3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stapler Malfunctions in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the MAUDE Database

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Staple line leaks are a serious problem in bariatric surgery and a major cause of serious morbidity and mortality. Adverse events caused by medical devices are reported to the Food and Drug Administration which maintains the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. We examined adverse stapler events reported to the MAUDE database, specifically with regards to bariatric surgery.

          Methods:

          The MAUDE database was queried for adverse events caused by staplers between January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020; events reported by Intuitive, Ethicon, and Medtronic/Covidien; and limited our search to “gastric bypass”, “sleeve gastrectomy”, “stapler malfunction” combined with each company.

          Results:

          There were 883 adverse events reported for Medtronic, 353 for Ethicon, and 35 for Intuitive. Approximately 3.5 million staple reloads sold in the study period. The reported misfire rate for Medtronic was 0.04% and for Ethicon was 0.02%. Data for Intuitive was unavailable. The most common reported event for Medtronic was failure to fire (n = 349), followed by misfire (n = 186). For Ethicon, the most common event was failure to fire (n = 146), followed by mechanical problems (n = 27). The most common event with the Intuitive stapler was leak (n = 10) and bleeding from staple line (n = 8).

          Conclusions:

          Stapler malfunction is a very rare event in metabolic and bariatric surgery. All of the major stapler producers have transitioned to powered staplers with excellent safety profiles. Open and honest reporting about stapler malfunction is essential to determine the true safety of these ubiquitous devices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States

          Metabolic and bariatric surgery, despite being the only effective durable treatment for obesity, remains underused as approximately 1% of all patients who qualify undergo surgery. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery created a Numbers Taskforce to specify annual rate of utilization for obesity treatment interventions and to determine if patients in need are receiving appropriate therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The science of stapling and leaks.

            Staple-line leaks represent an unwanted, yet seemingly unavoidable, complication of stapling associated with bariatric surgery. Although, "folk legends" abound as to precluding leaks, little has been written based on basic research and understanding of stapling mechanics. This article reviews the history of stapling and discusses the implications of understanding the biomechanics of stapling living tissue. Finally, three leak studies evaluating ways to optimize staple-line strength are presented, and a large bariatric clinical series is reviewed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review

              Background Staple-line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remain a concerning complication. Staple-line buttressing is largely adopted as an acceptable reinforcement but data regarding leaks have been equivocal. This study compared staple-line leaks in five reinforcement options during LSG: no reinforcement (NO-SLR), oversewing (suture), nonabsorbable bovine pericardial strips (BPS), tissue sealant or fibrin glue (Seal), or absorbable polymer membrane (APM). Methods This systematic review study of articles published between 2012 and 2016 regarding LSG leak rates aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Variables of interest included leak rates, bleeding, and complications in addition to surgical and population parameters. An independent Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the number of patients with and without leaks for the different reinforcement options. Results Of the 1633 articles identified, 148 met inclusion criteria and represented 40,653 patients. Differences in age (older in APM; p = 0.001), starting body mass index (lower in Suture; p = 0.008), and distance from pylorus (closer in BPS; p = 0.04) were observed between groups, but mean bougie size was equivalent. The overall leak rate of 1.5% (607 leaks) ranged from 0.7% for APM (significantly lower than all groups; p ≤ 0.007 for next lowest leak rate) to 2.7% (BPS). Conclusions This systematic review of staple-line leaks following LSG demonstrated a significantly lower rate using APM staple-line reinforcement as compared to oversewing, use of sealants, BPS reinforcement, or no reinforcement. Variation in surgical technique may also contribute to leak rates. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JSLS
                JSLS
                jsls
                JSLS
                JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
                Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (Miami, FL )
                1086-8089
                1938-3797
                Jan-Mar 2022
                : 26
                : 1
                : e2021.00074
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.
                Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.
                Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.
                Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.
                Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.
                Universidad Autonoma Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.
                Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Dr. Benjamin Clapp, 1700 N Mesa, El Paso, TX, USA, 79902, Telephone: 915-269-2708, Fax: 915-351-6048, E-mail: B_clapp1@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                JSLS.2021.00074
                10.4293/JSLS.2021.00074
                8896815
                c2e5a646-f02f-44d1-9533-afa4c54e65e4
                © 2022 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.

                History
                Categories
                Research Article

                Surgery
                bariatric surgery,complications,maude,stapler malfunction,stapler misfire
                Surgery
                bariatric surgery, complications, maude, stapler malfunction, stapler misfire

                Comments

                Comment on this article