For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
23
views
8
references
 Top references
cited by
9
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      131
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) is currently the most commonly used procedure for obtaining cytologic specimens of the pancreas. It is accurate, minimally invasive, safe and cost-effective. However, there is discrepancy between cytological and surgical diagnoses. This study was aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAC of the pancreas.

          Methods:

          We performed a retrospective review of 191 cases of pancreatic lesions initially diagnosed by EUS-FNAC with subsequent histological diagnosis between 2010 and 2012 in the Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital. Cytologic and surgical diagnoses were categorized into five groups: negative, benign, atypical, malignant, and insufficient for diagnosis. Subsequently, 167 cases with satisfactory yield in both surgical and cytology specimens were statistically analyzed to determine correlations with diagnosis.

          Results:

          In comparison to surgical diagnoses, cytologic diagnoses were true-positive in 103 cases (61.7%), true-negative in 28 cases (16.8%), false-positive in 9 cases (5.4%), and false-negative in 27 cases (16.1%). The diagnostic accuracy was 78.4%, sensitivity was 79.2%, and specificity was 75.7%. The positive predictive value was 92.0%, and negative predictive value was 50.9%.

          Conclusions:

          EUS-FNAC has high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. Overcoming the limitations of EUS-FNAC will make it a useful and reliable diagnostic tool for accurate evaluation of pancreatic lesions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis.

          Shyam Varadarajulu, Ashutosh Tamhane, Mohamad A. Eloubeidi (2005)
          Evaluation of a focal pancreatic mass in the setting of chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a diagnostic challenge. The objectives of the study were to compare the diagnostic yield and accuracy of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) in the evaluation of pancreatic-mass lesions in the presence or the absence of CP and to identify predictors of CP before EUS-FNA of pancreatic-mass lesions. The study design was analysis of data collected prospectively on all patients with solid pancreatic-mass lesions who underwent EUS-FNA at a tertiary referral center. A total of 282 consecutive patients underwent 300 EUS-FNA procedures of pancreatic-mass lesions over a 3-year period. The diagnostic yield and the accuracy of EUS-FNA was compared between patients with and without CP. CP was defined by the presence of more than 4 EUS criteria. Final diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 210 (70%), benign disease in 64 (21%), other pathology in 19 (6%), and indeterminate in 4 (2%); 3 patients (1%) were lost to follow-up. CP was noted in 75/300 (25%) patients. A lower sensitivity for EUS-FNA was observed in patients with CP than in those without CP (73.9% vs. 91.3%; p = 0.02). While patients with CP had a higher negative predictive value (88.9% vs. 45.5%; p < 0.001), no significant differences were observed for specificity (100% vs. 93.8%), positive predictive value (100% vs. 99.5%), and accuracy (91.5% vs. 91.4%) between those with and without CP. False-negative cytology was encountered in 24 cases: 6/71 (8%) with CP vs. 18/222 (8%) without CP. Patients with CP required more EUS-FNA passes to establish a diagnosis vs. those without CP (median, 5 vs. 2; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, age < 50 years (p < 0.001), male gender (p < 0.001), black race (p = 0.001), and the absence of jaundice (p = 0.005) were significantly associated with CP. The impact of EUS-FNA on long-term clinical management was not analyzed. The impact of individual EUS features of CP on sensitivity of EUS-FNA was not evaluated. By protocol, mass lesions that were benign required more passes to definitively exclude malignancy. EUS-FNA has a low sensitivity for pancreatic-mass lesions in the setting of CP. This decreased sensitivity can be overcome by performing more numbers of passes at FNA, which improves diagnostic accuracy. Demographic features and clinical presentation are predictive of underlying CP in patients with pancreatic-mass lesions.
          Article 0 comments Cited 72 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.

            Haruhisa Suzuki, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Ichiro Oda … (2011)
            Since it was developed in 1992, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been widely used and has been adapted for gastrointestinal and perigastrointestinal lesions. A medical literature review to evaluate the role of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses showed a 78-95% sensitivity, 75-100% specificity, 98-100% positive predictive value, 46-80% negative predictive value and a 78-95% accuracy. The reported complication rates of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid masses were 0-2%, although the criteria for complications varied among the studies. Because of its high diagnostic yield and low complication rate, EUS-FNA is cost-effective and widely applicable for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses, and is the best initial and the preferred secondary method compared with other biopsy techniques, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biopsy, computed tomography/ultrasound-FNA and surgery. Although EUS-FNA is 'a nearly perfected procedure,' controversy remains, such as the most suitable diameter of the needle, the appropriate number of needle passes and the necessity of on-site cytopathological evaluation. Recently investigators reported that using molecular analysis of EUS-FNA samples can achieve a higher diagnostic efficacy. Further research is encouraged to optimize the EUS-FNA procedure to reach its maximum diagnostic yield for solid pancreatic masses. © 2011 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2011 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
            Article 0 comments Cited 45 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pancreatic schwannoma: Case report and an updated 30-year review of the literature yielding 47 cases.

              Toshihiro Watanabe, K Tezuka, Wataru Kimura … (2012)
              Pancreatic schwannomas are rare neoplasms. Authors briefly describe a 64-year-old female patient with cystic pancreatic schwannoma mimicking other cystic tumors and review the literature. Databases for PubMed were searched for English-language articles from 1980 to 2010 using a list of keywords, as well as references from review articles. Only 41 articles, including 47 cases, have been reported in the English literature. The mean age was 55.7 years (range 20-87 years), with 45% of patients being male. Mean tumor size was 6.2 cm (range 1-20 cm). Tumor location was the head (40%), head and body (6%), body (21%), body and tail (15%), tail (4%), and uncinate process (13%). Thirty-four percent of patients exhibited solid tumors and 60% of patients exhibited cystic tumors. Treatment included pancreaticoduodenectomy (32%), distal pancreatectomy (21%), enucleation (15%), unresectable (4%), refused operation (2%) and the detail of resection was not specified in 26% of patients. No patients died of disease with a mean follow-up of 15.7 mo (range 3-65 mo), although 5 (11%) patients had a malignancy. The tumor size was significantly related to malignant tumor (13.8 ± 6.2 cm for malignancy vs 5.5 ± 4.4 cm for benign, P = 0.001) and cystic formation (7.9 ± 5.9 cm for cystic tumor vs 3.9 ± 2.4 cm for solid tumor, P = 0.005). The preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic schwannoma remains difficult. Cystic pancreatic schwannomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic neoplasms and pseudocysts. In our case, intraoperative frozen section confirmed the diagnosis of a schwannoma. Simple enucleation may be adequate, if this is possible.
              Article 0 comments Cited 30 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Pathol Transl Med
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J Pathol Transl Med
                Journal ID (publisher-id): JPTM
                Title: Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
                Publisher: The Korean Society of Pathologists and The Korean Society for Cytopathology
                ISSN (Print): 2383-7837
                ISSN (Electronic): 2383-7845
                Publication date (Print): January 2015
                Publication date (Electronic): 15 January 2015
                Volume: 49
                Issue: 1
                Pages: 52-60
                Affiliations
                Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: In Ae Park, M.D. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea Tel: +82-2-2072-3312 Fax: +82-2-743-5530 E-mail: iapark@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                Article
                Publisher ID: jptm-49-1-52
                DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2014.10.26
                PMC ID: 4357401
                PubMed ID: 25812658
                SO-VID: babbf6ec-cdee-4580-955d-514e9f239fd6
                Copyright © © 2015 The Korean Society of Pathologists/The Korean Society for Cytopathology
                License:

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Date received : 5 September 2014
                Date revision received : 24 October 2014
                Date accepted : 24 October 2014
                Categories
                Subject: Original Article

                Keywords: pancreas,endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology,accuracy,diagnosis
                Data availability:
                Keywords: pancreas, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology, accuracy, diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content131

                See all similar

                Cited by14

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors164

                See all reference authors