6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Update Alert 7: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults

      other
      , MD, MPP, , MD, MCR, , MLIS, AHIP
      Annals of Internal Medicine
      American College of Physicians

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We searched MEDLINE (Ovid) weekly from 27 October to 23 November 2020 using the same search strategy as described in the original review (1). We did not limit the search by language. This search update yielded 48 results (de-duplicated), and after an independent dual-review process, we identified 14 new studies meeting our inclusion criteria (8 observational and 6 new systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses) (2–15). These studies are all relevant to key question (KQ) 2 about the association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) use and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, and they support our prior conclusion that ACEI or ARB use is not associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 illness. Two systematic reviews also address KQ1, adding support to our prior conclusion that ACEI or ARB use is not associated with an increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (11, 14). Evidence Summary In total, 9 primary studies (8 observational and 1 randomized controlled trial) have met our inclusion criteria for KQ1 to date, including those identified in the original review, previous update alerts, and the most recent search described earlier (16–24). In total, 78 primary studies (77 observational and 1 randomized controlled trial) have met our inclusion criteria for KQ2 to date, excluding 1 retracted study (2–9, 16, 22–53-54–91). We have not identified any primary studies addressing KQ3 about the benefits and harms of initiating ACEIs or ARBs during COVID-19 disease (that is, new users). Key Question 1: Does the Use of ACEIs and ARBs Before Infection With SARS-CoV-2 Increase the Risk for COVID-19? Evidence suggests that ACEI or ARB use is not associated with a higher likelihood of positive SARS-CoV-2 test results. Our confidence in this finding is high (rather than moderate as we previously concluded). New evidence since the publication of our original review includes results from a randomized controlled trial and 4 large database studies that included patients with a mix of disease severity (16–19, 23). These studies consistently found that ACEI or ARB use was not associated with a higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, findings which are further supported by 5 systematic reviews or meta-analyses (11, 14, 92–94). Because we consider these findings to be stable (meaning that future studies are likely to have the same results), we will no longer do literature surveillance on this KQ and will retire it from our living review. Key Question 2: Is Use of ACEIs and ARBs Associated With More Severe COVID-19 Illness? Evidence suggests that use of ACEIs or ARBs before COVID-19 illness is not associated with increased severity. Our confidence in this finding remains high after incorporating new evidence since the publication of our original review given the consistency of results across studies, representing adults from several geographic regions during different phases of the pandemic. Results are supported by several systematic reviews or meta-analyses (92–112). Because we consider these findings to be stable (meaning that future studies are likely to have the same results), we will no longer do routine literature surveillance for this KQ. We have identified 3 in-progress trials that are aimed at addressing this KQ (Supplement Table), and we will continue to monitor these trials for updates monthly and provide a brief status update quarterly (113–115). If the results would change our conclusions or strength of evidence assessment, we will provide an updated evidence synthesis. Key Question 3: What Are the Benefits and Harms of Initiating ACEI or ARB Treatment for Patients With COVID-19? We have identified 5 in-progress trials that are aimed at addressing this KQ (Supplement Table) (116–120). We will monitor these trials for updates monthly and provide a brief status update quarterly. When results are available, we will provide an updated evidence synthesis. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Risk of Covid-19

          Abstract Background There is concern about the potential of an increased risk related to medications that act on the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in patients exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), because the viral receptor is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Methods We assessed the relation between previous treatment with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, or thiazide diuretics and the likelihood of a positive or negative result on Covid-19 testing as well as the likelihood of severe illness (defined as intensive care, mechanical ventilation, or death) among patients who tested positive. Using Bayesian methods, we compared outcomes in patients who had been treated with these medications and in untreated patients, overall and in those with hypertension, after propensity-score matching for receipt of each medication class. A difference of at least 10 percentage points was prespecified as a substantial difference. Results Among 12,594 patients who were tested for Covid-19, a total of 5894 (46.8%) were positive; 1002 of these patients (17.0%) had severe illness. A history of hypertension was present in 4357 patients (34.6%), among whom 2573 (59.1%) had a positive test; 634 of these patients (24.6%) had severe illness. There was no association between any single medication class and an increased likelihood of a positive test. None of the medications examined was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of severe illness among patients who tested positive. Conclusions We found no substantial increase in the likelihood of a positive test for Covid-19 or in the risk of severe Covid-19 among patients who tested positive in association with five common classes of antihypertensive medications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Association of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19

            Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Blockers and the Risk of Covid-19

              Abstract Background A potential association between the use of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) has not been well studied. Methods We carried out a population-based case–control study in the Lombardy region of Italy. A total of 6272 case patients in whom infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was confirmed between February 21 and March 11, 2020, were matched to 30,759 beneficiaries of the Regional Health Service (controls) according to sex, age, and municipality of residence. Information about the use of selected drugs and patients’ clinical profiles was obtained from regional databases of health care use. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between drugs and infection, with adjustment for confounders, were estimated by means of logistic regression. Results Among both case patients and controls, the mean (±SD) age was 68±13 years, and 37% were women. The use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs was more common among case patients than among controls, as was the use of other antihypertensive and non-antihypertensive drugs, and case patients had a worse clinical profile. Use of ARBs or ACE inhibitors did not show any association with Covid-19 among case patients overall (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.86 to 1.05] for ARBs and 0.96 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.07] for ACE inhibitors) or among patients who had a severe or fatal course of the disease (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.10] for ARBs and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.21] for ACE inhibitors), and no association between these variables was found according to sex. Conclusions In this large, population-based study, the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs was more frequent among patients with Covid-19 than among controls because of their higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease. However, there was no evidence that ACE inhibitors or ARBs affected the risk of COVID-19.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Intern Med
                Ann Intern Med
                aim
                Annals of Internal Medicine
                American College of Physicians
                0003-4819
                1539-3704
                5 January 2021
                : L20-1446
                Affiliations
                [01]VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (K.M., D.K., K.V.)
                Author notes
                Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.

                Disclosures: Authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=L20-1446.

                Corresponding Author: Katherine Mackey, MD, MPP, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR 97239; e-mail, Katherine.Mackey@ 123456va.gov .
                Article
                aim-olf-L201446
                10.7326/L20-1446
                7791405
                33395346
                c279799a-00d5-4f74-a3c1-fd5261b1e27f

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use for research, analyses, and text and data mining through PubMed Central. Acknowledgement of the original source shall include a notice similar to the following: "© 2020 American College of Physicians. Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited." These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                Categories
                Letters
                Update Alerts
                early, Currently Online First
                coronavirus, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

                Comments

                Comment on this article