2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protocol for the evaluation of the population-level impact of Zimbabwe’s prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission program option B+: a community based serial cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          WHO recommends that HIV infected women receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) minimally during pregnancy and breastfeeding (“Option B”), or ideally throughout their lives regardless of clinical stage (“Option B+”) (Coovadia et al., Lancet 379:221–228, 2012). Although these recommendations were based on clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of ART during pregnancy and breastfeeding, the population-level effectiveness of Option B+ is unknown, as are retention on ART beyond the immediate post-partum period, and the relative impact and cost-effectiveness of Option B+ compared to Option A (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:148–151, 2013; Ahmed et al., Curr Opin HIV AIDS 8:473–488, 2013). To address these issues, we conducted an impact evaluation of Zimbabwe’s prevention of mother to child transmission programme conducted between 2011 and 2018 using serial, community-based cross-sectional serosurveys, which spanned changes in WHO recommendations. Here we describe the rationale for the design and analysis.

          Methods/design

          Our method is to survey mother-infant pairs residing in the catchment areas of 157 health facilities randomly selected from 5 of 10 provinces in Zimbabwe. We collect questionnaires, blood samples from mothers and babies for HIV antibody and viral load testing, and verbal autopsies for deceased mothers/babies. Using this approach, we collected data from two previous time points: 2012 (pre-Option A standard of care), 2014 (post-Option A / pre-Option B+) and will collect a third round of data in 2017–18 (post Option B+ implementation) to monitor population-level trends in mother-to-child transmission of HIV (MTCT) and HIV-free infant survival. In addition, we will collect detailed information on facility level factors that may influence service delivery and costs.

          Discussion

          Although the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy (ART) during pregnancy and breastfeeding for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) has been well-documented in randomized trials, little evidence exists on the population-level impact and cost-effectiveness of Option B+ or the influence of the facility on implementation (Siegfried et al., Cochrane Libr 7:CD003510, 2017). This study will provide essential data on these gaps and will provide estimates on retention in care among Option B+ clients after the breastfeeding period.

          Trial registration

          NCT03388398 Retrospectively registered January 3, 2018.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A Surprising Prevention Success: Why Did the HIV Epidemic Decline in Zimbabwe?

          Daniel Halperin and colleagues examine reasons for the remarkable decline in HIV in Zimbabwe, in the context of severe social, political, and economic disruption.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Impact of an Innovative Approach to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV — Malawi, July 2011–September 2012

            Antiretroviral medications can reduce rates of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to less than 5% (1). However, in 2011, only 57% of HIV-infected pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received a World Health Organization (WHO)–recommended regimen for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), and an estimated 300,000 infants acquired HIV infection from their mothers in sub-Saharan Africa; 15,700 (5.2%) of these infants were born in Malawi (2). An important barrier to PMTCT in Malawi is the limited laboratory capacity for CD4 cell count, which is recommended by WHO to determine which antiretroviral medications to start (3). In the third quarter of 2011, the Malawi Ministry of Health (MOH) implemented an innovative approach (called “Option B+”), in which all HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women are eligible for lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) regardless of CD4 count (4). Since that time, several countries (including Rwanda, Uganda, and Haiti) have adopted the Option B+ policy, and WHO was prompted to release a technical update in April 2012 describing the advantages and challenges of this approach as well as the need to evaluate country experiences with Option B+ (5). Using data collected through routine program supervision, this report is the first to summarize Malawi’s experience implementing Option B+ under the direction of the MOH and supported by the Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator (OGAC) through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). In Malawi, the number of pregnant and breastfeeding women started on ART per quarter increased by 748%, from 1,257 in the second quarter of 2011 (before Option B+ implementation) to 10,663 in the third quarter of 2012 (1 year after implementation). Of the 2,949 women who started ART under Option B+ in the third quarter of 2011 and did not transfer care, 2,267 (77%) continue to receive ART at 12 months; this retention rate is similar to the rate for all adults in the national program. Option B+ is an important innovation that could accelerate progress in Malawi and other countries toward the goal of eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV worldwide. Antiretroviral medications can be provided to improve a patient’s own health, prevent vertical HIV transmission from mother to infant, and/or prevent horizontal transmission to an uninfected sex partner. In most resource-limited settings, ART eligibility is based on CD4 cell count or clinical staging. For pregnant women with CD4 ≤350 cells/mm3 or at WHO clinical stage 3 or 4, the 2010 WHO PMTCT recommendations include lifelong ART. For HIV-infected pregnant women not eligible for ART, either of two prophylaxis options (called “Option A” and “Option B”) is recommended. Option A involves prophylaxis with a single drug, zidovudine (AZT), during pregnancy, and additional antiretroviral medications during labor, delivery, and the postpartum period. Option B involves triple-drug ART during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Both options include additional antiretroviral medications for infants (1). In Malawi, the MOH determined the health sector did not have the laboratory and infrastructure capacity to provide universal access to CD4 cell count testing needed to successfully implement either of the two recommended options. Instead, they proposed a modified Option B (called “Option B+”), in which all confirmed HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women are offered lifelong ART regardless of CD4 count or clinical stage. This policy streamlined the process of ART initiation and had the potential to improve maternal health, facilitate access to PMTCT and ART, reduce HIV transmission risk to uninfected male partners, and provide protection against vertical HIV transmission in future pregnancies (4,6). Implementation of Option B+ also required integration of ART into all antenatal care (ANC) settings, training of nearly all health-care workers in a new integrated curriculum, and a change in the adult first-line ART regimen to one that included the antiretroviral medication efavirenz.* Implementation was facilitated by existing task-shifting policies that allow clinical officers, medical assistants, and nurses to start ART (4). Every integrated PMTCT/ART site in Malawi is visited quarterly by members of a nationally coordinated supervision team composed of MOH service providers, supervisors, supporting partners, and CDC-Malawi staff. Direct supervision of every site in every quarter is the key feature of the national HIV program. Innovative patient registers have been created to permit longitudinal follow-up and cohort analyses for patients receiving antenatal and HIV care. Data collected during these supervision visits include the number of persons started on ART, the reason for starting ART, and, of those started on ART in previous quarters, the number of patients retained in care. These facility-level aggregated data are returned to the central-level MOH, entered into a database, cleaned, and then analyzed to produce MOH’s Quarterly HIV Programme Reports,† on which this report is based. Implementation of Option B+ required training of 4,839 health-care workers and resulted in decentralization of ART to all health centers with ANC, with an increase from 303 ART sites in June 2011 to 641 integrated PMTCT/ART sites in September 2012 (Figure 1). After implementation of Option B+ began in July 2011, the total number of all persons started on ART per quarter increased by 61%, from 18,442 in the second quarter of 2011 to 29,707 in the third quarter 2012. Implementation of Option B+ resulted in a 748% increase in the number of pregnant and breastfeeding women starting ART, from 1,257 in the second quarter of 2011 (representing 5% of all new ART initiations) to 10,663 in the third quarter of 2012 (35% of all new ART initiations) (Figure 2). Of the women starting ART in the third quarter of 2011 (the first quarter of Option B+ implementation) who did not transfer care during follow up, 77% continue to receive ART at 12 months (Figure 3). This rate is similar to the 80% 12-month ART retention rate observed among adults who initiated ART in the second quarter of 2011 (the last quarter before Option B+ implementation). Editorial Note In June 2011, PEPFAR (under the leadership of OGAC) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS launched a global plan to virtually eliminate mother-to-child transmission of HIV with the goal of reducing new HIV infections in children by 90% by 2015.§ In Malawi, under the new policy, the number of pregnant and breastfeeding women started on ART has increased and the retention rate has remained similar to the rate for adults continuing to receive ART at 12 months before Option B+ implementation. Option B+ is an important innovation that could accelerate progress in Malawi and other countries toward the goal of eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV worldwide. Barriers to ART provision for pregnant women in resource-limited settings include the need for CD4 cell count, distance between ANC sites where HIV diagnosis is made and ART sites where treatment is started, transportation costs, and human resource constraints that lead to long waiting times and scheduling difficulties (3). The removal of the barrier of CD4 cell count, decentralization of ART into all ANC sites, and the training of nearly all nurses and clinical officers on the new integrated PMTCT/ART guidelines facilitated the increase in the number of pregnant and breastfeeding women started on ART. Implementation of Option B+ in Malawi enabled women to receive ART and ANC services in the same clinic and from the same provider without adversely affecting retention in care. The seven-fold increase in the number of pregnant and breastfeeding women started on ART per quarter during the first year of Option B+ has multiple potential benefits to mothers, their partners, and their children. For women, ART provides protection for their own health and, therefore, with expansion of ART coverage, a substantial reduction in mortality through the postpartum period can be expected (7,8). For HIV-uninfected sexual partners, ART offers protection from HIV transmission. In Malawi, one third of HIV-infected women are estimated to be in stable relationships with HIV-uninfected partners; studies suggest a substantial reduction in HIV transmission within these relationships in the setting of effective ART (6,9). For children of current and future pregnancies, ART provides protection from HIV infection during pregnancy and breastfeeding. The mother-to-child transmission rate for women on ART is expected to be reduced, from approximately 40% without intervention to less than 5%. With PEPFAR funding, CDC is supporting a nationally representative prospective evaluation to estimate the mother-to-child transmission rate in Malawi (1). Important challenges and questions remain. Evaluations to assess the cost-effectiveness of this approach are needed, and although 12-month retention rates are reassuring, lifelong ART adherence will need to be maintained. Although high-quality HIV testing is accepted by nearly all women at ANC in resource-limited settings, the Malawi MOH estimates that failure to ascertain maternal HIV status at ANC is now responsible for 54% of new infant infections in Malawi, likely as a result of irregular availability of test kits and poor quality assurance of rapid testing at ANC sites. (10; Frank Chimbwandira, Malawi MOH, personal communication, 2012). With PEPFAR funding, CDC is supporting birth defects surveillance in Malawi and elsewhere because limited data currently are available on the possible adverse effects of efavirenz-based ART regimens on infants exposed in early gestation (5). The success of Option B+ in increasing ART coverage demonstrates the combined effect of streamlined ART initiation, decentralized and integrated service delivery, policy changes to allow nurses to start ART, and direct supervision of every site. Continued progress in Malawi demands consistent provision of high-quality HIV testing in ANC and continuing efforts to ensure lifelong ART adherence among women started on ART through Option B+. What is already known on this topic? Mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be reduced to less than 5% with antiretroviral medications. However many HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women in sub-Saharan Africa still do not receive services to prevent transmission to their infants. An important barrier is the limited laboratory capacity for CD4 cell count, which is recommended by the World Health Organization to determine which antiretroviral medications to start in pregnant and breastfeeding women. What is added by this report? In 2011, Malawi implemented a new policy (Option B+) to provide all HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women with lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) regardless of CD4 count. The number of pregnant and breastfeeding women started on ART increased by 748%, from 1,257 in the second quarter of 2011 (before Option B+ implementation) to 10,663 in the third quarter of 2012 (1 year after implementation). What are the implications for public health practice? Option B+ is an important innovation that could accelerate progress in Malawi and other countries toward the goal of eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV worldwide.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risks and benefits of lifelong antiretroviral treatment for pregnant and breastfeeding women: a review of the evidence for the Option B+ approach.

              Considerable debate has emerged on whether Option B+ (B+), initiation of lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all pregnant and breastfeeding women, is the best approach to achieving elimination of mother-to-child-transmission. However, direct evidence and experience with B+ is limited. We review the current evidence informing the proposed benefits and potential risks of the B+ approach, distinguishing individual health concerns for mother and child from program delivery and public health issues. For mothers and infants, B+ may offer significant benefits for transmission prevention and maternal health. However, several studies raise concerns about the safety of ART exposure to fetuses and infants, as well as adherence challenges for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers. For program delivery and public health, B+ presents distinct advantages in terms of transmission prevention to uninfected partners and increased simplicity potentially improving program feasibility, access, uptake, and retention in care. Despite being more costly in the short-term, B+ will likely be cost effective over time. This review provides a detailed analysis of risks and benefits of B+. As national programs adopt this approach, it will be critical to carefully assess both short-term and long-term maternal and infant outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                akoyuncu@berkeley.edu
                Mi-Suk.KangDufour@ucsf.edu
                smccoy@berkeley.edu
                sbautista@insp.mx
                ralucabuzdugan@gmail.com
                connie@ceshhar.co.zw
                jeffrey@ceshhar.co.zw
                mushavia@yahoo.co.uk
                amahomva@pedaids.org
                Frances.Cowan@lstmed.ac.uk
                npadian@berkeley.edu
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                8 January 2019
                8 January 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2181 7878, GRID grid.47840.3f, University of California Berkeley, ; Berkeley, USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Division of Prevention Science, , University of California San Francisco, ; San Francisco, USA
                [3 ]Consorcio de Investigación Sobre VIH/SIDA/TB, Cuernavaca, Mexico
                [4 ]Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
                [5 ]GRID grid.415818.1, Ministry of Health and Child Care, ; Harare, Zimbabwe
                [6 ]Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Harare, Zimbabwe
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9764, GRID grid.48004.38, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, ; Liverpool, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-6279
                Article
                2146
                10.1186/s12884-018-2146-x
                6325877
                30621615
                c1200b04-4b73-476c-b82b-9fa166501264
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 4 June 2018
                : 12 December 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009633, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development;
                Award ID: R01HD080492
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                impact evaluation,mother-to-child transmission of hiv (mtct),prevention of mother-to-child hiv transmission (pmtct),antiretroviral therapy (art)

                Comments

                Comment on this article