Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sensitivity of fetal RHD screening for safe guidance of targeted anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis: prospective cohort study of a nationwide programme in the Netherlands

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To determine the accuracy of non-invasive fetal testing for the RHD gene in week 27 of pregnancy as part of an antenatal screening programme to restrict anti-D immunoglobulin use to women carrying a child positive for RHD.

          Design Prospectively monitoring of fetal RHD testing accuracy compared with serological cord blood typing on introduction of the test. Fetal RHD testing was performed with a duplex real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, with cell-free fetal DNA isolated from 1 mL of maternal plasma The study period was between 4 July 2011 and 7 October 2012. The proportion of women participating in screening was determined.

          Setting Nationwide screening programme, the Netherlands. Tests are performed in a centralised setting.

          Participants 25 789 RhD negative pregnant women.

          Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, and false positive rate of fetal RHD testing compared with serological cord blood typing; proportion of technical failures; and compliance to the screening programme.

          Results A fetal RHD test result and serological cord blood result were available for 25 789 pregnancies. Sensitivity for detection of fetal RHD was 99.94% (95% confidence interval 99.89% to 99.97%) and specificity was 97.74% (97.43% to 98.02%). Nine false negative results for fetal RHD testing were registered (0.03%, 95% confidence interval 0.01% to 0.06%). In two cases these were due to technical failures. False positive fetal RHD testing results were registered for 225 samples (0.87%, 0.76% to 0.99%). Weak RhD expression was shown in 22 of these cases, justifying anti-D immunoglobulin use. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.91% (95% confidence interval 99.82% to 99.95%) and 98.60% (98.40% to 98.77%), respectively. More than 98% of the women participated in the screening programme.

          Conclusions Fetal RHD testing in week 27 of pregnancy as part of a national antenatal screening programme is highly reliable and can be used to target both antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Rh blood group system: a review.

          The Rh blood group system is one of the most polymorphic and immunogenic systems known in humans. In the past decade, intense investigation has yielded considerable knowledge of the molecular background of this system. The genes encoding 2 distinct Rh proteins that carry C or c together with either E or e antigens, and the D antigen, have been cloned, and the molecular bases of many of the antigens and of the phenotypes have been determined. A related protein, the Rh glycoprotein is essential for assembly of the Rh protein complex in the erythrocyte membrane and for expression of Rh antigens. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of several aspects of the Rh blood group system, including the confusing terminology, progress in molecular understanding, and how this developing knowledge can be used in the clinical setting. Extensive documentation is provided to enable the interested reader to obtain further information. (Blood. 2000;95:375-387)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn.

            When an RhD negative mother is exposed to the RhD positive red cells (usually as transplacental haemorrhage), she develops allo-anti-D which crosses the placenta and then results in the destruction of fetal red cells. Clinical manifestations of RhD haemolytic disease (HDN) range from asymptomatic mild anaemia to hydrops fetalis or stillbirth associated with severe anaemia and jaundice. HDN was a significant cause of fetal mortality and morbidity until the introduction of amniocentesis, intrauterine transfusion, controlled early delivery and exchange transfusion in the management of severely alloimmunised women and their fetuses. The objective of monitoring alloimmunised women is to identify fetal anaemia and prevent the development of life-threatening hydrops. Evaluation involves assessing the history of previous pregnancies; serial estimation of maternal anti-D levels; serial ultrasound measurements; serial amniocentesis; fetal blood sampling, and intrauterine transfusion when indicated. Diagnostic genotyping by DNA-based methods can identify at-risk RhD positive fetuses early in gestation. Identification of transplacental haemorrhage (TPH) as the stimulus for anti-D antibody production led to the development of anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis for at-risk RhD negative women who are not already alloimmunised. Prevention includes administration of anti-D immunoglobulin for any event associated with TPH during pregnancy, and at delivery of an RhD positive infant. Prophylactic routine administration of anti-D immunoglobulin at 28 (and 34) weeks gestation, in addition to the above, has reduced alloimmunisation to <1% of RhD negative women carrying an RhD positive fetus.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

              Haemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn (HDFN) is caused by maternal alloimmunization against red blood cell antigens. In severe cases, HDFN may lead to fetal anaemia with a risk for fetal death and to severe forms of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia with a risk for kernicterus. Most severe cases are caused by anti-D, despite the introduction of antental and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis. In general, red blood cell antibody screening programmes are aimed to detect maternal alloimmunization early in pregnancy to facilitate the identification of high-risk cases to timely start antenatal and postnatal treatment. In this review, an overview of the clinical relevance of red cell alloantibodies in relation to occurrence of HDFN and recent views on prevention, screening and treatment options of HDFN are provided.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: head of department
                Role: PhD candidate
                Role: epidemiologist
                Role: senior researcher
                Role: account manager
                Role: senior analyst
                Role: senior analyst
                Role: program coordinator
                Role: associate medical director and former gynaecologist
                Role: resident in obstetrics and gynaecology
                Role: head of department
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2016
                7 November 2016
                : 355
                : i5789
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [2 ]Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research and Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
                [3 ]Department of Immunohematology Diagnostic Services, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [4 ]University Medical Center Utrecht, Division Woman and Baby, Department of Obstetrics, Utrecht, Netherlands
                [5 ]Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Department of Child Health, Leiden, Netherlands
                [6 ]National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Service for vaccine provision and prevention programs, Bilthoven, Netherlands
                [7 ]National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Center for population screening, Bilthoven, Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: C E van der Schoot Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research, PO Box 9190, 1006 AD Amsterdam, Netherlands e.vanderschoot@ 123456sanquin.nl
                Article
                dehm033419
                10.1136/bmj.i5789
                5098549
                27821701
                c253e548-789a-4f3d-bf86-721389251023
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.

                History
                : 05 October 2016
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article