4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PARTICIPANTS’ PERSPECTIVES ON RECEIVING RESULTS USING FOUND POETRY: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY

      abstract
      , ,
      Innovation in Aging
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Few researchers share study results with participants, often citing a lack of knowledge regarding how to do so. This study explored the dissemination preferences of study participants receiving results in the form of found poetry, developed from dyadic interviews with sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM couples’ regarding their experiences with cancer. Participants (N=24) completed demographic and health questionnaires, a pre-posttraumatic growth-inventory-expanded (PTGI-X), and were randomized to receive the found poem as text, text and audio, audio, or video formats. Participants completed a post-PTGI-X, reported dissemination preferences, and emotions experienced. Open-ended responses demonstrated that using found poetry to disseminate results communicated that participant experiences were understood, fostered introspection, and renewed appreciation for their partner. Only SGM participants (n=3) reported preferring a format other than the one to which they were randomized. The text-only and combined text and audio formats evoked the greatest number of emotions (n=13 each) followed by video (n=4), and audio-only (n=3). Across randomization groups, interest (n=11) was most frequently reported, followed by sadness (n=8), and joy (n=6). Quantitatively, there were no significant changes in participants’ PTG—a small sample size may have reduced statistical power—which might be seen as a failure. However, the open-ended responses indicate that innovative approaches to dissemination are acceptable and multiple options may increase accessibility. Only SGM participants preferred an alternate format, potentially reflecting a natural inclination to question the status quo. Including minority perspectives (positive/negative) illuminates the need to offer study participants choices in how and when they receive findings.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Innov Aging
          Innov Aging
          innovateage
          Innovation in Aging
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2399-5300
          December 2023
          21 December 2023
          21 December 2023
          : 7
          : Suppl 1 , Program Abstracts from The GSA 2023 Annual Scientific Meeting, “Building Bridges > Catalyzing Research > Empowering All Ages”
          : 79-80
          Affiliations
          University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
          University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
          University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
          Article
          igad104.0256
          10.1093/geroni/igad104.0256
          10735572
          c863c76f-8114-4248-a7a8-c284bf624dde
          © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Session 1250 (Symposium)
          AcademicSubjects/SOC02600

          Comments

          Comment on this article