4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Erratum to “Comparison of Repeated Fluid-Air Exchange and Passive Drainage for Removing Residual Emulsified Silicone Oil Droplets”

      correction
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , , 4 , , 1 , 2 , 3
      Journal of Ophthalmology
      Hindawi

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the article titled “Comparison of Repeated Fluid-Air Exchange and Passive Drainage for Removing Residual Emulsified Silicone Oil Droplets” [1], there was an error in correspondence line. The correspondence line “Correspondence should be addressed to Chunhui Jiang; chhjiang70@163.com” is incorrect. The correct correspondence line should be “Correspondence should be addressed to Chunhui Jiang; chhjiang70@163.com and Ye Tan; tan.ye@live.cn.” This mistake was introduced during the production process, and Hindawi apologises for causing this error in the article.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Comparison of Repeated Fluid-Air Exchange and Passive Drainage for Removing Residual Emulsified Silicone Oil Droplets

          Purpose To compare the efficacy of passive drainage (PD) and repeated fluid-air (FA) exchange for removing emulsified silicone oil (SO) droplets. Methods Twenty rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients who underwent primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with SO tamponade were randomly and evenly divided into two groups for PD and FA exchange. Once the bulk of SO was removed, the first 2 mL of the washout fluid was collected, and then, another 2 mL of the washout fluid was collected after PD or FA exchange. The size and number of SO droplets in the washout fluid were measured using a Coulter counter (Multisizer 3, Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The efficiencies of FA exchange and PD for removing emulsified SO were compared. Results The number of SO droplets decreased significantly after FA exchange and PD. The decrease in the number of droplets was statistically significant for larger droplets (>4 µm) with PD and for all droplet sizes with FA exchange. The decrease in the number of SO droplets of <4 μm was significantly greater with FA exchange than with PD. However, at the end of the procedure, the overall number and size distribution of SO droplets were similar for both procedures. Conclusions PD and FA exchange reduced the number of residual emulsified SO droplets after SO tamponade efficiently. FA exchange may have some advantages over PD in removing small droplets.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            J Ophthalmol
            J Ophthalmol
            JOPH
            Journal of Ophthalmology
            Hindawi
            2090-004X
            2090-0058
            2020
            2 November 2020
            2 November 2020
            : 2020
            : 6495075
            Affiliations
            1Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China
            2Key Laboratory of Myopia of State Health Ministry and Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration of Shanghai, Shanghai 200031, China
            3NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
            4Gongli Hospital of Shanghai Pudong New Area, Shanghai 200135, China
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-9345
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-990X
            https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-9292
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-9202
            https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-950X
            Article
            10.1155/2020/6495075
            7669326
            ca6ea2f9-fd3f-4193-af54-4dc2f6c23661
            Copyright © 2020 Jian Yu et al.

            This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

            History
            : 22 October 2020
            : 22 October 2020
            Categories
            Erratum

            Ophthalmology & Optometry
            Ophthalmology & Optometry

            Comments

            Comment on this article