15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current situation and future prospects for beef production in Europe — A review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The European Union (EU) is the world’s third largest producer of beef. This contributes to the economy, rural development, social life, culture and gastronomy of Europe. The diversity of breeds, animal types (cows, bulls, steers, heifers) and farming systems (intensive, extensive on permanent or temporary pastures, mixed, breeders, feeders, etc) is a strength, and a weakness as the industry is often fragmented and poorly connected. There are also societal concerns regarding animal welfare and environmental issues, despite some positive environmental impacts of farming systems. The EU is amongst the most efficient for beef production as demonstrated by a relative low production of greenhouse gases. Due to regional differences in terms of climate, pasture availability, livestock practices and farms characteristics, productivity and incomes of beef producers vary widely across regions, being among the lowest of the agricultural systems. The beef industry is facing unprecedented challenges related to animal welfare, environmental impact, origin, authenticity, nutritional benefits and eating quality of beef. These may affect the whole industry, especially its farmers. It is therefore essential to bring the beef industry together to spread best practice and better exploit research to maintain and develop an economically viable and sustainable beef industry. Meeting consumers’ expectations may be achieved by a better prediction of beef palatability using a modelling approach, such as in Australia. There is a need for accurate information and dissemination on the benefits and issues of beef for human health and for environmental impact. A better objective description of goods and services derived from livestock farming is also required. Putting into practice “agroecology” and organic farming principles are other potential avenues for the future. Different future scenarios can be written depending on the major driving forces, notably meat consumption, climate change, environmental policies and future organization of the supply chain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry.

          The relationship between consumer perception of quality and the food industry's drive to satisfy consumer needs is complex and involves many different components. Science and innovation play a major role in equipping the industry to respond to consumer concerns and expectations. This paper examines the main elements of consumer perception of meat with focus on the red meat sector. Emphasis is placed on perception at point of sale particularly the intrinsic quality cues of colour, packaging and degree of visual fat. The state of the art developments in increasing consumers' perception at this point are discussed. Experienced quality cues such as tenderness and flavour are well known as being of immense importance to consumers at point of consumption. The latest technological developments to enhance the quality experienced by consumers are discussed. The use of pre-rigor restraining techniques offers the industry a method for changing its conventional procedures of processing beef for instance. Background cues of safety, nutrition, animal welfare and sustainability are also discussed. Finally opportunities and challenges facing the industry are outlined. It is concluded that the meat industry needs to invest in and embrace an innovation agenda in order to be sustainable. It must utilise emerging scientific knowledge and take a more proactive role in setting out a research agenda.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century

              Agroecology and industrial ecology can be viewed as complementary means for reducing the environmental footprint of animal farming systems: agroecology mainly by stimulating natural processes to reduce inputs, and industrial ecology by closing system loops, thereby reducing demand for raw materials, lowering pollution and saving on waste treatment. Surprisingly, animal farming systems have so far been ignored in most agroecological thinking. On the basis of a study by Altieri, who identified the key ecological processes to be optimized, we propose five principles for the design of sustainable animal production systems: (i) adopting management practices aiming to improve animal health, (ii) decreasing the inputs needed for production, (iii) decreasing pollution by optimizing the metabolic functioning of farming systems, (iv) enhancing diversity within animal production systems to strengthen their resilience and (v) preserving biological diversity in agroecosystems by adapting management practices. We then discuss how these different principles combine to generate environmental, social and economic performance in six animal production systems (ruminants, pigs, rabbits and aquaculture) covering a long gradient of intensification. The two principles concerning economy of inputs and reduction of pollution emerged in nearly all the case studies, a finding that can be explained by the economic and regulatory constraints affecting animal production. Integrated management of animal health was seldom mobilized, as alternatives to chemical drugs have only recently been investigated, and the results are not yet transferable to farming practices. A number of ecological functions and ecosystem services (recycling of nutrients, forage yield, pollination, resistance to weed invasion, etc.) are closely linked to biodiversity, and their persistence depends largely on maintaining biological diversity in agroecosystems. We conclude that the development of such ecology-based alternatives for animal production implies changes in the positions adopted by technicians and extension services, researchers and policymakers. Animal production systems should not only be considered holistically, but also in the diversity of their local and regional conditions. The ability of farmers to make their own decisions on the basis of the close monitoring of system performance is most important to ensure system sustainability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Asian-Australas J Anim Sci
                Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci
                Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
                Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
                1011-2367
                1976-5517
                July 2018
                24 May 2018
                : 31
                : 7
                : 1017-1035
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
                [2 ]Bordeaux Science Agro, 1 cours du Général de Gaulle, CS 40201, 33175 Gradignan, France
                [3 ]Institut de l’Elevage, Economie des exploitations, Animatrice du réseau d’élevage du Bassin Charolais et du réseau Rustique, 9 allée Pierre de Fermat, 63170 France
                [4 ]Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
                [5 ]Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, UK
                Author notes
                [a]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [* ]Corresponding Author: Jean-François Hocquette, Tel: +33-4-73-62-42-53, Fax: +33-4-73-62-45-19, E-mail: jean-francois.hocquette@ 123456inra.fr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2409-3881
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5776-7566
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0475-4793
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-7302
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-7654
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2690-529X
                Article
                ajas-31-7-1017
                10.5713/ajas.18.0196
                6039334
                29807416
                c10689b5-3a77-4284-aa9d-40758df4e29a
                Copyright © 2018 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 March 2018
                : 10 April 2018
                : 26 April 2018
                Categories
                Review Paper

                beef,prospects,europe,consumer,supply chain
                beef, prospects, europe, consumer, supply chain

                Comments

                Comment on this article