4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine the association between antihypertensive treatment and specific adverse events.

          Design

          Systematic review and meta-analysis.

          Eligibility criteria

          Randomised controlled trials of adults receiving antihypertensives compared with placebo or no treatment, more antihypertensive drugs compared with fewer antihypertensive drugs, or higher blood pressure targets compared with lower targets. To avoid small early phase trials, studies were required to have at least 650 patient years of follow-up.

          Information sources

          Searches were conducted in Embase, Medline, CENTRAL, and the Science Citation Index databases from inception until 14 April 2020.

          Main outcome measures

          The primary outcome was falls during trial follow-up. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury, fractures, gout, hyperkalaemia, hypokalaemia, hypotension, and syncope. Additional outcomes related to death and major cardiovascular events were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and random effects meta-analysis was used to pool rate ratios, odds ratios, and hazard ratios across studies, allowing for between study heterogeneity (τ 2).

          Results

          Of 15 023 articles screened for inclusion, 58 randomised controlled trials were identified, including 280 638 participants followed up for a median of 3 (interquartile range 2-4) years. Most of the trials (n=40, 69%) had a low risk of bias. Among seven trials reporting data for falls, no evidence was found of an association with antihypertensive treatment (summary risk ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.24, τ 2=0.009). Antihypertensives were associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.39, τ 2=0.037, n=15), hyperkalaemia (1.89, 1.56 to 2.30, τ 2=0.122, n=26), hypotension (1.97, 1.67 to 2.32, τ 2=0.132, n=35), and syncope (1.28, 1.03 to 1.59, τ 2=0.050, n=16). The heterogeneity between studies assessing acute kidney injury and hyperkalaemia events was reduced when focusing on drugs that affect the renin angiotensin-aldosterone system. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses focusing on adverse events leading to withdrawal from each trial. Antihypertensive treatment was associated with a reduced risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and stroke, but not of myocardial infarction.

          Conclusions

          This meta-analysis found no evidence to suggest that antihypertensive treatment is associated with falls but found evidence of an association with mild (hyperkalaemia, hypotension) and severe adverse events (acute kidney injury, syncope). These data could be used to inform shared decision making between doctors and patients about initiation and continuation of antihypertensive treatment, especially in patients at high risk of harm because of previous adverse events or poor renal function.

          Registration

          PROSPERO CRD42018116860.

          Related collections

          Most cited references122

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

          Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: research fellow
                Role: research associate
                Role: statistician
                Role: foundation year doctor
                Role: medical student
                Role: medical student
                Role: senior statistician
                Role: research associate
                Role: postdoctoral research fellow
                Role: senior lecturer
                Role: professor of biostatistics
                Role: librarian
                Role: lecturer
                Role: senior statistician
                Role: university lecturer
                Role: associate professor
                Role: Nuffield professor of primary care
                Role: professor of primary care research
                Role: university research lecturer
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-UK
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2021
                10 February 2021
                : 372
                : n189
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
                [2 ]School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
                [3 ]Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
                [4 ]Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                [5 ]NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
                [6 ]Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [7 ]Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: J P Sheppard james.sheppard@ 123456phc.ox.ac.uk (or @jamessheppard48 on Twitter)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-1965
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1542-6277
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0509-6983
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-5919
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0946-742X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2504-2613
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-3689
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5842-4645
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1142-6440
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9373-6591
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-2531
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3638-028X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4461-8756
                Article
                alba062412
                10.1136/bmj.n189
                7873715
                33568342
                bba60db9-09a3-4a6d-908a-0f9ad9cae802
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 January 2021
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content448

                Cited by33

                Most referenced authors4,008