Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antinuclear antibodies and their detection methods in diagnosis of connective tissue diseases: a journey revisited

      review-article
      1 , , 2 , 3
      Diagnostic Pathology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It has been more than 50 years since antinuclear antibodies were first discovered and found to be associated with connective tissue diseases. Since then different methods have been described and used for their detection or confirmation. For many decades immunofluorescent antinuclear antibody test has been the "gold standard" in the diagnosis of these disorders. However to increase the sensitivity and specificity of antinuclear antibody detection further approaches were explored. Today a battery of newer techniques are available some of which are now considered better and are competing with the older methods. This article provides an overview on advancement in antinuclear antibody detection methods, their future prospects, advantages, disadvantages and guidelines for use of these tests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Antinuclear antibodies: diagnostic markers for autoimmune diseases and probes for cell biology.

          E Tan (1988)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines for the laboratory use of autoantibody tests in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

            The Italian Society of Laboratory Medicine Study Group on the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Diseases has generated a series of guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases intendedfor the use of clinical pathologists and laboratory physicians. These guidelines are based on a systematic review of published works and expert panel discussion and consist of 13 recommendations for antinuclear antibodies, anti-double-stranded native DNA, and antinuclear specific antibodies. To improve analytic performances and help select the most appropriate test for specific autoantibodies, as well as provide education and guidance in the use of these tests, special emphasis is placed on laboratory methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. American College of Pathologists.

              The following guideline presents a series of recommendations based on published medical literature for use of the antinuclear antibody (ANA) test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens in the diagnostic evaluation, prognostic assessment, and monitoring of patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. The guideline emphasizes the need for clinical evaluation to improve the usefulness of test results in patient management. Consideration is given to appropriate use of the generic ANA test in the initial evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of a systemic rheumatic disease, the evaluation of patients suspected of having lupus erythematosus, use in clinical situations in which the ANA test is required to establish a disease diagnosis, and identification of clinical situations in which the ANA test has little value. Sections are also devoted to recommendations aimed at improving the analytic methods used to detect and measure ANA and specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens and to the appropriate use of tests for specific autoantibodies in several disease situations that commonly occur in patients with suspected or documented systemic rheumatic diseases. Emphasis is placed on the use of these tests only in situations in which the test results can be expected to provide information necessary for clinical decision making. Those tests of limited medical usefulness and situations in which test results are likely to be misleading are also identified.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diagn Pathol
                Diagnostic Pathology
                BioMed Central
                1746-1596
                2009
                2 January 2009
                : 4
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Grecian Superspeciality, Heart, Cancer and Multispeciality Hospital, Sector 69, Mohali, India
                [2 ]Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, Post Graduate Institute of Medial Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
                [3 ]Department of Immunopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medial Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
                Article
                1746-1596-4-1
                10.1186/1746-1596-4-1
                2628865
                19121207
                cb2424cb-75c5-43aa-9af3-f3496dd57ce3
                Copyright © 2009 Kumar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 October 2008
                : 2 January 2009
                Categories
                Review

                Pathology
                Pathology

                Comments

                Comment on this article