40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevalence and effect of pre-treatment drug resistance on the virological response to antiretroviral treatment initiated in HIV-infected children – a EuroCoord-CHAIN-EPPICC joint project

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 17 , 1 , The EuroCoord-CHAIN-EPPICC joint project study group
      BMC Infectious Diseases
      BioMed Central
      HIV, Children, Pre-treatment drug resistance mutations, Virological failure, First-line combination antiretroviral therapy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Few studies have evaluated the impact of pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) on response to combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) in children. The objective of this joint EuroCoord-CHAIN-EPPICC/PENTA project was to assess the prevalence of PDR mutations and their association with virological outcome in the first year of cART in children.

          Methods

          HIV-infected children <18 years initiating cART between 1998 and 2008 were included if having at least one genotypic resistance test prior to cART initiation. We used the World Health Organization 2009 resistance mutation list and Stanford algorithm to infer resistance to prescribed drugs. Time to virological failure (VF) was defined as the first of two consecutive HIV-RNA > 500 copies/mL after 6 months cART and was assessed by Cox proportional hazards models. All models were adjusted for baseline demographic, clinical, immunology and virology characteristics and calendar period of cART start and initial cART regimen.

          Results

          Of 476 children, 88 % were vertically infected. At cART initiation, median (interquartile range) age was 6.6 years (2.1–10.1), CD4 cell count 297 cells/mm 3 (98–639), and HIV-RNA 5.2 log 10copies/mL (4.7–5.7). Of 37 children (7.8 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI), 5.5–10.6) harboring a virus with ≥1 PDR mutations, 30 children had a virus resistant to ≥1 of the prescribed drugs. Overall, the cumulative Kaplan-Meier estimate for virological failure was 19.8 % (95 %CI, 16.4–23.9). Cumulative risk for VF tended to be higher among children harboring a virus with PDR and resistant to ≥1 drug prescribed than among those receiving fully active cART: 32.1 % (17.2–54.8) versus 19.4 % (15.9–23.6) ( P = 0.095). In multivariable analysis, age was associated with a higher risk of VF with a 12 % reduced risk per additional year (HR 0.88; 95 %CI, 0.82–0.95; P < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          PDR was not significantly associated with a higher risk of VF in children in the first year of cART. The risk of VF decreased by 12 % per additional year at treatment initiation which may be due to fading of PDR mutations over time. Lack of appropriate formulations, in particular for the younger age group, may be an important determinant of virological failure.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1968-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          HIV-1 drug resistance in antiretroviral-naive individuals in sub-Saharan Africa after rollout of antiretroviral therapy: a multicentre observational study.

          There are few data on the epidemiology of primary HIV-1 drug resistance after the roll-out of antiretroviral treatment (ART) in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to assess the prevalence of primary resistance in six African countries after ART roll-out and if wider use of ART in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with rising prevalence of drug resistance. We did a cross-sectional study in antiretroviral-naive adults infected with HIV-1 who had not started first-line ART, recruited between 2007 and 2009 from 11 regions in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. We did population-based sequencing of the pol gene on plasma specimens with greater than 1000 copies per mL of HIV RNA. We identified drug-resistance mutations with the WHO list for transmitted resistance. The prevalence of sequences containing at least one drug-resistance mutation was calculated accounting for the sampling weights of the sites. We assessed the risk factors of resistance with multilevel logistic regression with random coefficients. 2436 (94.1%) of 2590 participants had a pretreatment genotypic resistance result. 1486 participants (57.4%) were women, 1575 (60.8%) had WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 disease, and the median CD4 count was 133 cells per μL (IQR 62-204). Overall sample-weighted drug-resistance prevalence was 5.6% (139 of 2436; 95% CI 4.6-6.7), ranging from 1.1% (two of 176; 0.0-2.7) in Pretoria, South Africa, to 12.3% (22 of 179; 7.5-17.1) in Kampala, Uganda. The pooled prevalence for all three Ugandan sites was 11.6% (66 of 570; 8.9-14.2), compared with 3.5% (73 of 1866; 2.5-4.5) for all other sites. Drug class-specific resistance prevalence was 2.5% (54 of 2436; 1.8-3.2) for nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 3.3% (83 of 2436; 2.5-4.2) for non-NRTIs (NNRTIs), 1.3% (31 of 2436; 0.8-1.8) for protease inhibitors, and 1.2% (25 of 2436; 0.7-1.7) for dual-class resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs. The most common drug-resistance mutations were K103N (43 [1.8%] of 2436), thymidine analogue mutations (33 [1.6%] of 2436), M184V (25 [1.2%] of 2436), and Y181C/I (19 [0.7%] of 2436). The odds ratio for drug resistance associated with each additional year since the start of the ART roll-out in a region was 1.38 (95% CI 1.13-1.68; p=0.001). The higher prevalence of primary drug resistance in Uganda than in other African countries is probably related to the earlier start of ART roll-out in Uganda. Resistance surveillance and prevention should be prioritised in settings where ART programmes are scaled up. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation.

            Interpreting the results of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genotypic drug-resistance tests is one of the most difficult tasks facing clinicians caring for HIV-1-infected patients. There are many drug-resistance mutations, and they arise in complex patterns that cause varying levels of drug resistance. In addition, HIV-1 exists in vivo as a virus population containing many genomic variants. Genotypic-resistance testing detects the drug-resistance mutations present in the most common plasma virus variants but may not detect drug-resistance mutations present in minor virus variants. Therefore, interpretation systems are necessary to determine the phenotypic and clinical significance of drug-resistance mutations found in a patient's plasma virus population. We describe the scientific principles of HIV-1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation and the most commonly used Web-based resources for clinicians ordering genotypic drug-resistance tests.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Drug Resistance Mutations for Surveillance of Transmitted HIV-1 Drug-Resistance: 2009 Update

              Programs that monitor local, national, and regional levels of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance inform treatment guidelines and provide feedback on the success of HIV-1 treatment and prevention programs. To accurately compare transmitted drug resistance rates across geographic regions and times, the World Health Organization has recommended the adoption of a consensus genotypic definition of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance. In January 2007, we outlined criteria for developing a list of mutations for drug-resistance surveillance and compiled a list of 80 RT and protease mutations meeting these criteria (surveillance drug resistance mutations; SDRMs). Since January 2007, several new drugs have been approved and several new drug-resistance mutations have been identified. In this paper, we follow the same procedures described previously to develop an updated list of SDRMs that are likely to be useful for ongoing and future studies of transmitted drug resistance. The updated SDRM list has 93 mutations including 34 NRTI-resistance mutations at 15 RT positions, 19 NNRTI-resistance mutations at 10 RT positions, and 40 PI-resistance mutations at 18 protease positions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ++66 5381 9125 , Nicole.Ngo-Giang-Huong@phpt.org
                Journal
                BMC Infect Dis
                BMC Infect. Dis
                BMC Infectious Diseases
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2334
                8 November 2016
                8 November 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 654
                Affiliations
                [1 ]IRD UMI 174 - PHPT-Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, 110, Intrawarorot Road, Sripoom, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200 Thailand
                [2 ]Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
                [3 ]Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED; INSERM, Centre INSERM U1219; CHU de Bordeaux, Pole de Sante Publique, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
                [4 ]Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
                [5 ]Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [6 ]Hôpital Saint-Pierre, Brussel, Belgium
                [7 ]“Dr. Victor Babes” Hospital for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Bucharest, Romania
                [8 ]Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [9 ]Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
                [10 ]University of Padua, Padua, Italy
                [11 ]“Dr. Victor Babes” Hospital for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Bucharest, Romania
                [12 ]University Hospital of Getafe, Madrid, Spain
                [13 ]Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [14 ]University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [15 ]Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
                [16 ]Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [17 ]University College London, London, UK
                [18 ]Hospital de Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain
                [19 ]Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [20 ]University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
                [21 ]AIDS Reference Center, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium
                [22 ]University College London, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
                [23 ]Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
                [24 ]Bordeaux RCC, INSERM, U897, Bordeaux, France
                [25 ]Copenhagen RCC, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8950-3234
                Article
                1968
                10.1186/s12879-016-1968-2
                5101717
                27825316
                c77fb14f-50ac-4d1b-8bab-8306123448c4
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 9 February 2016
                : 25 October 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: European Union Seventh Framework Programme
                Award ID: EuroCoord grant agreement 260694 and CHAIN under grant agreement 22313
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                hiv,children,pre-treatment drug resistance mutations,virological failure,first-line combination antiretroviral therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content184

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors787