Disaster is a sudden, calamitous event, bringing great damage, loss, destruction and
devastation to life and property. The damage caused by disasters is immeasurable and
influences the mental, socioeconomic, political, and cultural state of the affected
area. Disasters are events that inflict great damage, destruction, and human suffering.
Their origin can be natural, such as earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes, or of human
origin: accidents and terrorist acts.
India has been vulnerable to natural disasters on account of its unique geo-climatic
conditions. Floods, droughts, cyclones, earthquakes, and landslides have been recurrent
phenomena. About 60% of the landmass is prone to earthquakes of various intensities,
over 40 million hectares is prone to floods, about 8% of the total area is prone to
cyclones, and 68% of the area is susceptible to drought. The loss in terms of private,
community, and public assets has been astronomical. India has been struck by numerous
disasters in the recent past including, among the major ones, the Bangalore circus
tragedy (1981), Bhopal gas tragedy (1984), Gujarat cyclone (1998), Orissa super cyclone
(1999), Gujarat earthquake (2001), annual flooding in large parts of the country during
the monsoon, and the tsunami in 2004. The response to disasters has gradually improved
over the years, as lessons have been learnt from each disaster and adapted. Factors
that have inhibited the response to disasters in the past include, lack of a national-level
plan policy, absence of an institutional framework at the center / state / district
level, poor intersectoral coordination, lack of an early warning system, slow response
from the relief agencies, lack of trained / dedicated search and rescue teams, and
poor community empowerment.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has been in the forefront of the response to emergencies,
and mental health care is an important part of this response.[1] The importance that
WHO attributes to dealing with psychological traumas of war and disasters have been
highlighted by the resolution of the World Health Assembly, in May, 2005, when it
passed the resolution of the WHO Executive Board, in January 2005, and urged support
for the implementation of programs to repair the psychological damage of war, conflict,
and natural disasters.[2
]
Human responses to natural hazards are assumed to be rooted primarily in the way individuals
think, behave, and interact in the environment.[2] Disasters that are unexpected,
occur suddenly, causing widespread damage, and are understood to be traumatic and
associated with a high degree of psychological disturbance.[3
4]. The survivors are most often seen as having significantly disrupted lives, which
require lengthy periods of recovery.
The disaster management approach requires administrative support and medical intervention,
apart from psychosocial intervention. As per Indian law, the District Collector has
the overall authority for all the administrative issues in the district. The District
Collector is the key focal point in the launch and implementation of any relief efforts
in a district. The social context of healing is equally important and cannot be overemphasized,
especially the unique aspect of the communities of the SEA (South East Asian Region),
which influences their response to suffering, ability to cope with loss, time of recovery,
and so on. Relief effort and disaster preparedness plans must take into consideration
the ethnic and cultural aspects and needs. The mental health service needs of large
proportions of the affected population can be served by relief and rescue workers
and healthcare providers, as well as by strengthening and supporting the sociocultural
coping mechanisms of the local communities. Relief and rescue workers are, as a general
pattern, sensitive to the emotional and psychological needs of people in distress.
In the Indian scenario the experiences of disasters, especially natural disasters,
have yielded a wealth of information. The country has integrated administrative machinery
for the management of disasters at the National, State, District, and Sub-District
levels. The basic responsibility of undertaking rescue, relief, and rehabilitation
measures in the event of natural disasters, as at present, is that of the concerned
State Governments. The Central Government supplements the efforts of the State by
providing financial and logistic support. Besides this, the Indian Armed Forces are
called upon to intervene and take on specific tasks if the situation is beyond the
capability of civil administration. In practice, the Armed Forces are the core of
the government's response capacity and tend to be the first responders of the Government
of India in a major disaster. The Armed Forces have historically played a major role
in emergency support functions such as communications, search and rescue operations,
health and medical facilities, transportation, power, food and civil supplies, and
public works and engineering, especially in the immediate aftermath of a disaster.
TYPES OF DISASTERS
Broadly, disasters are of two types - ‘Natural’ and ‘Man-made’. Based on the devastation,
these are further classified into major / minor natural disasters or major / minor
man-made disasters. Natural disaster: Natural disasters such as earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, typhoons, and cyclones affect many counties in Asia. A review of the natural
disasters and mental health in Asia highlighted the extensive, frequent, and damaging
nature of such events. Man-made disasters: These include transport and industrial
accidents, such as, air and train crashes, chemical spills, and building collapses.
Not everybody responds to a disaster in the same way, as there are differences based
on various experiential factors and circumstances.
Pre-traumatic factors: The pre-traumatic factors could be the ongoing life stress,
lack of social support, pre-existing psychiatric disorder; other pre-traumatic factors,
including: low socioeconomic status reported abuse in childhood, play an report of
other adverse childhood factors, family history of psychiatric disorders, or poor
training and preparation for the traumatic event.
Peri-traumatic or trauma-related factors: These may be severe trauma, type of trauma
(interpersonal traumas such as torture, rape or assault, convey a high risk of post-traumatic
stress disorder (PTSD)), high perceived threat to life, age at trauma (school age,
youth, 40 – 60 years of age), community (mass) trauma, or other peri-traumatic factors,
including: history of peri-traumatic dissociation and interpersonal trauma.
Post-traumatic factors: These may be the ongoing life stress, lack of social support,
bereavement, major loss of resources, or other post-traumatic factors including: children
at home and female with distressed spouse.[5
]
There are certain possible reactions to a traumatic situation, which are considered
within the ‘norm’ for individuals experiencing traumatic stress,[6] which are:
Psychological response to disaster
Psychological distress is defined as a serious and problematic emotional, cognitive,
physical or interpersonal reaction to difficulties. Distress is of sufficient intensity
to disrupt a person's normal life patterns. It can be distinguished from psychological
stress, which is considered as a more benign response to difficulties that an individual
is able to relieve through everyday coping responses. About 25% of people remain effective,
with emotional continence and appropriate behavior. Some 50 – 75% are ‘normal,’ but
bewildered, ‘numb,’ withdrawn, and anxious, and further, almost 15% are unaffected
by the outset, with inappropriate ‘contagious’ behavior.
The systematic study of 929 adult patients, examining the long-term psychiatric consequences,
work loss, and functional impairment associated with the 9/11-related loss among low-income,
minority primary care patients in New York City, found patients who had not experienced
9/11-related loss as compared to patients who experienced loss were roughly twice
as likely (OR = 1.97, 95%; CI = 1.40, 2.77) to screen positive for at least one mental
disorder, including major depressive disorder (MDD; 29.2%), generalized anxiety disorder
(GAD; 19.4%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; 17.1%). After controlling for
pre-9/11 trauma, the 9/11-related loss was significantly related to extreme pain interference,
work loss, and functional impairment. The results suggest that there is a need to
emphasize disaster-related mental health care in the affected population.[7] Psychological
effects of the disaster are as under:
Emotional Effects: Shock, terror, irritability, blame, anger, guilt, grief or sadness,
emotional, numbing, helplessness, loss of pleasure derived from familiar activities,
difficulty feeling happy, difficulty feeling loved.
Cognitive Effects: Impaired concentration, impaired decision-making ability, memory
impairment, disbelief, confusion, nightmares, decreased self-esteem, decreased self-efficacy,
self-blame, intrusive thoughts, memories, dissociation (e.g., tunnel vision, dreamlike
or ‘spacey’ feeling).
Physical Effects: Fatigue, exhaustion, insomnia, cardiovascular strain, startle response,
hyperarousal, increased physical pain, reduced immune response, headaches, gastrointestinal
upset, decreased appetite, decreased libido, vulnerability to illness.
Interpersonal Effects: Increased relational conflict, social withdrawal, reduced relational
intimacy, alienation, impaired work performance, decreased satisfaction, distrust,
externalization of blame, externalization of vulnerability, feeling abandoned.
PSYCHOSOCIAL RELIEF EFFORTS FOLLOWING A DISASTER
The first attempt is always to restore the health services. Mental health and psychosocial
support is not awarded high priority initially, but governments of the affected countries
soon realized that this too was a crying need of the people. It was recognized that
any neglect of psychosocial support could impair efforts toward physical rehabilitation.
Psychosocial support became crucial, but to be effective, the support had to be appropriate
and culturally sensitive. One of the important recommendations of the WHO was to have
a strong community mental health system, which would serve the immediate as well as
long-term needs of the community, provided it was sustainable and could become a part
of the routine health care delivery system. Different countries have developed innovative
methods of providing community mental health services. These efforts should be encouraged.
At the same time, the impact of these services should be objectively assessed and
changes made as necessary. The interventions immediately following a disaster occur
in four phases:
The rescue phase: This is the period immediately after the event and lasts about two
weeks. On an emotional scale, this is also referred to as the ‘Heroic Phase’. People,
victims and others alike, join hands to do whatever they can to prevent loss of life
and property in a spontaneous display of altruism. There are many accounts of people
who have been in the forefront of relief work, often working 48 to 72 hours at a stretch,
and have sometimes risked personal injury and suffering to help save lives of others.
However, there is a dark side to relief efforts too and care must be taken to ensure
that there is no looting, plundering or exploitation of the vulnerability of the victims.
The relief phase: This is a period lasting approximately two to six months after the
disaster. This is the period when a huge outpouring of relief supplies and support
from the community, voluntary agencies, and government result in a high level of optimism
about problems being dealt with and the situation improving. There is a wave of compassion,
goodwill, and care.
The rehabilitation phase: This period continues up to one to two years or more after
the disaster. Disillusionment about the efficacy of the relief efforts sets in at
some point in time during this phase. Bureaucratic delays and legal barriers in providing
relief and promises that are not kept or those that fall short of expectations can
lead to frustration. Victims realize that they have to give up the wait for help and
solve their own problems.
The rebuilding phase: This may last years and sometimes even continue for life. Disaster
preparedness, especially for high-risk and vulnerable areas, is also an integral part
of this phase. Individuals and communities work together to restore normalcy. People
begin to live life on their own terms and move on.
The impact of disaster is long lasting, however, psychosocial intervention in the
aftermath of a disaster is associated with a period of recovery .This can broadly
be defined as a time of returning to ‘normalcy,’ and characterized by such processes
as rebuilding, allocating resources, finding housing, and repairing or re-establishing
social and economic networks in the community.[8] It is noted that people may benefit
most from very concrete, explicit, and directive assistance, which enables them to
attain the tangible goods and services required to overcome the material losses of
a disaster.[9] Research has shown that the strains associated with restoring housing
and patterns of life can have as much an impact upon the psychological well-being
as acute and potentially traumatizing events.[10
]
CONCLUSION
Disasters have substantial social and psychological impacts, which reflect not only
the impact characteristics (e.g., magnitude and severity), but the pre-existing social
and economic vulnerabilities, which intensify the loss and disruption. Effective disaster
management, therefore, needs to ensure that the diverse interests and priorities of
communal life are integrated into planning and response, especially those of vulnerable
persons and groups. At the same time, it is important to take into consideration the
psychological effects of disasters, particularly in relation to response mechanisms
and processes. The level of psychological distress generated by a disaster may be
either diminished or intensified by planning and management decisions, which in turn
can enhance or impede recovery and reconstruction. The development of mental health
care faces special challenges in developing countries. There is a need for mental
health professionals to shift from a clinical to a public health focus; the development
of training materials, case records, information systems, and the availability of
adequate numbers of mental health professionals to implement the plan. There is a
need for training all those involved in disaster relief work. The importance of trained
Community Level Workers (CLWs) to implement an organized effort aimed at providing
psychosocial relief has been well exemplified. There is a need in the Indian scenario
to have community mental health teams trained for such events.