20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rehab on Wheels: A Pilot Study of Tablet-Based Wheelchair Training for Older Adults

      research-article
      , BMR(OT), BSW, MSc (Rehab) 1 , ,   , MSc, PhD 2 , 3 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 4
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
      JMIR Publications Inc.
      wheelchairs, telemedicine, self-efficacy, aged, pilot projects

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Alternative and innovative strategies such as mHealth and eLearning are becoming a necessity for delivery of rehabilitation services. For example, older adults who require a wheelchair receive little, if any, training for proficiency with mobility skills. This substantive service gap is due in part to restricted availability of clinicians and challenges for consumers to attend appointments. A research team of occupational therapists and computer scientists engaged clinicians, consumers, and care providers using a participatory action design approach. A tablet-based application, Enhancing Participation In the Community by improving Wheelchair Skills (EPIC Wheels), was developed to enable in-chair home training, online expert trainer monitoring, and trainee-trainer communication via secure voice messaging.

          Objective

          Prior to undertaking a randomized controlled trial (RCT), a pilot study was conducted to determine the acceptability and feasibility of administering an mHealth wheelchair skills training program safely and effectively with two participants of different skill levels. The findings were used to determine whether further enhancements to the program were indicated.

          Methods

          The program included two in-person sessions with an expert trainer and four weeks of independent home training. The EPIC Wheels application included video instruction and demonstration, self-paced training activities, and interactive training games. Participants were provided with a 10-inch Android tablet, mounting apparatus, and mobile Wi-Fi device. Frequency and duration of tablet interactions were monitored and uploaded daily to an online trainer interface. Participants completed a structured evaluation survey and provided feedback post-study. The trainer provided feedback on the training protocol and trainer interface.

          Results

          Both participants perceived the program to be comprehensive, useful, and easily navigated. The trainer indicated usage data was comprehensive and informative for monitoring participant progress and adherence. The application performed equally well with multiple devices. Some initial issues with log-in requests were resolved via tablet-specific settings. Inconsistent Internet connectivity, resulting in delayed data upload and voice messaging, was specific to individual Wi-Fi devices and resolved by standardizing configuration. Based on the pilot results, the software was updated to make content download more robust. Additional features were also incorporated such as check marks for completed content, a more consumer-friendly aesthetic, and achievement awards. The trainer web interface was updated to improve usability and provides both a numerical and visual summary of participant data.

          Conclusions

          The EPIC Wheels pilot study provided useful feedback on the feasibility of a tablet-based home program for wheelchair skills training among older adults, justifying advancement to evaluation in an RCT. The program may be expanded for use with other rehabilitation interventions and populations, particularly for those living in rural or remote locations. Future development will consider integration of built-in tablet sensors to provide performance feedback and enable interactive training activities.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01644292; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01644292 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6XyvYyTUf).

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Web-Based Interventions for Behavior Change and Self-Management: Potential, Pitfalls, and Progress

          The potential advantages of using the Internet to deliver self-care and behavior-change programs are well recognized. An aging population combined with the increasing prevalence of long-term conditions and more effective medical interventions place financial strain on all health care systems. Web-based interventions have the potential to combine the tailored approach of face-to-face interventions with the scalability of public health interventions that have low marginal costs per additional user. From a patient perspective, Web-based interventions can be highly attractive because they are convenient, easily accessible, and can maintain anonymity/privacy. Recognition of this potential has led to research in developing and evaluating Web-based interventions for self-management of long-term conditions and behavior change. Numerous systematic reviews have confirmed the effectiveness of some Web-based interventions, but a number of unanswered questions still remain. This paper reviews the progress made in developing and evaluating Web-based interventions and considers three challenging areas: equity, effectiveness, and implementation. The impact of Web-based interventions on health inequalities remains unclear. Although some have argued that such interventions can increase access to underserved communities, there is evidence to suggest that reliance on Web-based interventions may exacerbate health inequalities by excluding those on the “wrong” side of the digital divide. Although most systematic reviews have found a positive effect on outcomes of interest, effect sizes tend to be small and not all interventions are successful. Further work is needed to determine why some interventions work and others do not. This includes considering the “active ingredients” or mechanism of action of these complex interventions and the context in which they are used. Are there certain demographic, psychological, or clinical factors that promote or inhibit success? Are some behaviors or some clinical problems more amenable to change by computer-based interventions? Equally problematic is the issue of implementation and integration of such programs into routine clinical practice. Many eHealth projects end when the research is concluded and fail to become part of mainstream clinical care. One way of addressing these challenges is to apply the Medical Research Council framework for developing, evaluating, and implementing complex interventions. This includes having a strong theoretical foundation, developing a proposed mechanism or pathway of action, ensuring that the evaluation adequately reflects this proposed pathway, and considering implementation from the beginning of the development process.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            An Evaluation of Mobile Health Application Tools

            Background The rapid growth in the number of mobile health applications could have profound significance in the prevention of disease or in the treatment of patients with chronic disease such as diabetes. Objective The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of the most common mobile health care applications available in the Apple iTunes marketplace. Methods We undertook a descriptive analysis of a sample of applications in the “health and wellness” category of the Apple iTunes Store. We characterized each application in terms of its health factor and primary method of user engagement. The main outcome measures of the analysis were price, health factors, and methods of user engagement. Results Among the 400 applications that met the inclusion criteria, the mean price of the most frequently downloaded paid applications was US $2.24 (SD $1.30), and the mean price of the most currently available paid applications was US $2.27 (SD $1.60). Fitness/training applications were the most popular (43.5%, 174/400). The next two most common categories were health resource (15.0%, 60/400) and diet/caloric intake (14.3%, 57/400). Applications in the health resource category constituted 5.5% (22/400) of the applications reviewed. Self-monitoring was the most common primary user engagement method (74.8%, 299/400). A total of 20.8% (83/400) of the applications used two or more user engagement approaches, with self-monitoring and progress tracking being the most frequent. Conclusions Most of the popular mobile health applications focus on fitness and self-monitoring. The approaches to user engagement utilized by these applications are limited and present an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of the technology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
                JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
                JRAT
                JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
                JMIR Publications Inc. (Toronto, Canada )
                2369-2529
                Jan-Jun 2015
                30 April 2015
                : 2
                : 1
                : e3
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Department of Occupational Therapy University of Manitoba Winnipeg, MBCanada
                [2] 2Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Department of Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science University of British Columbia Vancouver, BCCanada
                [3] 3Department of Computer Science University of British Columbia Vancouver, BCCanada
                [4] 4Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Department of Physical Therapy University of British Columbia Vancouver, BCCanada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Edward Mark Giesbrecht ed.giesbrecht@ 123456umanitoba.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8011-3491
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-0210
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4810-5816
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7053-441X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-0788
                Article
                v2i1e3
                10.2196/rehab.4274
                5454553
                28582240
                c72bfd1a-3bb3-4230-a188-330c5b224be6
                ©Edward Mark Giesbrecht, William C. Miller, Boyang Tom Jin, Ian M. Mitchell, Janice J. Eng. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 30.04.2015.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 21 January 2015
                : 12 February 2015
                : 04 March 2015
                : 22 March 2015
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                wheelchairs,telemedicine,self-efficacy,aged,pilot projects
                wheelchairs, telemedicine, self-efficacy, aged, pilot projects

                Comments

                Comment on this article