Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contradicciones en salud: sobre acumulación y legitimidad en los gobiernos neoliberales y sociales de derecho en América Latina Translated title: Contradictions in health: on acumulation and legitimation in Latin American neoliberal and social states

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          El texto utiliza el enfoque de la contradicción entre la acumulación capitalista y la legitimación del orden social para examinar los sistemas de salud de América Latina. Analiza, por un lado, los nuevos campos y estrategias de acumulación en salud en la globalización neoliberal y, por el otro, la recuperación del campo de salud por los gobiernos progresistas como ámbito público y garantía universal del derecho de la salud. Observa cómo la garantía de este derecho lo ha convertido en un campo de lucha política donde se enfrentan los agentes económicos privados y los gobiernos progresista y cómo la ofensiva ideológica neoliberal ha apropiado el discurso progresista pero cambiando en su contenido.

          Translated abstract

          This text uses the perspective of the contradiction between capital accumulation and legitimation of the social order to examine Latin American health systems. Analyzes, on one hand, the new areas and strategies of accumulation in health under neoliberal globalization and, on the other, the recovery of health as a public domain to assure the universal right to health by progressive governments. It observes how the guarantee of this right has turned it into a field of political struggle where private economic agents and progressive governments clash and how the neoliberal offensive has appropriated ideologically the progressive discourse but changing its content.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.

          To investigate whether funding of drug studies by the pharmaceutical industry is associated with outcomes that are favourable to the funder and whether the methods of trials funded by pharmaceutical companies differ from the methods in trials with other sources of support. Medline (January 1966 to December 2002) and Embase (January 1980 to December 2002) searches were supplemented with material identified in the references and in the authors' personal files. Data were independently abstracted by three of the authors and disagreements were resolved by consensus. 30 studies were included. Research funded by drug companies was less likely to be published than research funded by other sources. Studies sponsored by pharmaceutical companies were more likely to have outcomes favouring the sponsor than were studies with other sponsors (odds ratio 4.05; 95% confidence interval 2.98 to 5.51; 18 comparisons). None of the 13 studies that analysed methods reported that studies funded by industry was of poorer quality. Systematic bias favours products which are made by the company funding the research. Explanations include the selection of an inappropriate comparator to the product being investigated and publication bias.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            World health statistics

            (2007)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: a qualitative systematic review.

              This article systematically reviews published studies of the association of pharmaceutical industry funding and clinical trial results, as well a few closely related studies. It reviews two earlier results, and surveys the recent literature. Results are clear: Pharmaceutical company sponsorship is strongly associated with results that favor the sponsors' interests.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Journal
                sdeb
                Saúde em Debate
                Saúde debate
                Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saúde (Rio de Janeiro )
                2358-2898
                December 2014
                : 38
                : 103
                : 853-871
                Affiliations
                [1 ]
                Article
                S0103-11042014000400853
                10.5935/0103-1104.20140088
                c892cd40-6f03-43a4-a5c3-a799b3c55ad7

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0103-1104&lng=en
                Categories
                HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
                HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

                Health & Social care,Public health
                Política de salud,Sistemas de salud,América Latina,Right to health,Health policy,Health systems,Latin America,Derecho a la salud

                Comments

                Comment on this article