1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fishing for food: Values and benefits associated with coastal infrastructure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While there is substantial literature about the socio-cultural characteristics and values associated with recreational and commercial fisheries in the U.S., studies directed at those who ‘fish for food’—those who depend on consuming their catch to various degrees—are relatively sparse. Using qualitative data collected through 80 semi-structured interviews with fishers in the summer and fall of 2018 in Carteret County, North Carolina, this study aims to better understand the group of recreational fishers who consume their catch by describing social and cultural dimensions and values associated with fishing for food, examining the role of infrastructure in facilitating access to benefits associated with this activity, and considering how knowledge of existing licensing regulations surrounding subsistence license waivers affect this fishing community. Interviews conducted at free public fishing structures in the region revealed that fishers derive a variety of values and benefits from fishing at these sites, including access to recreation, nutrition, a social community, and mental health benefits, which were found to be negatively impacted by Hurricane Florence in September 2018. We also found an informal economy of sharing catch on- and off-site that extends the reach and benefits facilitated by public infrastructure to people beyond those using it directly. Overall, we call for conceptualizations of ‘fishing for food’ that include aspects that go beyond traditional definitions of ‘subsistence’ or ‘recreational’ fishing such as food security, access, and less obvious social and cultural motivations behind the activity. These findings are a compelling rationalization for the creation and maintenance of formal and informal fishing places locally and, by extension, in other coastal areas, given the array of benefits provided by access to these types of locations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews

          Mark Mason (2010)
          A number of issues can affect sample size in qualitative research; however, the guiding principle should be the concept of saturation. This has been explored in detail by a number of authors but is still hotly debated, and some say little understood. A sample of PhD studies using qualitative approaches, and qualitative interviews as the method of data collection was taken from theses.com and contents analysed for their sample sizes. Five hundred and sixty studies were identified that fitted the inclusion criteria. Results showed that the mean sample size was 31; however, the distribution was non-random, with a statistically significant proportion of studies, presenting sample sizes that were multiples of ten. These results are discussed in relation to saturation. They suggest a pre-meditated approach that is not wholly congruent with the principles of qualitative research. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387 Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 11, No 3 (2010): Methods for Qualitative Management Research in the Context of Social Systems Thinking
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Role of Recreational Fishing in Global Fish Crises

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations.

              We evaluated the commercial and recreational fishery landings over the past 22 years, first at the national level, then for populations of concern (those that are overfished or experiencing overfishing), and finally by region. Recreational landings in 2002 account for 4% of total marine fish landed in the United States. With large industrial fisheries excluded (e.g., menhaden and pollock), the recreational component rises to 10%. Among populations of concern, recreational landings in 2002 account for 23% of the total nationwide, rising to 38% in the South Atlantic and 64% in the Gulf of Mexico. Moreover, it affects many of the most-valued overfished species-including red drum, bocaccio, and red snapper-all of which are taken primarily in the recreational fishery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Supervision
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                15 April 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 4
                : e0249725
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Duke University Marine Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
                [2 ] Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, United States of America
                [3 ] Division of Coastal Sciences, School of Ocean Science and Engineering, The University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, Mississippi, United States of America
                University of New Haven, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-914X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3487-6396
                Article
                PONE-D-20-39815
                10.1371/journal.pone.0249725
                8049240
                33857188
                b9901ac1-c6bb-4b4d-884e-bef3f18d2ac4
                © 2021 Nieman et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 18 December 2020
                : 23 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005623, North Carolina Sea Grant, North Carolina State University;
                Award ID: R/18-RCE-1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Joseph S. Ramus Endowment Fund
                Award ID: 2018-001
                Award Recipient :
                G.M. and L.C. received funding from the NC Sea Grant project “The Value of Fishing, Farming, and Eating: new approaches to understanding coastal community well-being in a changing world”, Project Number R/18-RCE-1. https://ncseagrant.ncsu.edu/news/2018/05/nc-sea-grant-announces-2018-2020-core-research-projects/ Additional funding was provided to G.M. and L.C. from the Joseph S. Ramus Endowment Fund (2018-001). Neither funding source was involved in the study design, collection and interpretation of the data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit for publication.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Food
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Food
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Fish
                Freshwater Fish
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Fish
                Freshwater Fish
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Culture
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Fish
                Marine Fish
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Fish
                Marine Fish
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Marine Biology
                Marine Fish
                Earth Sciences
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences
                Marine Biology
                Marine Fish
                Engineering and Technology
                Civil Engineering
                Urban Infrastructure
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Recreation
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Recreation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Custom metadata
                All data files underlying our findings, including survey data and a number of interview transcripts, have been uploaded to the publicly accessible Duke Library Repository searchable by DOI 10.7924/r4057m91d. Several interview transcripts have been removed due to confidentiality concerns. The files can be accessed at the following link https://doi.org/10.7924/r4057m91d.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article