7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Leaf mechanical strength and photosynthetic capacity vary independently across 57 subtropical forest species with contrasting light requirements

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships.

              Global-scale quantification of relationships between plant traits gives insight into the evolution of the world's vegetation, and is crucial for parameterizing vegetation-climate models. A database was compiled, comprising data for hundreds to thousands of species for the core 'leaf economics' traits leaf lifespan, leaf mass per area, photosynthetic capacity, dark respiration, and leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, as well as leaf potassium, photosynthetic N-use efficiency (PNUE), and leaf N : P ratio. While mean trait values differed between plant functional types, the range found within groups was often larger than differences among them. Future vegetation-climate models could incorporate this knowledge. The core leaf traits were intercorrelated, both globally and within plant functional types, forming a 'leaf economics spectrum'. While these relationships are very general, they are not universal, as significant heterogeneity exists between relationships fitted to individual sites. Much, but not all, heterogeneity can be explained by variation in sample size alone. PNUE can also be considered as part of this trait spectrum, whereas leaf K and N : P ratios are only loosely related.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                New Phytologist
                New Phytol
                Wiley
                0028-646X
                1469-8137
                May 14 2019
                July 2019
                April 13 2019
                July 2019
                : 223
                : 2
                : 607-618
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems South China Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Xingke Road 723 Guangzhou 510650 China
                [2 ]College of Resources and Environment University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Yuquan Road 19A Beijing 100049 China
                [3 ]Department of Biological Sciences Macquarie University Sydney NSW 2109 Australia
                [4 ]Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation College of Forestry Guangxi University Nanning 530004 China
                [5 ]Graduate School of Agriculture Kyoto University Kyoto 606‐8502 Japan
                [6 ]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany South China Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Xingke Road 723 Guangzhou 510650 China
                [7 ]Institute of Tropical and Subtropical Ecology South China Agricultural University Wushan Road 483 Guangzhou 510642 China
                Article
                10.1111/nph.15803
                30887533
                bde7105d-29e6-4a1f-9174-bc57b9377739
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article