10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unanswered clinical questions: a survey of specialists and primary care providers*

      research-article
      , MSLS, MAT, AHIP , , MSLS, MS, AHIP, , MD, , PhD
      Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
      Medical Library Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          With the myriad of cases presented to clinicians every day at our integrated academic health system, clinical questions are bound to arise. Clinicians need to recognize these knowledge gaps and act on them. However, for many reasons, clinicians might not seek answers to these questions. Our goal was to investigate the rationale and process behind these unanswered clinical questions. Subsequently, we explored the use of biomedical information resources among specialists and primary care providers and identified ways to promote more informed clinical decision making.

          Methods

          We conducted a survey to assess how practitioners identify and respond to information gaps, their background knowledge of search tools and strategies, and their usage of and comfort level with technology.

          Results

          Most of the 292 respondents encountered clinical questions at least a few times per week. While the vast majority often or always pursued answers, time was the biggest barrier for not following through on questions. Most respondents did not have any formal training in searching databases, were unaware of many digital resources, and indicated a need for resources and services that could be provided at the point of care.

          Conclusions

          While the reasons for unanswered clinical questions varied, thoughtful review of the responses suggested that a combination of educational strategies, embedded librarian services, and technology applications could help providers pursue answers to their clinical questions, enhance patient safety, and contribute to patient-based, self-directed learning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System

          (2000)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.

            Based on 1984 data developed from reviews of medical records of patients treated in New York hospitals, the Institute of Medicine estimated that up to 98,000 Americans die each year from medical errors. The basis of this estimate is nearly 3 decades old; herein, an updated estimate is developed from modern studies published from 2008 to 2011. A literature review identified 4 limited studies that used primarily the Global Trigger Tool to flag specific evidence in medical records, such as medication stop orders or abnormal laboratory results, which point to an adverse event that may have harmed a patient. Ultimately, a physician must concur on the findings of an adverse event and then classify the severity of patient harm. Using a weighted average of the 4 studies, a lower limit of 210,000 deaths per year was associated with preventable harm in hospitals. Given limitations in the search capability of the Global Trigger Tool and the incompleteness of medical records on which the Tool depends, the true number of premature deaths associated with preventable harm to patients was estimated at more than 400,000 per year. Serious harm seems to be 10- to 20-fold more common than lethal harm. The epidemic of patient harm in hospitals must be taken more seriously if it is to be curtailed. Fully engaging patients and their advocates during hospital care, systematically seeking the patients' voice in identifying harms, transparent accountability for harm, and intentional correction of root causes of harm will be necessary to accomplish this goal.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Information needs in office practice: are they being met?

              We studied the self-reported information needs of 47 physicians during a half day of typical office practice. The physicians raised 269 questions about patient management. Questions related to all medical specialties and were highly specific to the individual patient's problem. Subspecialists most frequently asked questions related to other subspecialties. Only 30% of physicians' information needs were met during the patient visit, usually by another physician or other health professional. Reasons print sources were not used included the age of textbooks in the office, poor organization of journal articles, inadequate indexing of books and drug information sources, lack of knowledge of an appropriate source, and the time required to find the desired information. Better methods are needed to provide answers to questions that arise in office practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Libr Assoc
                J Med Libr Assoc
                mlab
                Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
                Medical Library Association (65 East Wacker Place, Suite 1900, Chicago, IL 60601-7246 )
                1536-5050
                1558-9439
                January 2017
                : 105
                : 1
                : 4-11
                Article
                jmla-105-4
                10.5195/jmla.2017.101
                5234458
                28096740
                c6014b3d-1a91-4669-8858-2e15c37a985c
                Copyright: © 2017, Authors.

                Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 01 March 2016
                : 01 July 2016
                Categories
                Surveys and Studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article