42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Support and assessment for fall emergency referrals (SAFER 2) research protocol: cluster randomised trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess and refer to appropriate community-based care

      protocol

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Emergency calls to ambulance services are frequent for older people who have fallen, but ambulance crews often leave patients at the scene without ongoing care. Evidence shows that when left at home with no further support older people often experience subsequent falls which result in injury and emergency-department attendances. SAFER 2 is an evaluation of a new clinical protocol which allows paramedics to assess and refer older people who have fallen, and do not need hospital care, to community-based falls services. In this protocol paper, we report methods and progress during trial implementation. SAFER 2 is recruiting patients through three ambulance services. A successful trial will provide robust evidence about the value of this new model of care, and enable ambulance services to use resources efficiently.

          Design

          Pragmatic cluster randomised trial.

          Methods and analysis

          We randomly allocated 25 participating ambulance stations (clusters) in three services to intervention or control group. Intervention paramedics received training and clinical protocols for assessing and referring older people who have fallen to community-based falls services when appropriate, while control paramedics deliver care as usual. Patients are eligible for the trial if they are aged 65 or over; resident in a participating falls service catchment area; and attended by a trial paramedic following an emergency call coded as a fall without priority symptoms. The principal outcome is the rate of further emergency contacts (or death), for any cause and for falls. Secondary outcomes include further falls, health-related quality of life, ‘fear of falling’, patient satisfaction reported by participants through postal questionnaires at 1 and 6 months, and quality and pathways of care at the index incident. We shall compare National Health Service (NHS) and patient/carer costs between intervention and control groups and estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the intervention and thus incremental cost per QALY. We shall estimate wider system effects on key-performance indicators. We shall interview 60 intervention patients, and conduct focus groups with contributing NHS staff to explore their experiences of the assessment and referral service. We shall analyse quantitative trial data by ‘treatment allocated’; and qualitative data using content analysis.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The Research Ethics Committee for Wales gave ethical approval and each participating centre gave NHS Research and Development approval. We shall disseminate study findings through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

          Trial Registration: ISRCTN 60481756

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions.

          We sought to synthesize the literature on patterns of use of emergency services among older adults, risk factors associated with adverse health outcomes, and effectiveness of intervention strategies targeting this population. Relevant articles were identified by means of an English-language search of MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, CINAHL, Current Contents, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1985 to January 2001. This search was supplemented with literature from reference sections of the retrieved publications. A qualitative approach was used to synthesize the literature. Compared with younger persons, older adults use emergency services at a higher rate, their visits have a greater level of urgency, they have longer stays in the emergency department, they are more likely to be admitted or to have repeat ED visits, and they experience higher rates of adverse health outcomes after discharge. The risk factors commonly associated with the negative outcomes are age, functional impairment, recent hospitalization or ED use, living alone, and lack of social support. Comprehensive geriatric screening and coordinated discharge planning initiatives designed to improve clinical outcomes in older emergency patients have provided inconclusive results. Older ED patients have distinct patterns of service use and care needs. The current disease-oriented and episodic models of emergency care do not adequately respond to the complex care needs of frail older patients. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of screening and intervention strategies targeting at-risk older ED patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial.

              Falls in elderly people are a common presenting complaint to accident and emergency departments. Current practice commonly focuses on the injury, with little systematic assessment of the underlying cause, functional consequences, and possibilities for future prevention. We undertook a randomised controlled study to assess the benefit of a structured inderdisciplinary assessment of people who have fallen in terms of further falls. Eligible patients were aged 65 years and older, lived in the community, and presented to an accident and emergency department with a fall. Patients assigned to the intervention group (n=184) underwent a detailed medical and occupational-therapy assessment with referral to relevant services if indicated; those assigned to the control group (n=213) received usual care only. The analyses were by intention to treat. Follow-up data were collected every 4 months for 1 year. At 12-month follow-up, 77% of both groups remained in the study. The total reported number of falls during this period was 183 in the intervention group compared with 510 in the control group (p=0.0002). The risk of falling was significantly reduced in the intervention group (odds ratio 0.39 [95% CI 0.23-0.66]) as was the risk of recurrent falls (0.33 [0.16-0.68]). In addition, the odds of admission to hospital were lower in the intervention group (0.61 [0.35-1.05]) whereas the decline in Barthel score with time was greater in the control group (p<0.00001). The study shows that an interdisciplinary approach to this high-risk population can significantly decrease the risk of further falls and limit functional impairment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2012
                12 November 2012
                : 2
                : 6
                : e002169
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Health Information Research and Evaluation, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
                [2 ]School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
                [3 ]Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
                [4 ]Clinical Audit and Research Unit, London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, London, UK
                [5 ]Faculty of Health and Social Services, St Georges University Hospital, London, UK
                [6 ]Community Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
                [7 ]Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
                [8 ]Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
                [9 ]West Wales Organisation for Rigorous Trials in Health, College of Medicine, Swansea, UK
                [10 ]School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
                [11 ]Department of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
                [12 ]School of Business and Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
                [13 ]Pre-hospital Emergency Research Unit (PERU), Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Helen Snooks; h.a.snooks@ 123456swansea.ac.uk
                Article
                bmjopen-2012-002169
                10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002169
                3533098
                23148348
                bd1d93d5-e95b-45c4-a7b4-bc8965545803
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 28 September 2012
                : 3 October 2012
                Categories
                Emergency Medicine
                Protocol
                1506
                1691
                1698
                1694
                1704
                1701
                1730

                Medicine
                injury prevention,accident & emergency medicine
                Medicine
                injury prevention, accident & emergency medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article