6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Single-Dose, Intranasal Immunization with Recombinant Parainfluenza Virus 5 Expressing Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) Spike Protein Protects Mice from Fatal MERS-CoV Infection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          MERS-CoV causes lethal infection in humans, and there is no vaccine. Our work demonstrates that PIV5 is a promising vector for developing a MERS vaccine. Furthermore, success of PIV5-based MERS vaccine can be employed to develop a vaccine for emerging CoVs such as SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19.

          ABSTRACT

          Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) can cause severe and fatal acute respiratory disease in humans and remains endemic in the Middle East since first being identified in 2012. There are currently no approved vaccines or therapies available for MERS-CoV. In this study, we evaluated parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5)-based vaccine expressing the MERS-CoV envelope spike protein (PIV5/MERS-S) in a human DPP4 knockin C57BL/6 congenic mouse model (hDPP4 KI). Following a single-dose intranasal immunization, PIV5-MERS-S induced neutralizing antibody and robust T cell responses in hDPP4 KI mice. A single intranasal administration of 10 4 PFU PIV5-MERS-S provided complete protection against a lethal challenge with mouse-adapted MERS-CoV (MERS MA6.1.2) and improved virus clearance in the lung. In comparison, single-dose intramuscular immunization with 10 6 PFU UV-inactivated MERS MA6.1.2 mixed with Imject alum provided protection to only 25% of immunized mice. Intriguingly, an influx of eosinophils was observed only in the lungs of mice immunized with inactivated MERS-CoV, suggestive of a hypersensitivity-type response. Overall, our study indicated that PIV5-MERS-S is a promising effective vaccine candidate against MERS-CoV infection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.

          A previously unknown coronavirus was isolated from the sputum of a 60-year-old man who presented with acute pneumonia and subsequent renal failure with a fatal outcome in Saudi Arabia. The virus (called HCoV-EMC) replicated readily in cell culture, producing cytopathic effects of rounding, detachment, and syncytium formation. The virus represents a novel betacoronavirus species. The closest known relatives are bat coronaviruses HKU4 and HKU5. Here, the clinical data, virus isolation, and molecular identification are presented. The clinical picture was remarkably similar to that of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003 and reminds us that animal coronaviruses can cause severe disease in humans.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Hospital Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

            In September 2012, the World Health Organization reported the first cases of pneumonia caused by the novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). We describe a cluster of health care-acquired MERS-CoV infections. Medical records were reviewed for clinical and demographic information and determination of potential contacts and exposures. Case patients and contacts were interviewed. The incubation period and serial interval (the time between the successive onset of symptoms in a chain of transmission) were estimated. Viral RNA was sequenced. Between April 1 and May 23, 2013, a total of 23 cases of MERS-CoV infection were reported in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Symptoms included fever in 20 patients (87%), cough in 20 (87%), shortness of breath in 11 (48%), and gastrointestinal symptoms in 8 (35%); 20 patients (87%) presented with abnormal chest radiographs. As of June 12, a total of 15 patients (65%) had died, 6 (26%) had recovered, and 2 (9%) remained hospitalized. The median incubation period was 5.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 14.7), and the serial interval was 7.6 days (95% CI, 2.5 to 23.1). A total of 21 of the 23 cases were acquired by person-to-person transmission in hemodialysis units, intensive care units, or in-patient units in three different health care facilities. Sequencing data from four isolates revealed a single monophyletic clade. Among 217 household contacts and more than 200 health care worker contacts whom we identified, MERS-CoV infection developed in 5 family members (3 with laboratory-confirmed cases) and in 2 health care workers (both with laboratory-confirmed cases). Person-to-person transmission of MERS-CoV can occur in health care settings and may be associated with considerable morbidity. Surveillance and infection-control measures are critical to a global public health response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Contributions of the structural proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus to protective immunity.

              We investigated the contributions of the structural proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) to protective immunity by expressing them individually and in combinations from a recombinant parainfluenza virus (PIV) type 3 vector called BHPIV3. This vector provided direct immunization of the respiratory tract, the major site of SARS transmission, replication, and disease. The BHPIV3/SARS recombinants were evaluated for immunogenicity and protective efficacy in hamsters, which support a high level of pulmonary SARS-CoV replication. A single intranasal administration of BHPIV3 expressing the SARS-CoV spike protein (S) induced a high titer of SARS-CoV-neutralizing serum antibodies, only 2-fold less than that induced by SARS-CoV infection. The expression of S with the two other putative virion envelope proteins, the matrix M and small envelope E proteins, did not augment the neutralizing antibody response. In absence of S, expression of M and E or the nucleocapsid protein N did not induce a detectable serum SARS-CoV-neutralizing antibody response. Immunization with BHPIV3 expressing S provided complete protection against SARS-CoV challenge in the lower respiratory tract and partial protection in the upper respiratory tract. This was augmented slightly by coexpression with M and E. Expression of M, E, or N in the absence of S did not confer detectable protection. These results identify S among the structural proteins as the only significant SARS-CoV neutralization antigen and protective antigen and show that a single mucosal immunization is highly protective in an experimental animal that supports efficient replication of SARS-CoV.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                mBio
                mBio
                mbio
                mbio
                mBio
                mBio
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2150-7511
                7 April 2020
                Mar-Apr 2020
                : 11
                : 2
                : e00554-20
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Pediatrics, Pappajohn Biomedical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
                [b ]Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
                [c ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
                [d ]Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
                The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Paul B. McCray, Jr., paul-mccray@ 123456uiowa.edu , or Biao He, bhe@ 123456uga.edu .
                [*]

                Present address: Zhuo Li, Center for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Rudragouda Channappanavar, Departments of Acute and Tertiary Care and of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4213-2354
                Article
                mBio00554-20
                10.1128/mBio.00554-20
                7157776
                32265331
                bb3d96c2-918b-428a-ab97-fbd756e87af9
                Copyright © 2020 Li et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 6 March 2020
                : 24 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 53, Pages: 12, Words: 7726
                Funding
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), https://doi.org/10.13039/100000060;
                Award ID: P01 AI060699
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), https://doi.org/10.13039/100000062;
                Award ID: P30 DK54759
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CF Foundation), https://doi.org/10.13039/100000897;
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Therapeutics and Prevention
                Custom metadata
                March/April 2020

                Life sciences
                covid-19,mers,coronavirus,vaccine
                Life sciences
                covid-19, mers, coronavirus, vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article