8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Depression in the Elderly. Consensus Statement of the Spanish Psychogeriatric Association

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Present knowledge about depression in the elderly is still scarce and often controversial, despite its high frequency and impact. This article reports the results and most relevant conclusions of a Delphi-based consensus on geriatric depression promoted by the Spanish Psychogeriatric Association.

          Methods

          A 78-item questionnaire was developed by 7 highly specialized geriatric psychiatrists and was evaluated using the Modified Delphi technique in two rounds answered by 35 psychiatrists with an extensive expertise in geriatric depression. The topics and number of questions (in brackets) covered were: concepts, clinical aspects, and risk factors (12); screening and diagnosis (7); psychotic depression (17); depression and dementia (5); antidepressant drug treatment (18); non-pharmacological biological treatments (5); psychotherapeutic treatments (4); comorbidity and preventive aspects (6); professional training needed (4). In addition, the expert panel’s opinion on the antidepressants of choice in 21 common comorbid conditions and on different strategies to approach treatment-resistant cases in terms of both efficacy and safety was assessed.

          Results

          After the two rounds of the Delphi process, consensus was reached for 59 (75.6%) of the 78 items. Detailed recommendations are included in the text. Considering pharmacological treatments, agomelatine was the most widely mentioned drug to be recommended in terms of safety in comorbid conditions. Desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine, were the most frequently recommended antidepressants in comorbid conditions in general. Combining parameters of efficacy and safety, experts recommended the following steps to address cases of treatment resistance: 1. Escalation to the maximum tolerated dose; 2. Change of antidepressant; 3. Combination with another antidepressant; 4. Potentiation with an antipsychotic or with lamotrigine; 5. Potentiation with lithium; 6. Potentiation with dopamine agonists or methylphenidate

          Discussion and Conclusions

          Consensus was reached for a high number of items as well as for the management of depression in the context of comorbid conditions and in resistant cases. In the current absence of sufficient evidence-based information, our results can be used to inform medical doctors about clinical recommendations that might reduce uncertainty in the diagnosis and treatment of elderly patients with depressive disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Management of Depression in Older Adults: A Review.

          Depression in older adults is a common psychiatric disorder affecting their health-related quality of life. Major depression occurs in 2% of adults aged 55 years or older, and its prevalence rises with increasing age. In addition, 10% to 15% of older adults have clinically significant depressive symptoms, even in the absence of major depression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neuropsychiatric predictors of progression from amnestic-mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: the role of depression and apathy.

            The aim of the study is to evaluate whether depression or apathy in patients with amnestic-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) increases the risk of progressing to Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigated 131 consecutive memory-clinic outpatients with newly-diagnosed amnestic-MCI (mean age 70.8, SD=6.5). Psychiatric disorders were diagnosed at baseline according to the criteria for depression and apathy in AD. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Follow-up examinations were conducted after six months and annually for four years. Neurologists diagnosed AD at follow-up using NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Cox proportional hazard models with 95% confidence intervals were used to test the hypothesis that apathy or depression increases the risk of developing AD. At baseline, 36.6% amnestic-MCI patients had a diagnosis of depression and 10.7% had apathy. Patients with both amnestic-MCI and an apathy diagnosis had an almost sevenfold risk of AD progression compared to amnestic-MCI patients without apathy (HR=6.9; 2.3-20.6), after adjustment for age, gender, education, baseline global cognitive and functional status, and depression. Furthermore, the risk of developing AD increased 30% per point on the NPI apathy item (HR=1.3; 1.1-1.4). There was no increased risk of developing AD in amnestic-MCI patients with either a diagnosis or symptoms of depression. In conclusion, apathy, but not depression, predicts which patients with amnestic-MCI will progress to AD. Thus, apathy has an important impact on amnestic-MCI and should be considered a mixed cognitive/psychiatric disturbance related to ongoing AD neurodegeneration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical practice. Depression in the elderly.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/698100
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/777481
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                20 May 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 380
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Servicio de Psiquiatría, Instituto de Investigación i+12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre , Madrid, Spain
                [2] 2Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM) , Madrid, Spain
                [3] 3Madrid Salud, Ayuntamiento de Madrid , Madrid, Spain
                [4] 4Psychiatry Department, University of Sevilla , Seville, Spain
                [5] 5FIDMAG Research Foundation (CIBERSAM) , Barcelona, Spain
                [6] 6Instituto de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC) , Madrid, Spain
                [7] 7Unidad de Psiquiatría Geriátrica, Hospital Sagrat Cor. Martorell , Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Francesca Assogna, Santa Lucia Foundation (IRCCS), Italy

                Reviewed by: Nerisa Banaj, Santa Lucia Foundation (IRCCS), Italy; Luca Cravello, ASST Rhodense, Italy

                *Correspondence: Luis Agüera-Ortiz, laguera@ 123456med.ucm.es

                This article was submitted to Aging Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00380
                7251154
                32508684
                c83a7c59-7b30-443f-9211-819fb74afe24
                Copyright © 2020 Agüera-Ortiz, Claver-Martín, Franco-Fernández, López-Álvarez, Martín-Carrasco, Ramos-García and Sánchez-Pérez

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 January 2020
                : 16 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 13, Equations: 0, References: 116, Pages: 21, Words: 11396
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                depression,elderly,consensus statement,clinical recommendations,antidepressant drugs,treatment-resistance,comorbidity

                Comments

                Comment on this article