5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of the Comorbidity Polypharmacy Score on Clinical Outcome in Patients with Hip Fracture undergoing surgery Using Real-World Data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          BACKGROUND

          The Comorbidity Polypharmacy Score (CPS) is calculated by the number of drugs carried plus the number of comorbidities on admission and divided into three categories (minor, 0–7; moderate, 8–14; and severe, 15+). This study investigates whether CPS can predict the clinical outcomes in older patients with hip fractures undergoing surgery.

          METHODS

          This retrospective longitudinal study used a multicenter hospital-based database containing the Diagnosis Procedure Combination. Consecutive patients with hip fractures (ICD-10 codes S720 and S721) who were aged ≥65 years between April 2014 and August 2020 were included. We evaluated the predictive association between the CPS and Barthel Index (BI) efficiency. The primary outcome was defined as the BI efficiency, and the secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay.

          RESULTS

          We enrolled 11,564 patients, and 80.5% of them were female. The mean age was 83.9 ± 6.5 years. The BI efficiency was the lowest in the CPS severe group with a median [interquartile range] of 0.67 [0.10, 1.43]. The length of hospital stay was the highest in the CPS severe group, with a median of 35 [21, 58]. Additionally, multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the CPS was independently associated with the BI efficiency (β = −0.100, 95% CI: −0.040, −0.029; P < 0.001) and the length of hospital stay (β = 0.047, 95% CI: 0.199, 0.366; P < 0.001).

          CONCLUSIONS

          An increased CPS score is associated with low BI efficiency and longer length of hospital stay in patients with hip fractures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comorbidity-polypharmacy scoring facilitates outcome prediction in older trauma patients.

          To determine the association between comorbidity-polypharmacy score (CPS) and clinical outcomes in a large sample of older trauma patients, focusing on outcome prognostication. The CPS combines number of preinjury medications and comorbidities to more objectively quantify the severity of comorbid conditions. An urban tertiary care level 1 trauma center in the Midwest. Trauma patients aged 45 and older. Participants were stratified into four groups according to CPS ranges. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier/Mantel-Cox testing. Factors influencing mortality, complications, and survivor discharge destination were evaluated using analysis of covariance and multivariate logistic regression. Records for 469 individuals (mean age 62.1, mean injury severity score 9.3) were reviewed. Higher CPS is associated with greater mortality, complications, longer hospital and intensive care unit stay, and need for discharge to a facility. Higher CPS is associated with lower 90-day survival (Mantel-Cox, P < .001). Mortality was independently associated with older age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06 per year), higher injury severity score (OR = 1.19 per point), and higher CPS (OR = 1.11 per point) in multivariate analysis (all P < .01). Complications and need for discharge to a facility were independently associated with older age and higher injury severity score and CPS. CPS can be readily determined in the era of medication reconciliation. Trauma patients with CPS of 15 or greater are at greater risk of poor clinical outcomes. CPS constitutes a useful adjunct to currently available injury severity scoring tools as a predictor of morbidity, mortality, hospital resource utilization, and postdischarge disposition in older trauma patients. © 2012, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2012, The American Geriatrics Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effects of preexisting medical comorbidities on mortality and length of hospital stay in acute burn injury: evidence from a national sample of 31,338 adult patients.

            To determine whether and to what extent preexisting medical comorbidities influence mortality risk and length of hospitalization in patients with acute burn injury. The effects on mortality and length of stay of a number of important medical comorbidities have not been examined in acute burn injury. Existing studies that have investigated the effects of medical comorbidities on outcomes in acute burn injury have produced inconsistent results, chiefly due to the use of relatively small samples from single burn centers. Records of 31,338 adults who were admitted with acute burn injury to 70 burn centers from the American Burn Association National Burn Repository, were reviewed. A burn-specific list of medical comorbidities was derived from diagnoses included in the Charlson Index of Comorbidities and the Elixhauser method of comorbidity measurement. Logistic regression was used to assess the effects of preexisting medical conditions on mortality, controlling for demographic and burn injury characteristics. Ordinal least squares regression with a logarithmic transformation of the dependent variable was used to assess the relationship of comorbidities with length of stay. In-hospital mortality was significantly predicted by HIV/AIDS (odds ratio [OR] = 10.2), renal disease (OR = 5.1), liver disease (OR = 4.8), metastatic cancer (OR = 4.6), pulmonary circulation disorders (OR = 2.9), congestive heart failure (OR = 2.4), obesity (OR = 2.1), non-metastatic malignancies (OR = 2.1), peripheral vascular disorders (OR = 1.8), alcohol abuse (OR = 1.8), neurological disorders (OR = 1.6), and cardiac arrhythmias (OR = 1.5). Increased length of hospital stay among survivors was significantly predicted by paralysis (90% increase), dementia (60%), peptic ulcer disease (53%), other neurological disorders (52%), HIV/AIDS (49%), renal disease (44%), a psychiatric diagnosis (42%), cerebrovascular disease (41%), cardiac arrhythmias (40%), peripheral vascular disorders (39%), alcohol abuse (36%), valvular disease (32%), liver disease (30%), diabetes (26%), congestive heart failure (23%), drug abuse (20%), and hypertension (17%). A number of preexisting medical conditions influence outcomes in acute burn injury. Patients with preburn HIV/AIDS, metastatic cancer, liver disease, and renal disease have particularly poor prognoses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Comorbidity polypharmacy score and its clinical utility: A pragmatic practitioner's perspective

              Modern medical management of comorbid conditions has resulted in escalating use of multiple medications and the emergence of the twin phenomena of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Current understanding of how the polypharmacy in conjunction with multimorbidity influences trauma outcomes is limited, although it is known that trauma patients are at increased risk for medication-related adverse events. The comorbidity-polypharmacy score (CPS) is a simple clinical tool that quantifies the overall severity of comorbidities using the polypharmacy as a surrogate for the “intensity” of treatment necessary to adequately control chronic medical conditions. Easy to calculate, CPS is derived by counting all known pre-injury comorbid conditions and medications. CPS has been independently associated with mortality, increased risk for complications, lower functional outcomes, readmissions, and longer hospital stays. In addition, CPS may help identify older trauma patients at risk of post-emergency department undertriage. The goal of this article was to review and refine the rationale for CPS and to provide an evidence-based outline of its potential clinical applications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Clin Epidemiol
                Ann Clin Epidemiol
                ACE
                Annals of Clinical Epidemiology
                Society for Clinical Epidemiology
                2434-4338
                2023
                4 July 2023
                : 5
                : 3
                : 88-94
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Pharmacy, Kofu Municipal Hospital
                [2 ] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital
                [3 ] Department of Geriatric Medicine, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
                [4 ] Department of Pharmacy, Haradoi Hospital
                [5 ] Department of Healthcare Information Management, The University of Tokyo Hospital
                [6 ] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Hiroki Maki Department of Pharmacy, Kofu Municipal Hospital, 366 Masutsubochou, Kofu City, Yamanashi 400-0832, Japan. E-mail: makih1210@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                23012
                10.37737/ace.23012
                10944981
                38504727
                bebb7e56-f341-4002-8935-6c5017b28201
                © 2023 Society for Clinical Epidemiology

                This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.

                History
                : 19 August 2022
                : 1 June 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                comorbidity polypharmacy score,hip fracture,rehabilitation,barthel index efficiency

                Comments

                Comment on this article