13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The changing public image of smoking in the United States: 1964-2014.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tobacco use behaviors in the U.S. have changed significantly over the past century. After a steep increase in cigarette use rates over the first half of the 20th century, adult smoking prevalence rates started declining from their peak reached in 1964. Improved understanding of the health risks of smoking has been aided by the U.S. Surgeon General's Reports, issued on a nearly annual basis starting in 1964. Among the many forces driving down smoking prevalence were the recognition of tobacco use as an addiction and cause of cancer, along with concerns about the ill effects of breathing secondhand smoke. These factors contributed to the declining social acceptance of smoking, especially with the advent of legal restrictions on smoking in public spaces, mass media counter-marketing campaigns, and higher taxes on cigarettes. This article reviews some of the forces that have helped change the public image of smoking, focusing on the 50 years since the 1964 Surgeon General's Report on smoking and health.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
          Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology
          1538-7755
          1055-9965
          Jan 2014
          : 23
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Authors' Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and History Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
          Article
          23/1/32 NIHMS541120
          10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0798
          3894634
          24420984
          c5327ec1-c634-4e91-91b8-efc108ca928d
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article