3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Building the Positive Emotion-Resilience-Coping Efficacy Model for COVID-19 Pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The world faces unprecedented challenges because of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Existing theories of human flourishing and coping efficacy are too broad and general to address COVID-19 unprecedented mental health challenges. This study examined two main objectives, first the associations between psychological outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress) and psychological wellbeing of this phenomenon, and second, moderating and mediating factors emotions, resilience and coping self-efficacy. A nationwide survey was carried out on a Malaysian sample ( n = 920). Participants completed an on-line survey that assessed psychological outcomes, psychological wellbeing, positive–negative emotions, resilience, and coping self-efficacy. The relationship between psychological states and psychological wellbeing was successfully mediated by coping self-efficacy (direct effects of −0.31 to −0.46 at p < 0.01) and resilience (direct effects of −0.06 to −0.26 at p < 0.01). Moreover, positive emotion significantly moderated depression ( b = −0.02, p < 0.01) and anxiety ( b = −0.14, p = 0.05) with psychological wellbeing. Findings highlighted the importance of these factors in developing a dedicated model to be built into the recovery plan to ameliorate the negative impact of COVID-19 on psychological wellbeing. Hence, the Positive Emotion-Resilience-Coping Efficacy Model was developed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

          Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

            In recent studies of the structure of affect, positive and negative affect have consistently emerged as two dominant and relatively independent dimensions. A number of mood scales have been created to measure these factors; however, many existing measures are inadequate, showing low reliability or poor convergent or discriminant validity. To fill the need for reliable and valid Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales that are also brief and easy to administer, we developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month time period. Normative data and factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity for the scales are also presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                17 March 2022
                2022
                17 March 2022
                : 13
                : 764811
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Malaysia , Putrajaya, Malaysia
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Edinburgh Business School, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [4] 4National University of Malaysia , Bangi, Malaysia
                [5] 5Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of Applied Statistics, University Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [6] 6Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER) , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Xiaohui Wang, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

                Reviewed by: Zhi Lin, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Chien-liang Lin, Ningbo University, China; Vincent Hooper, Xiamen University, China; Tinggui Chen, Zhejiang Gongshang University, China

                *Correspondence: Guek Nee Ke, g.n.ke@ 123456hw.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2022.764811
                8969746
                35369195
                c6bf3a06-7ae6-4878-aacf-0798295e8585
                Copyright © 2022 Ke, Grajfoner, Wong, Carter, Khairudin, Lau, Kamal and Lee.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 August 2021
                : 17 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 9, Equations: 0, References: 80, Pages: 13, Words: 9317
                Funding
                Funded by: Scottish Funding Council , doi 10.13039/501100000360;
                Award ID: SFC: P20GCRF7.
                Funded by: Global Challenges Research Fund
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                covid-19,psychological wellbeing,positive emotion,resilience,coping self-efficacy,depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article