6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multitracer model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET imaging

      research-article
      , MSc, , MSc, , MSc, , MD, , MS, , MD, , MD, , BSc, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , MD, , PhD, , PhD , for the ALFA Study, for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, on behalf of the AMYPAD Consortium
      Neurology
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To develop and evaluate a model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET with high generalizability.

          Methods

          Three thousand twenty-seven individuals (1,763 cognitively unimpaired [CU], 658 impaired, 467 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, 111 with non-AD dementia, and 28 with missing diagnosis) from 6 cohorts (European Medical Information Framework for AD, Alzheimer's and Family, Alzheimer's Biomarkers in Daily Practice, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, Open Access Series of Imaging Studies [OASIS]-3, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ADNI]) who underwent amyloid PET were retrospectively included; 1,049 individuals had follow-up scans. With application of dataset-specific cutoffs to global standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) values from 27 regions, single-tracer and pooled multitracer regional rankings were constructed from the frequency of abnormality across 400 CU individuals (100 per tracer). The pooled multitracer ranking was used to create a staging model consisting of 4 clusters of regions because it displayed a high and consistent correlation with each single-tracer ranking. Relationships between amyloid stage, clinical variables, and longitudinal cognitive decline were investigated.

          Results

          SUVr abnormality was most frequently observed in cingulate, followed by orbitofrontal, precuneal, and insular cortices and then the associative, temporal, and occipital regions. Abnormal amyloid levels based on binary global SUVr classification were observed in 1.0%, 5.5%, 17.9%, 90.0%, and 100.0% of individuals in stage 0 to 4, respectively. Baseline stage predicted decline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (ADNI: n = 867, F = 67.37, p < 0.001; OASIS: n = 475, F = 9.12, p < 0.001) and faster progression toward an MMSE score ≤25 (ADNI: n = 787, hazard ratio [HR] stage1 2.00, HR stage2 3.53, HR stage3 4.55, HR stage4 9.91, p < 0.001; OASIS: n = 469, HR stage4 4.80, p < 0.001).

          Conclusion

          The pooled multitracer staging model successfully classified the level of amyloid burden in >3,000 individuals across cohorts and radiotracers and detects preglobal amyloid burden and distinct risk profiles of cognitive decline within globally amyloid-positive individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease

          In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association created separate diagnostic recommendations for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific progress in the interim led to an initiative by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association to update and unify the 2011 guidelines. This unifying update is labeled a “research framework” because its intended use is for observational and interventional research, not routine clinical care. In the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined by its underlying pathologic processes that can be documented by postmortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. The diagnosis is not based on the clinical consequences of the disease (i.e., symptoms/signs) in this research framework, which shifts the definition of AD in living people from a syndromal to a biological construct. The research framework focuses on the diagnosis of AD with biomarkers in living persons. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration [AT(N)]. This ATN classification system groups different biomarkers (imaging and biofluids) by the pathologic process each measures. The AT(N) system is flexible in that new biomarkers can be added to the three existing AT(N) groups, and new biomarker groups beyond AT(N) can be added when they become available. We focus on AD as a continuum, and cognitive staging may be accomplished using continuous measures. However, we also outline two different categorical cognitive schemes for staging the severity of cognitive impairment: a scheme using three traditional syndromal categories and a six-stage numeric scheme. It is important to stress that this framework seeks to create a common language with which investigators can generate and test hypotheses about the interactions among different pathologic processes (denoted by biomarkers) and cognitive symptoms. We appreciate the concern that this biomarker-based research framework has the potential to be misused. Therefore, we emphasize, first, it is premature and inappropriate to use this research framework in general medical practice. Second, this research framework should not be used to restrict alternative approaches to hypothesis testing that do not use biomarkers. There will be situations where biomarkers are not available or requiring them would be counterproductive to the specific research goals (discussed in more detail later in the document). Thus, biomarker-based research should not be considered a template for all research into age-related cognitive impairment and dementia; rather, it should be applied when it is fit for the purpose of the specific research goals of a study. Importantly, this framework should be examined in diverse populations. Although it is possible that β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau deposits are not causal in AD pathogenesis, it is these abnormal protein deposits that define AD as a unique neurodegenerative disease among different disorders that can lead to dementia. We envision that defining AD as a biological construct will enable a more accurate characterization and understanding of the sequence of events that lead to cognitive impairment that is associated with AD, as well as the multifactorial etiology of dementia. This approach also will enable a more precise approach to interventional trials where specific pathways can be targeted in the disease process and in the appropriate people.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest.

            In this study, we have assessed the validity and reliability of an automated labeling system that we have developed for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on magnetic resonance images into gyral based regions of interest (ROIs). Using a dataset of 40 MRI scans we manually identified 34 cortical ROIs in each of the individual hemispheres. This information was then encoded in the form of an atlas that was utilized to automatically label ROIs. To examine the validity, as well as the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the automated system, we used both intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and a new method known as mean distance maps, to assess the degree of mismatch between the manual and the automated sets of ROIs. When compared with the manual ROIs, the automated ROIs were highly accurate, with an average ICC of 0.835 across all of the ROIs, and a mean distance error of less than 1 mm. Intra- and inter-rater comparisons yielded little to no difference between the sets of ROIs. These findings suggest that the automated method we have developed for subdividing the human cerebral cortex into standard gyral-based neuroanatomical regions is both anatomically valid and reliable. This method may be useful for both morphometric and functional studies of the cerebral cortex as well as for clinical investigations aimed at tracking the evolution of disease-induced changes over time, including clinical trials in which MRI-based measures are used to examine response to treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes

              Eighty-three brains obtained at autopsy from nondemented and demented individuals were examined for extracellular amyloid deposits and intraneuronal neurofibrillary changes. The distribution pattern and packing density of amyloid deposits turned out to be of limited significance for differentiation of neuropathological stages. Neurofibrillary changes occurred in the form of neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads. The distribution of neuritic plaques varied widely not only within architectonic units but also from one individual to another. Neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads, in contrast, exhibited a characteristic distribution pattern permitting the differentiation of six stages. The first two stages were characterized by an either mild or severe alteration of the transentorhinal layer Pre-alpha (transentorhinal stages I-II). The two forms of limbic stages (stages III-IV) were marked by a conspicuous affection of layer Pre-alpha in both transentorhinal region and proper entorhinal cortex. In addition, there was mild involvement of the first Ammon's horn sector. The hallmark of the two isocortical stages (stages V-VI) was the destruction of virtually all isocortical association areas. The investigation showed that recognition of the six stages required qualitative evaluation of only a few key preparations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurology
                Neurology
                neurology
                neur
                neurology
                NEUROLOGY
                Neurology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0028-3878
                1526-632X
                15 September 2020
                15 September 2020
                : 95
                : 11
                : e1538-e1553
                Affiliations
                From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Dr. Lopes Alves i.lopesalves@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl

                Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                ALFA Study Group coinvestigators are listed at links.lww.com/WNL/B170.

                AMYPAD coinvestigators are listed at links.lww.com/WNL/B172.

                Data used in precreation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database ( adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found in the coinvestigators list at links.lww.com/WNL/B171.

                The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7769-8329
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-740X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2902-2268
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8197-0118
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-6408
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-6224
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-0642
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-3706
                Article
                NEUROLOGY2019026054 00012
                10.1212/WNL.0000000000010256
                7713745
                32675080
                bbb2f85d-a532-4c6c-a10c-0eaf01c4d01e
                Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 09 September 2019
                : 20 March 2020
                Categories
                26
                122
                Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                ONLINE-ONLY

                Comments

                Comment on this article