3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating reliability in wearable devices for sleep staging

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sleep is crucial for physical and mental health, but traditional sleep quality assessment methods have limitations. This scoping review analyzes 35 articles from the past decade, evaluating 62 wearable setups with varying sensors, algorithms, and features. Our analysis indicates a trend towards combining accelerometer and photoplethysmography (PPG) data for out-of-lab sleep staging. Devices using only accelerometer data are effective for sleep/wake detection but fall short in identifying multiple sleep stages, unlike those incorporating PPG signals. To enhance the reliability of sleep staging wearables, we propose five recommendations: (1) Algorithm validation with equity, diversity, and inclusion considerations, (2) Comparative performance analysis of commercial algorithms across multiple sleep stages, (3) Exploration of feature impacts on algorithm accuracy, (4) Consistent reporting of performance metrics for objective reliability assessment, and (5) Encouragement of open-source classifier and data availability. Implementing these recommendations can improve the accuracy and reliability of sleep staging algorithms in wearables, solidifying their value in research and clinical settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

          David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Automatic sleep/wake identification from wrist activity.

            The purpose of this study was to develop and validate automatic scoring methods to distinguish sleep from wakefulness based on wrist activity. Forty-one subjects (18 normals and 23 with sleep or psychiatric disorders) wore a wrist actigraph during overnight polysomnography. In a randomly selected subsample of 20 subjects, candidate sleep/wake prediction algorithms were iteratively optimized against standard sleep/wake scores. The optimal algorithms obtained for various data collection epoch lengths were then prospectively tested on the remaining 21 subjects. The final algorithms correctly distinguished sleep from wakefulness approximately 88% of the time. Actigraphic sleep percentage and sleep latency estimates correlated 0.82 and 0.90, respectively, with corresponding parameters scored from the polysomnogram (p < 0.0001). Automatic scoring of wrist activity provides valuable information about sleep and wakefulness that could be useful in both clinical and research applications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring sleep: accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of wrist actigraphy compared to polysomnography.

              We validated actigraphy for detecting sleep and wakefulness versus polysomnography (PSG). Actigraphy and polysomnography were simultaneously collected during sleep laboratory admissions. All studies involved 8.5 h time in bed, except for sleep restriction studies. Epochs (30-sec; n = 232,849) were characterized for sensitivity (actigraphy = sleep when PSG = sleep), specificity (actigraphy = wake when PSG = wake), and accuracy (total proportion correct); the amount of wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) was also assessed. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model included age, gender, insomnia diagnosis, and daytime/nighttime sleep timing factors. Controlled sleep laboratory conditions. Young and older adults, healthy or chronic primary insomniac (PI) patients, and daytime sleep of 23 night-workers (n = 77, age 35.0 ± 12.5, 30F, mean nights = 3.2). N/A. Overall, sensitivity (0.965) and accuracy (0.863) were high, whereas specificity (0.329) was low; each was only slightly modified by gender, insomnia, day/night sleep timing (magnitude of change 30 min/night. This validation quantifies strengths and weaknesses of actigraphy as a tool measuring sleep in clinical and population studies. Overall, the participant-specific accuracy is relatively high, and for most participants, above 80%. We validate this finding across multiple nights and a variety of adults across much of the young to midlife years, in both men and women, in those with and without insomnia, and in 77 participants. We conclude that actigraphy is overall a useful and valid means for estimating total sleep time and wakefulness after sleep onset in field and workplace studies, with some limitations in specificity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                moe.elgendi@hest.ethz.ch
                carlo.menon@hest.ethz.ch
                Journal
                NPJ Digit Med
                NPJ Digit Med
                NPJ Digital Medicine
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2398-6352
                18 March 2024
                18 March 2024
                2024
                : 7
                : 74
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biomedical and Mobile Health Technology Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, ( https://ror.org/05a28rw58) Zurich, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, ( https://ror.org/05a28rw58) Zurich, Switzerland
                [3 ]Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, ( https://ror.org/05a28rw58) Zurich, Switzerland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8205-8013
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1831-0202
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-7054
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-9977
                Article
                1016
                10.1038/s41746-024-01016-9
                10948771
                38499793
                c689b03b-a1f2-4530-87b5-8801b5ff059c
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 June 2023
                : 18 January 2024
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                biomarkers,public health,computer science,biomedical engineering

                Comments

                Comment on this article