9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Estimating HIV incidence in the Akwa Ibom AIDS indicator survey (AKAIS), Nigeria using the limiting antigen avidity recency assay

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          HIV incidence estimates are important to characterize the status of an epidemic, identify locations and populations at high risk and to guide and evaluate HIV prevention interventions. We used the limiting antigen avidity assay (LAg) as part of a recent infection testing algorithm to estimate HIV incidence in the Akwa Ibom AIDS Indicator Survey (AKAIS), Nigeria.

          Methods

          In 2017, AKAIS, a cross‐sectional population‐based study was conducted at the household (HH) level in 31 local government areas (LGAs) of Akwa Ibom state. Of the 8963 participants aged ≥15 years who were administered questionnaires for demographic and behavioural data, 8306 consented to HIV rapid testing. Whole‐blood specimens were collected from 394 preliminary HIV‐seropositive individuals for CD4+ cell count determination and plasma storage. Samples were shipped to a central quality laboratory for HIV confirmatory testing and viral load determination. A total of 370 HIV‐positive specimens were tested for the recent HIV infection using the LAg assay.

          Results

          Of the 8306 consenting adults, the HIV prevalence was 4.8%. Of the 370 HIV‐positive samples tested for HIV recency, the median age was 35 years, 48.8% had CD4+ cell count >500/mm 3 and 81.3% was not virally suppressed. Viral suppression was greater among females (21%) than for males (13%). A total of 11 specimens were classified as recent based on the LAg assay and HIV viral load ≥1000 copies/mL. The weighted, adjusted HIV‐1 incidence was 0.41/100 person‐years (95% CI 0.16 to 0.66); translating to 13,000 new cases of HIV infections annually in Akwa Ibom, a state with a population of 5.5 million. The HIV incidence rate was similar in females and males (0.41% and 0.42% respectively). The incidence rate was the highest among participants aged 15 to 49 years (0.44%, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.74) translating to 11,000 new infections annually, about 85% of all new infections in the state.

          Conclusions

          The finding of the high HIV incidence among the 15 to 49‐year age group calls for renewed and innovative efforts to prevent HIV infection among young adults in Akwa Ibom state.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Beyond detuning: 10 years of progress and new challenges in the development and application of assays for HIV incidence estimation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Recalibration of the Limiting Antigen Avidity EIA to Determine Mean Duration of Recent Infection in Divergent HIV-1 Subtypes

            Background Mean duration of recent infection (MDRI) and misclassification of long-term HIV-1 infections, as proportion false recent (PFR), are critical parameters for laboratory-based assays for estimating HIV-1 incidence. Recent review of the data by us and others indicated that MDRI of LAg-Avidity EIA estimated previously required recalibration. We present here results of recalibration efforts using >250 seroconversion panels and multiple statistical methods to ensure accuracy and consensus. Methods A total of 2737 longitudinal specimens collected from 259 seroconverting individuals infected with diverse HIV-1 subtypes were tested with the LAg-Avidity EIA as previously described. Data were analyzed for determination of MDRI at ODn cutoffs of 1.0 to 2.0 using 7 statistical approaches and sub-analyzed by HIV-1 subtypes. In addition, 3740 specimens from individuals with infection >1 year, including 488 from patients with AIDS, were tested for PFR at varying cutoffs. Results Using different statistical methods, MDRI values ranged from 88–94 days at cutoff ODn = 1.0 to 177–183 days at ODn = 2.0. The MDRI values were similar by different methods suggesting coherence of different approaches. Testing for misclassification among long-term infections indicated that overall PFRs were 0.6% to 2.5% at increasing cutoffs of 1.0 to 2.0, respectively. Balancing the need for a longer MDRI and smaller PFR (<2.0%) suggests that a cutoff ODn = 1.5, corresponding to an MDRI of 130 days should be used for cross-sectional application. The MDRI varied among subtypes from 109 days (subtype A&D) to 152 days (subtype C). Conclusions Based on the new data and revised analysis, we recommend an ODn cutoff = 1.5 to classify recent and long-term infections, corresponding to an MDRI of 130 days (118–142). Determination of revised parameters for estimation of HIV-1 incidence should facilitate application of the LAg-Avidity EIA for worldwide use.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring the HIV/AIDS epidemic: approaches and challenges.

              In this article, the author reviews current approaches and methods for measuring the scope of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic and their strengths and weaknesses. In recent years, various public health agencies have revised statistical estimates of the scope of the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The author considers the reasons underlying these revisions. New sources of data for estimating HIV prevalence have become available, such as nationally representative probability-based surveys. New technologies such as biomarkers that indicate when persons became infected are now used to determine HIV incidence rates. The author summarizes the main sources of errors and problems with these and other approaches and discusses opportunities for improving their reliability. Changing methods and data sources present new challenges, because incidence and prevalence estimates produced at different points in time are not directly comparable with each other, which complicates assessment of time trends. The methodological changes help explain the changes in global statistics. As methods and data sources continue to improve, the development of statistical tools for better assessing the extent to which changes in HIV/AIDS statistics can be attributed to changes in methodology versus real changes in the underlying epidemic is an important challenge.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bunmineges@gmail.com
                Journal
                J Int AIDS Soc
                J Int AIDS Soc
                10.1002/(ISSN)1758-2652
                JIA2
                Journal of the International AIDS Society
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1758-2652
                22 February 2021
                February 2021
                : 24
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/jia2.v24.2 )
                : e25669
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Laboratory services and HSS Department FHI 360 Abuja Nigeria
                [ 2 ] Global Public Health Department IHR Strengthening Programme Public Health England Abuja Nigeria
                [ 3 ] Laboratory Services Department University of Uyo Teaching Hospital Uyo Nigeria
                [ 4 ] Prevention, Care and Treatment Department FHI 360 Abuja Nigeria
                [ 5 ] Monitoring and Evaluation Department FHI 360 Abuja Nigeria
                [ 6 ] Office of the HIV/AIDS and TB United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Abuja Nigeria
                [ 7 ] Program Management Department FHI 360 Abuja Nigeria
                [ 8 ] Infectious Diseases and Health Systems FHI 360 Durham NC USA
                [ 9 ] FHI 360 Durham NC USA
                [ 10 ] College of Health Sciences University of Ghana Accra Ghana
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Corresponding author: Olubunmi R Negedu‐Momoh, Public Health England, Global Public Health department, IHR strengthening programme Nigeria, British High Commission, Abuja, Nigeria. Tel: +2348035997317. ( bunmineges@ 123456gmail.com )

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-8177
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-1397
                Article
                JIA225669
                10.1002/jia2.25669
                7900440
                33619853
                cb3c409f-fb6f-4e16-804d-f9aa4ec973ce
                © 2021 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 May 2020
                : 31 December 2020
                : 13 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 8, Words: 6176
                Funding
                Funded by: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000200;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.7 mode:remove_FC converted:22.02.2021

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                hiv‐1,incidence,recent infection,limiting antigen avidity,viral load,nigeria

                Comments

                Comment on this article