8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Proofs of valid categorical syllogisms in one diagrammatic and two symbolic axiomatic systems

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gottfried Leibniz embarked on a research program to prove all the Aristotelic categorical syllogisms by diagrammatic and algebraic methods. He succeeded in proving them by means of Euler diagrams, but didn't produce a manuscript with their algebraic proofs. We demonstrate how key excerpts scattered across various Leibniz's drafts on logic contained sufficient ingredients to prove them by an algebraic method -- which we call the Leibniz-Cayley (LC) system -- without having to make use of the more expressive and complex machinery of first-order quantificational logic. In addition, we prove the classic categorical syllogisms again by a relational method -- which we call the McColl-Ladd (ML) system -- employing categorical relations studied by Hugh McColl and Christine Ladd. Finally, we show the connection of ML and LC with Boolean algebra, proving that ML is a consequence of LC, and that LC is a consequence of the Boolean lattice axioms, thus establishing Leibniz's historical priority over George Boole in characterizing and applying (a sufficient fragment of) Boolean algebra to effectively tackle categorical syllogistic.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          17 August 2023
          Article
          2308.12973
          c91c82dc-0ebb-4e5b-b3f2-85f4c2e02318

          http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          03-02, 03-03, 03-01, 03G05, 01-02, 01A45, 01A55, 97E30
          66 pages, 9 figures (some of which include subfigures), 5 tables (one of which includes 2 subtables). A cut-down version of this article, which removes the discussion on diagrammatic logic with Euler diagrams, was submitted to the "History and Philosophy of Logic" journal with a different title
          cs.LO math.HO

          Theoretical computer science,History & Philosophy
          Theoretical computer science, History & Philosophy

          Comments

          Comment on this article