0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of follicular ablation and gonadotropin priming on the recovery and quality of oocytes in Boran cows

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality.

          The ability of a bovine embryo to develop to the blastocyst stage, to implant and to generate a healthy offspring is not a simple process. To clarify the importance of the contribution of the oocyte to the embryo quality, it is important to define more precisely the different types of competence expressed by oocytes. The ability to resume meiosis, to cleave upon fertilization to develop into a blastocyst, to induce pregnancy and to generate an healthy offspring are all separate events and succeeding in the first events does not ensure the success of subsequent ones. Furthermore, these events are associated with the three types of maturation processes observed in the oocyte: meiotic, cytoplasmic and molecular. These abilities vary also upon the type of follicle the oocytes is removed from. Larger or slow-growing follicles have been shown to foster better eggs than small or actively growing follicles. Hormonal stimulation can also affect oocyte competence with the nature of the effect (positive or negative) depending on timing and dose. This complex situation requires better definition of the contribution of each factor affecting the oocyte competence and the resulting embryo quality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impaired reproduction in heat-stressed cattle: basic and applied aspects.

            Summer heat stress (HS) is a major contributing factor in low fertility in lactating dairy cows in hot environments. Although modern cooling systems are used in dairy farms, fertility remains low. This review summarizes the ways in which the functioning of various parts of the reproductive system of cows exposed to HS is impaired. The dominance of the large follicle is suppressed during HS, and the steroidogenic capacity of theca and granulosa cells is compromised. Progesterone secretion by luteal cells is lowered during summer, and in cows subjected to chronic HS, this is also reflected in lower plasma progesterone concentration. HS has been reported to lower plasma concentration of LH and to increase that of FSH; the latter was associated with a drastic reduction in plasma concentration of inhibin. HS impairs oocyte quality and embryo development, and increases embryo mortality. High temperatures compromise endometrial function and alter its secretory activity, which may lead to termination of pregnancy. In addition to the immediate effects, delayed effects of HS have been detected as well. Among them, altered follicular dynamics, suppressed production of follicular steroids, and low quality of oocytes and developed embryos. These may explain the low fertility of cattle during the cool autumn months. Hormonal treatments improve low summer fertility to some extent but not sufficiently for it to equal winter fertility. A limiting factor is the inability of the high-yielding dairy cow to maintain normothermia. A hormonal manipulation protocol, which induces timed insemination, has been found to improve pregnancy rate and to reduce the number of days open during the summer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of follicle size on bovine oocyte quality and developmental competence following maturation, fertilization, and culture in vitro.

              The aim of the present series of experiments was to investigate the effect of the size of follicle from which the oocytes originate on their subsequent in vitro developmental ability. Ovarian follicles were isolated and grouped according to size (2-6 mm, > 6 mm). Primary oocytes were carefully liberated and grouped according to morphology into one of five categories: denuded; expanded; with two or three layers of cumulus; with four or five layers; and with many (six or more) layers. Following in vitro maturation (IVM), fertilization (IVF), and culture (IVC), more oocytes with many layers of cumulus (P 6 mm compared to 2-6 mm follicles (P 6 mm follicles vs. 34.3%, 34/99 from 2-6 mm follicles, respectively). Use of follicular fluid (BFF) from follicles of different sizes in the IVM medium did not significantly increase the cleavage rate or blastocyst yield compared to controls. Administration of porcine follicle-stimulating hormone (pFSH) to donors prior to slaughter was investigated as a possible means of increasing the number of larger sized follicles in the ovaries and, thereby, the quality of the recovered oocytes. It was found that administration of six injections of pFSH beginning 3 days prior to slaughter resulted in a significant increase (P 6 mm in diameter (31.6%) compared to that in nontreated controls (6.6%) and to animals that received only four injection groups (9.4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Tropical Animal Health and Production
                Trop Anim Health Prod
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0049-4747
                1573-7438
                October 2022
                September 08 2022
                October 2022
                : 54
                : 5
                Article
                10.1007/s11250-022-03302-8
                cb3299fd-418a-40ce-9cfd-d00e8b685b80
                © 2022

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article