0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Present‐Day Upper‐Mantle Architecture of the Alps: Insights From Data‐Driven Dynamic Modeling

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The dynamics of the Alps and surrounding regions is still not completely understood, partly because of a non‐unique interpretation of its upper‐mantle architecture. In particular, it is unclear if interpreted slabs are consistent with the observed surface deformation and topography. We derive three end‐member scenarios of lithospheric thickness and slab geometries by clustering available shear‐wave tomography models into a statistical ensemble. We use these scenarios as input for geodynamic simulations and compare modeled topography, surface velocities and mantle flow to observations. We found that a slab detached beneath the Alps, but attached beneath the Northern Apennines captures first‐order patterns in topography and vertical surface velocities and can provide a causative explanation for the observed seismicity.

          Plain Language Summary

          Present‐day surface deformation, including earthquakes, plate motion, and mass (re)distribution, results from processes operating at the surface and in the interior of the Earth. Understanding these processes and their coupling is of utmost importance in light of the hazard they pose to society. The Alps provide an excellent natural laboratory to understand such coupling. Here, we use seismic tomography models to constrain its upper‐mantle architecture. We further use these models to quantify forces originating from the resolved architecture and their effects on the present‐day surface deformation. The models can reproduce first‐order patterns in the observed topography and vertical surface motions. We found a causative correlation between the presence of a shallow slab attached to the overlying lithosphere in the Northern Apennines and the seismicity in the region. Our results allow us to better understand the transfer of internal forces to the surface, thereby helping to quantify the present‐day mechanical setup of the area.

          Key Points

          • Statistical ensemble of S‐wave tomography models is used to infer the Lithosphere‐Asthenosphere Boundary configuration and slab geometries in the Alps

          • The 3‐D upper‐mantle architecture from the statistics reproduce first‐order patterns in observed topography and Global Navigation Satellite Systems vertical velocities

          • A shallow/attached slab in the Northern Apennines is consistent with the mantle depth seismicity observed in this region

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Geophysical Research Letters
                Geophysical Research Letters
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                0094-8276
                1944-8007
                September 28 2022
                September 19 2022
                September 28 2022
                : 49
                : 18
                Affiliations
                [1 ] GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam Germany
                [2 ] Faculty of Georesources and Materials Engineering RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany
                [3 ] Institute of Geosciences Christian‐Albrechts‐University of Kiel Kiel Germany
                [4 ] Institute of Geosciences Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Mainz Germany
                Article
                10.1029/2022GL099476
                c8ee550a-fe39-4ec2-86f9-b071eeb3b5cc
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article