and other biases. Half these items are in agreement with the items in the Cochrane RoB tool. Most of the variations between the two tools are due to differences in design between RCTs and animal studies. Shortcomings in, or unfamiliarity with, specific aspects of experimental design of animal studies compared to clinical studies also play a role. Conclusions SYRCLE’s RoB tool is an adapted version of the Cochrane RoB tool. Widespread adoption and implementation of this tool will facilitate and improve critical appraisal of evidence from animal studies. This may subsequently enhance the efficiency of translating animal research into clinical practice and increase awareness of the necessity of improving the methodological quality of animal studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Calcium dyshomeostasis and intracellular signalling in Alzheimer's disease.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2166834/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2328302/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                24 October 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1283440
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Pharmacology , SRM College of Pharmacy , SRM Institute of Science and Technology , Tamil Nadu, India
                [2] 2 Department of Pharmacy Practice , SRM College of Pharmacy , SRMIST , Tamil Nadu, India
                [3] 3 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry , School of Pharmacy , Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science , Tamil Nadu, India
                Author notes

                Edited by: Bhagavathi Sundaram Sivamaruthi, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

                Reviewed by: Santiago J. Ballaz, Yachay Tech University, Ecuador

                Subramanian Thangaleela, Saveetha University, India

                Prasanth Iyer, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

                *Correspondence: Chitra Vellapandian, chitrav@ 123456srmist.edu.in ; Ilango Kaliappan, deanpharm@ 123456hindustanuniv.ac.in
                Article
                1283440
                10.3389/fphar.2023.1283440
                10627830
                37942488
                b7a3f4cd-53c7-4a04-9a01-77a4655a6fb2
                Copyright © 2023 Ankul, Chandran, Anuragh, Kaliappan, Rushendran and Vellapandian.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 August 2023
                : 03 October 2023
                Funding
                The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                Neuropharmacology

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                monosodium glutamate,alzheimer’s disease,biomarkers,excitotoxicity,

                Comments

                Comment on this article