12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phase III study of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus best supportive care (BSC) for second-line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): KEYNOTE-240 Asian subgroup.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          526

          Background: Pembro received accelerated approval for second-line therapy in aHCC based on KEYNOTE-224 (phase 2). KEYNOTE-240 (NCT02702401) is a randomized, phase 3 study of pembro v BSC in previously treated aHCC. We report outcomes for the Asian subgroup. Methods: Pts with a radiographic/pathologic HCC diagnosis, radiographic progression with/intolerance to sorafenib, Child-Pugh A disease, and ECOG PS 0/1 were randomized 2:1 to pembro (200 mg) + BSC or PBO + BSC Q3W (≤35 cycles or until confirmed PD/unacceptable toxicity). Pts were stratified by geographic region (Asia without Japan; non-Asia with Japan), AFP, and macrovascular invasion. Response was assessed Q6W (RECIST v1.1, central review). Primary end points: OS, PFS; secondary end points: ORR, DOR, safety. Data cutoff: Jan 2, 2019. Results: 413 pts were randomized (overall cohort: n = 278 pembro, n = 135 PBO; Asian subgroup [Hong Kong, Japan, Philippines, S Korea, Taiwan, Thailand]: n = 107, n = 50). HBV+ status and BCLC stage C were higher in Asian subgroup (HBV+: 51% v 24.5% overall; stage C: 86.6% v 79.4%). Median follow-up: pembro (21.3 mo overall; 23.5 mo); PBO (21.5 mo overall; 23.0 mo). Pembro improved OS v PBO (median OS [95% CI]: 13.9 [11.6-16.0] v 10.6 [8.3-13.5] mo; HR: 0.781; 95% CI, 0.611-0.998; P = 0.0238) and PFS (HR: 0.718; 0.570-0.904; P = 0.0022) for overall cohort and Asian subgroup (median OS: 13.8 [10.1-16.9] v 8.3 [6.3-11.8] mo; HR: 0.548; 0.374-0.804; P = 0.0009; PFS: HR: 0.475; 0.324-0.696; P < 0.0001). Differences did not meet prespecified significance level for overall cohort. ORR in overall cohort was 18.3% (14.0-23.4) for pembro; 4.4% (1.6-9.4; P = 0.00007) for PBO; in Asian subgroup, 20.6% (13.4-29.5) and 2.0% (0.1-10.6; P = 0.00135). Safety was consistent with that previously reported in pembro studies. No HBV/HCV flares were identified. Conclusions: Pembro reduced risk for death by 22% in overall cohort and 45% in Asian subgroup and improved PFS v PBO. Safety was comparable to that of pembro monotherapy. Results are consistent with KEYNOTE-224 and magnitude of OS benefit was enhanced in Asian subgroup, supporting a favorable risk-benefit balance for second-line pembro in HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02702401.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          February 01 2020
          February 01 2020
          : 38
          : 4_suppl
          : 526
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Kindai University, Osaka, Japan;
          [2 ]Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;
          [3 ]National Taiwan University Hospital Cancer Center, Taipei City, Taiwan;
          [4 ]Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan;
          [5 ]University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China;
          [6 ]Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan;
          [7 ]Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
          [8 ]Jichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan;
          [9 ]Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan;
          [10 ]Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan;
          [11 ]Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea;
          [12 ]Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ;
          [13 ]Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2020.38.4_suppl.526
          c8810fb2-d2db-439c-a4f1-295eb5fda9d4
          © 2020
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article