6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To publish with AIAA, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Gradient-Limiting Shape Control for Efficient Aerodynamic Optimization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Local shape control methods, such as B-spline surfaces, are well-conditioned such that they allow high-fidelity design optimization; however, this comes at the cost of degraded optimization convergence rate as control fidelity is refined due to the resulting exponential increase in the size of the design space. Moreover, optimizations in higher-fidelity design spaces become ill-posed due to high-frequency shape components being insufficiently bounded; this can lead to nonsmooth and oscillatory geometries that are invalid in both physicality (shape) and discretization (mesh). This issue is addressed here by developing a geometrically meaningful constraint to reduce the effective degrees of freedom and improve the design space, thereby improving optimization convergence rate and final result. A new approach to shape control is presented using coordinate control ( x , z ) to recover shape-relevant displacements and surface gradient constraints to ensure smooth and valid iterates. The new formulation transforms constraints directly onto design variables, and these bound the out-of-plane variations to ensure smooth shapes as well as the in-plane variations for mesh validity. Shape gradient constraints approximating a C 2 continuity condition are derived and demonstrated on a challenging test case: inviscid transonic drag minimization of a symmetric NACA0012 airfoil. Significantly, the regularized shape problem is shown to have an optimization convergence rate independent of both shape control fidelity and numerical mesh resolution, while still making use of increased control fidelity to achieve improved results. Consequently, a value of 1.6 drag counts is achieved on the test case, the lowest value achieved by any method.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Aerodynamic design via control theory

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Wing Design by Numerical Optimization

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Conference
                aiaaj
                AIAA Journal
                AIAA Journal
                American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
                1533-385X
                31 July 2020
                September 2020
                : 58
                : 9
                : 3748-3764
                Affiliations
                University of Bristol , Bristol, England BS8 1TR, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [*]

                Ph.D. Student, Department of Aerospace Engineering; laurence.kedward@ 123456bristol.ac.uk . Student Member AIAA.

                [†]

                Professor of Computational Aerodynamics, Department of Aerospace Engineering; c.b.allen@ 123456bristol.ac.uk . Senior Member AIAA.

                [‡]

                Senior Lecturer, Department of Aerospace Engineering; thomas.rendall@ 123456bristol.ac.uk . Member AIAA.

                Article
                J058977 J058977
                10.2514/1.J058977
                bbe481a0-f9ff-4c02-ac04-1fd850c287f4
                Copyright © 2020 by Laurence Kedward. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.
                History
                : 13 September 2019
                : 19 March 2020
                : 21 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 19, Tables: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266
                Award ID: EP/M507994/1
                Categories
                Regular Articles
                p2089, Guidance, Navigation, and Control Systems
                p2263, Fluid Dynamics
                p3421, General Physics
                p2132, Aircraft Operations and Technology
                p2228, Aerospace Sciences
                p2073, Aeronautics
                p2235, Structures, Design and Test
                p2187, Computing, Information, and Communication
                p2291, Thermophysics and Heat Transfer
                p1927, Control Theory
                p1812, Airfoil
                p1804, Aerodynamics
                p6063, Coordinate System
                p6286, Optimal Control Theory
                p3304, Numerical Analysis
                p2049, Optimization Algorithm
                p2057, Finite Element Method
                p3309, Elementary Algebra
                p24294, Search Algorithm

                Engineering,Physics,Mechanical engineering,Space Physics
                BFGS,Drag Reduction,B-splines,shape optimization,search algorithm,shape functions,SQP,singular value decomposition,Search Algorithm,Shape Control,aerodynamic design,aerodynamic shape optimization,airfoil profile,drag reduction,drag coefficient,implicit methods,numerical analysis,airfoil,sequential quadratic programming,shape-optimization,NACA 0012,shape control,Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno,quadratic programming,Aerodynamic Design,Shape control,SVD,Cartesian coordinates

                Comments

                Comment on this article