48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The TREAT-NMD care and trial site registry: an online registry to facilitate clinical research for neuromuscular diseases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Rare diseases pose many research challenges specific to their scarcity. Advances in potential therapies have made it more important than ever to be able to adequately identify not only patients with particular genotypes (via patient registries) but also the medical professionals who provide care for them at particular specialist centres of expertise and who may be competent to participate in trials. Work within the neuromuscular field provides an example of how this may be achieved.

          Methods

          This paper describes the development of the TREAT-NMD Care and Trial Site Registry (CTSR), an initiative of an EU-funded Network of Excellence, and its utility in providing an infrastructure for clinical trial feasibility, recruitment, and other studies.

          Results

          285 CTSR-registered centres, reporting 35,495 neuromuscular patients, are described alongside an analysis of their provision for DMD. Site characteristics vary by country: the average number of DMD patients seen per site in the United States (96) is more than in Germany (25), and paediatric/adult breakdown is also markedly distinct. Over 70% of sites have previous trial experience, with a majority including a Clinical Trials Unit. Most sites also have MLPA diagnostic capability and access to a range of medical specialists. However, in the three countries reporting most sites (US, the UK and Germany), few had access to all core DMD specialists internally. Over 60% of sites did not report any form of transition arrangement.

          Conclusions

          Registries of care and trial sites have significant utility for research into rare conditions such as neuromuscular diseases, demonstrated by the significant engagement by industry and other researchers with the CTSR. We suggest that this approach may be applicable to other fields needing to identify centres of expertise with the potential to carry out clinical research and engage in clinical trials. Such registries also lend themselves to the developing context of European Reference Networks (ERNs), which seek to build networks of centres of expertise which fit specific criteria, and which may themselves aid the sustainability of such registries. This is particularly the case given the utility of registries such as the CTSR in enabling networks of best-practice care centres.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genotype-phenotype analysis in 2,405 patients with a dystrophinopathy using the UMD-DMD database: a model of nationwide knowledgebase.

          UMD-DMD France is a knowledgebase developed through a multicenter academic effort to provide an up-to-date resource of curated information covering all identified mutations in patients with a dystrophinopathy. The current release includes 2,411 entries consisting in 2,084 independent mutational events identified in 2,046 male patients and 38 expressing females, which corresponds to an estimated number of 39 people per million with a genetic diagnosis of dystrophinopathy in France. Mutations consist in 1,404 large deletions, 215 large duplications, and 465 small rearrangements, of which 39.8% are nonsense mutations. The reading frame rule holds true for 96% of the DMD patients and 93% of the BMD patients. Quality control relies on the curation by four experts for the DMD gene and related diseases. Data on dystrophin and RNA analysis, phenotypic groups, and transmission are also available. About 24% of the mutations are de novo events. This national centralized resource will contribute to a greater understanding of prevalence of dystrophinopathies in France, and in particular, of the true frequency of BMD, which was found to be almost half (43%) that of DMD. UMD-DMD is a searchable anonymous database that includes numerous newly developed tools, which can benefit to all the scientific community interested in dystrophinopathies. Dedicated functions for genotype-based therapies allowed the prediction of a new multiexon skipping (del 45-53) potentially applicable to 53% of the deleted DMD patients. Finally, such a national database will prove to be useful to implement the international global DMD patients' registries under development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Transition to adulthood for young men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: research from the UK.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              EPIRARE survey on activities and needs of rare disease registries in the European Union

              The EPIRARE project[1] aims to build consensus and synergies for the development of an EU platform for rare disease registries and to address relevant regulatory, ethical and technical issues associated with the registration of rare disease patients. To this aim, a survey was carried out among existing rare disease registries and databases to get information on their objectives, needs, governance mechanisms, sustainability, and measures for the compliance with regulatory and ethical requirements and for quality assurance, as well as expectations from and opinions on a registry platform. Responses were received from 255 registries, of which 220 active registries were selected based on the completeness of the response. Among responding registries, 18, 61, 17 and 3% were international, national, regional or local. The fraction of registries population based, hospital based and following case series or cohorts was, respectively 56, 23 and 20%. Epidemiological and clinical researches were the most declared scopes (respectively 71, 61% in a multiple answer question) and characterized two clearly different clusters of registries. Treatment efficacy and safety was the scope indicated by 45% registries. A wide heterogeneity is found regarding the disease coding system used, with 62% using their own or no code. Twenty-seven percent registries are established by law or to comply with regulatory requirements, while 73% as part of research projects or as an autonomous decision of clinicians or patients. Half of the registries shares data with other registries and 33% with centres of expertise, while 30% do not exchange with neither of them or with bio banks. Registries were established with no initial funding (21%) or with funding by public authorities (37%), industries and foundations (21%), research institutes and hospitals (25%), patients associations (16%) and the European Commission (15%). After the initial phase, more registries (25%) are run without specific funding; frequency of funding sources remains stable but for the European Commission, which decreases to 6%. Different procedures are applied for quality assessment, but each of them is applied by 46-58% registries. A main governing body is not present in 34% registries and 48% registries have no policy to ensure long-term sustainability. Main needs expressed are financial support, improved communication strategies and more extended geographical coverage, data sources and registry networking. The vast majority of respondents (80%) is favourable to a platform for registries and 60% doubts that new legislation can facilitate registration. Popularly expected platform services are technological tools, specific expert advice and resources.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orphanet J Rare Dis
                Orphanet J Rare Dis
                Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
                BioMed Central
                1750-1172
                2013
                23 October 2013
                : 8
                : 171
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK
                [2 ]Clinical Trials Unit, University Medical Center Freiburg, Elsässer Strasse, 2, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Neuropaediatrics and Muscle Disorders, University Medical Center Freiburg, Mathildenstrasse 1, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
                Article
                1750-1172-8-171
                10.1186/1750-1172-8-171
                3819466
                24148153
                bd64bffe-1d4e-4a15-ab61-94ddd395de39
                Copyright © 2013 Rodger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 August 2013
                : 16 October 2013
                Categories
                Research

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                rare diseases,registries,clinical trials,trial sites,care sites,centres of expertise,ctsr,reference networks,ern,care-nmd

                Comments

                Comment on this article