109
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chemotherapeutic errors in hospitalised cancer patients: attributable damage and extra costs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In spite of increasing efforts to enhance patient safety, medication errors in hospitalised patients are still relatively common, but with potentially severe consequences. This study aimed to assess antineoplastic medication errors in both affected patients and intercepted cases in terms of frequency, severity for patients, and costs.

          Methods

          A 1-year prospective study was conducted in order to identify the medication errors that occurred during chemotherapy treatment of cancer patients at a French university hospital. The severity and potential consequences of intercepted errors were independently assessed by two physicians. A cost analysis was performed using a simulation of potential hospital stays, with estimations based on the costs of diagnosis-related groups.

          Results

          Among the 6, 607 antineoplastic prescriptions, 341 (5.2%) contained at least one error, corresponding to a total of 449 medication errors. However, most errors (n = 436) were intercepted before medication was administered to the patients. Prescription errors represented 91% of errors, followed by pharmaceutical (8%) and administration errors (1%). According to an independent estimation, 13.4% of avoided errors would have resulted in temporary injury and 2.6% in permanent damage, while 2.6% would have compromised the vital prognosis of the patient, with four to eight deaths thus being avoided. Overall, 13 medication errors reached the patient without causing damage, although two patients required enhanced monitoring. If the intercepted errors had not been discovered, they would have resulted in 216 additional days of hospitalisation and cost an estimated annual total of 92, 907€, comprising 69, 248€ (74%) in hospital stays and 23, 658€ (26%) in additional drugs.

          Conclusion

          Our findings point to the very small number of chemotherapy errors that actually reach patients, although problems in the chemotherapy ordering process are frequent, with the potential for being dangerous and costly.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group.

          To assess the additional resource utilization associated with an adverse drug event (ADE). Nested case-control study within a prospective cohort study. The cohort included 4108 admissions to a stratified random sample of 11 medical and surgical units in 2 tertiary-care hospitals over a 6-month period. Cases were patients with an ADE, and the control for each case was the patient on the same unit as the case with the most similar pre-event length of stay. Postevent length of stay and total costs. Incidents were detected by self-report stimulated by nurses and pharmacists and by daily chart review, and were classified as to whether they represented ADEs. Information on length of stay and charges was obtained from billing data, and costs were estimated by multiplying components of charges times hospital-specific ratios of costs to charges. During the study period, there were 247 ADEs among 207 admissions. After outliers and multiple episodes were excluded, there were 190 ADEs, of which 60 were preventable. In paired regression analyses adjusting for multiple factors, including severity, comorbidity, and case mix, the additional length of stay associated with an ADE was 2.2 days (P=.04), and the increase in cost associated with an ADE was $3244 (P=.04). For preventable ADEs, the increases were 4.6 days in length of stay (P=.03) and $5857 in total cost (P=.07). After adjusting for our sampling strategy, the estimated postevent costs attributable to an ADE were $2595 for all ADEs and $4685 for preventable ADEs. Based on these costs and data about the incidence of ADEs, we estimate that the annual costs attributable to all ADEs and preventable ADEs for a 700-bed teaching hospital are $5.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The substantial costs of ADEs to hospitals justify investment in efforts to prevent these events. Moreover, these estimates are conservative because they do not include the costs of injuries to patients or malpractice costs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Factors related to errors in medication prescribing.

            To quantify the type and frequency of identifiable factors associated with medication prescribing errors. Systematic evaluation of every third prescribing error detected and averted by pharmacists in a 631-bed tertiary care teaching hospital between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1995. Each error was concurrently evaluated for the potential to result in adverse patient consequences. Each error was retrospectively evaluated by a physician and 2 pharmacists and a factor likely related to the error was identified. All physicians prescribing medications during the study period and all staff pharmacists involved in the routine review of medication orders. Frequency of association of factors likely related to medication errors in general and specific to medication classes and prescribing services (needed for medical, pediatric, obstetric-gynecologic, surgical, or emergency department patients); and potential consequences of errors for negative patient outcomes. A total of 2103 errors thought to have potential clinical importance were detected during the 1-year study period. The overall rate of errors was 3.99 errors per 1000 medication orders, and the error rate varied among medication classes and prescribing services. A total of 696 errors met study criteria (ie, errors with the potential for adverse patient effects) and were evaluated for a likely related factor. The most common specific factors associated with errors were decline in renal or hepatic function requiring alteration of drug therapy (97 errors, 13.9%), patient history of allergy to the same medication class (84 errors, 12.1%), using the wrong drug name, dosage form, or abbreviation (total of 79 errors, 11.4%, for both brand name and generic name orders), incorrect dosage calculations (77 errors, 11.1%), and atypical or unusual and critical dosage frequency considerations (75 errors, 10.8%). The most common groups of factors associated with errors were those related to knowledge and the application of knowledge regarding drug therapy (209 errors, 30%); knowledge and use of knowledge regarding patient factors that affect drug therapy (203 errors, 29.2%); use of calculations, decimal points, or unit and rate expression factors (122 errors, 17.5%); and nomenclature factors (incorrect drug name, dosage form, or abbreviation) (93 errors, 13.4%). Several easily identified factors are associated with a large proportion of medication prescribing errors. By improving the focus of organizational, technological, and risk management educational and training efforts using the factors commonly associated with prescribing errors, risk to patients from adverse drug events should be reduced.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Medication errors at the administration stage in an intensive care unit.

              To assess the type, frequency and potential clinical significance of medication-administration errors. Prospective study using the observation technique as described by the American Society of HealthSystem Pharmacists but eliminating the disguised aspect. Medical intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. 2009 medication administration interventions by nurses. Pharmacist-performed observation of preparation and administration of medication by nurses, comparison with the original medical order and comparison with the data available in the literature. 132 (6.6% of 2009 observed events) errors were detected. Their distribution is as follows: 41 dose errors, 29 wrong rate, 24 wrong preparation technique, 19 physicochemical incompatibility, 10 wrong administration technique and 9 wrong time errors. No fatal errors were observed, but 26 of 132 errors were potentially life-threatening and 55 potentially significant. According to this first observation-based study of medication administration errors in a European ICU, these errors were due to deficiencies in the overall organisation of the hospital medication track, in patient follow-up and in staff training.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central
                1471-2407
                2011
                8 November 2011
                : 11
                : 478
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Clinical Oncology Pharmacy Department, Pierre Bénite - Université Lyon 1, Ecole Doctorale Interdisciplinaire Sciences Santé, Lyon, France
                [2 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Department of Haematology, Pierre Bénite. Université Lyon 1, UMR5239 CNRS -ENS, Lyon, France
                [3 ]Université Lyon 1, EA 4129 « Santé Individu et Société », Lyon, France
                [4 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Clinical Oncology Pharmacy Department, Pierre Bénite, France
                [5 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Department of Haematology, Pierre Bénite, France
                [6 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Department of Oncology, Pierre Bénite- Université Lyon 1, EMR UCBL/HCL 3738, Lyon, France
                [7 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Department of Oncology, Pierre Bénite, France
                [8 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Department of Pneumology, Pierre Bénite, France
                [9 ]Hôpital d'Instructions des Armées Desgenettes, Department of pharmacy, Lyon - Université Lyon 1, Ecole Doctorale Interdisciplinaire Sciences Santé, Lyon, France
                [10 ]Université Lyon 1, EMR UCBL/HCL 3738, France
                [11 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Clinical Oncology Pharmacy Department, Pierre Bénite - Université Lyon 1, EMR UCBL/HCL 3738, Lyon, France
                Article
                1471-2407-11-478
                10.1186/1471-2407-11-478
                3262863
                22067636
                b86b0498-a979-4b8e-a43d-eecf5e953b2e
                Copyright ©2011 Ranchon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 June 2011
                : 8 November 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article