17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Digital Clinical Placement for Medical Students in Response to COVID-19

      letter
      , PhD, FRCP 1 , MBChB 2 , , MBBS, MA, MEd, MRCOG 3
      Academic Medicine
      Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: The COVID-19 pandemic has closed medical schools and necessitated the remote delivery of medical education across the world. Medical educators must rapidly adapt to continue teaching students. The greatest challenge is students have increasingly limited access to patients, the key component of a clinical education. We propose a possible interim solution, in the form of a “digital clinical placement.” In this scenario, students initially receive a weekly set of interactive online cases to simulate a clinical placement. The students review a patient’s history, their physical examination findings, investigation results, and management plan on an online platform. The material is subsequently discussed at a webinar with the speciality clinician, during which students can ask and answer questions using an interactive cloud-based tool. This real-time digital interaction simulates bedside teaching and can be supplemented with patient video cases if available. A systematic review of e-learning for undergraduate health care professionals suggests that it is equivalent to traditional teaching in terms of knowledge and skills gained and student satisfaction. 1 Teaching for senior medical students, however, heavily focuses on direct patient contact, which is not easily delivered online. Patient video cases are already successfully used in pediatrics, general practice, and geriatrics. 2,3 They can increase student exposure to a wider variety of patients and provide opportunities to practice clinical reasoning skills. 3 Their use as the sole source of patient contact is untried, though, so it will be vital to evaluate and share any findings. During this global crisis, we anticipate that many of our colleagues are facing similar challenges. It is imperative, therefore, that we share our proposed solutions with a wide audience. The ability to reflect and adapt is central to maintaining and improving medical education in a rapidly changing environment. The “digital clinical placement” uses easily available technology to simulate difficult to reach patients. It is one potential solution for the temporary loss of student access to patients. Amir H. Sam, PhD, FRCPHead of undergraduate medicine, Imperial College London, and consultant physician & endocrinologist, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-9069.Kate R. Millar, MBChBClinical education fellow, Imperial College London, London, England; katerachel.millar@nhs.net; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7349-875X.Martin G.F. Lupton, MBBS, MA, MEd, MRCOGVice dean (education), Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London and Consultant Obstetrician, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, England.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction

          Background Health systems worldwide are facing shortages in health professional workforce. Several studies have demonstrated the direct correlation between the availability of health workers, coverage of health services, and population health outcomes. To address this shortage, online eLearning is increasingly being adopted in health professionals’ education. To inform policy–making, in online eLearning, we need to determine its effectiveness. Methods We performed a systematic review of the effectiveness of online eLearning through a comprehensive search of the major databases for randomised controlled trials that compared online eLearning to traditional learning or alternative learning methods. The search period was from January 2000 to August 2013. We included articles which primarily focused on students' knowledge, skills, satisfaction and attitudes toward eLearning and cost-effectiveness and adverse effects as secondary outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. Due to significant heterogeneity among the included studies, we presented our results as a narrative synthesis. Findings Fifty–nine studies, including 6750 students enrolled in medicine, dentistry, nursing, physical therapy and pharmacy studies, met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of the 50 studies testing knowledge gains found significantly higher gains in the online eLearning intervention groups compared to traditional learning, whereas 27 did not detect significant differences or found mixed results. Eleven studies did not test for differences. Six studies detected significantly higher skill gains in the online eLearning intervention groups, whilst 3 other studies testing skill gains did not detect differences between groups and 1 study showed mixed results. Twelve studies tested students' attitudes, of which 8 studies showed no differences in attitudes or preferences for online eLearning. Students' satisfaction was measured in 29 studies, 4 studies showed higher satisfaction for online eLearning and 20 studies showed no difference in satisfaction between online eLearning and traditional learning. Risk of bias was high for several of the included studies. Conclusion The current evidence base suggests that online eLearning is equivalent, possibly superior to traditional learning. These findings present a potential incentive for policy makers to cautiously encourage its adoption, while respecting the heterogeneity among the studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of patient video cases in medical education.

            Patient video cases (PVCs) are brief video recordings of patients during spontaneous or instructed activity. PVCs are true to life and can be replayed, enabling the establishment of highly interactive, contextual and safe learning environments, with a minimum of facilitation. This article describes the use of workshops in which PVCs are used to assist with the development of observational skills and clinical reasoning in medical students and postgraduates. We describe why PVCs are a valuable addition to an educator's portfolio of resources, what evidence there is for their effectiveness, how to use videos for teaching, and some practical advice and tips on their collection and storage.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Acad Med
              Acad Med
              ACM
              Academic Medicine
              Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
              1040-2446
              1938-808X
              22 April 2020
              15 April 2020
              : 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003431
              Affiliations
              [1]Head of undergraduate medicine, Imperial College London, and consultant physician & endocrinologist, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-9069.
              [2]Clinical education fellow, Imperial College London, London, England; katerachel.millar@ 123456nhs.net ; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7349-875X.
              [3]Vice dean (education), Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London and Consultant Obstetrician, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, England.
              Article
              00002
              10.1097/ACM.0000000000003431
              7179062
              c0c775db-67d1-421e-bcb2-e88aa8c40422
              Copyright © 2020 by the Association of American Medical Colleges

              This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

              History
              Categories
              Letters to the Editor

              Comments

              Comment on this article