0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emotions and performance in rugby

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study investigated emotion–performance relationships in rugby union. We identified which emotions rugby players experienced and the extent to which these emotions were associated with performance, considering how emotions unfold over the course of a game, and whether the game was played at home or away.

          Methods

          Data were gathered from 22 professional male rugby union players using auto-confrontation interviews to help identify situations within games when players experienced intense emotions. We assessed the intensity of emotions experienced before each discrete performance and therefore could assess the emotion–performance relationship within a competition.

          Results

          Players identified experiencing intense emotions at 189 time-points. Experts in rugby union rated the quality of each performance at these 189 time-points on a visual analog scale. A Linear Mixed Effects model to investigate emotion–performance relationships found additive effects of game location, game time, and emotions on individual performance.

          Conclusion

          Results showed 7 different pre-performance emotions, with high anxiety and anger associating with poor performance. Future research should continue to investigate emotion–performance relationships during performance using video-assisted recall and use a measure of performance that has face validity for players and coaches alike.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          How Emotions Influence Performance in Competitive Sports

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.

            Using a process model of emotion, a distinction between antecedent-focused and response-focused emotion regulation is proposed. To test this distinction, 120 participants were shown a disgusting film while their experiential, behavioral, and physiological responses were recorded. Participants were told to either (a) think about the film in such a way that they would feel nothing (reappraisal, a form of antecedent-focused emotion regulation), (b) behave in such a way that someone watching them would not know they were feeling anything (suppression, a form of response-focused emotion regulation), or (c) watch the film (a control condition). Compared with the control condition, both reappraisal and suppression were effective in reducing emotion-expressive behavior. However, reappraisal decreased disgust experience, whereas suppression increased sympathetic activation. These results suggest that these 2 emotion regulatory processes may have different adaptive consequences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise.

              To assess which subjective scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Borg CR10 (Borg) scale, or the Likert scale (LS), if any, is decidedly more reproducible and sensitive to change in the assessment of symptoms. Prospective clinical study. Exercise laboratory. Twenty-three physically active male subjects (mean +/- SD age of 30 +/- 4 years old) were recruited. Each subject attended the exercise laboratory on four occasions at intervals of 1 week. Three subjective scales were used: (1) the VAS (continuous scale); (2) the Borg scale (12 fixed points); and (3) the Likert scale (LS; 5 fixed points). Four identical submaximal tests were given (2 min at 60% maximum oxygen uptake [VO(2)max] and 6 min at 70% VO(2)max). Two tests were undertaken to assess the reproducibility of scores that were obtained with each subjective scale. Two other tests were undertaken to assess the sensitivity of each scale to a change in symptom perception: a double-blind treatment with propranolol, 80 mg, (ie, active therapy; to increase the sensation of breathlessness and general fatigue during exercise) or matching placebo. The subjective scale scores were measured at 1 min 30 s, 5 min 30 s, and 7 min 15 s of exercise. Reproducibility was defined as the proportion of total variance (ie, between-subject plus within-subject variance) explained by the between-subject variance given as a percentage. Sensitivity was defined as the effect of the active drug therapy over the variation within subjects. Overall, the VAS performed best in terms of reproducibility for breathlessness and general fatigue, with reproducibility coefficients as high as 78%. For sensitivity, the VAS was best for breathlessness (ratio, 2.7) and the Borg scale was most sensitive for general fatigue (ratio, 3.0). The relationships between the respective psychological and physiologic variables were reasonably stable throughout the testing procedure, with overall typical correlations of 0.73 to 0.82 This study suggests that subjective scales can reproducibly measure symptoms during steady-state exercise and can detect the effect of a drug intervention. The VAS and Borg scales appear to be the best subjective scales for this purpose.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Sport Health Sci
                J Sport Health Sci
                Journal of Sport and Health Science
                Shanghai University of Sport
                2095-2546
                2213-2961
                25 May 2016
                November 2019
                25 May 2016
                : 8
                : 6
                : 595-600
                Affiliations
                [a ]SPMS (EA 4180), UBFC, Dijon 21078, France
                [b ]Laboratory for Vulnerabilities and Innovation in Sport (L-VIS, EA 7428), University of Lyon 1, Villeurbanne 69622, France
                [c ]Institute of Sport, Faculty of Education, Health and Well-being, University of Wolverhampton, Ws13BD, UK
                [d ]Faculty of Sport Sciences, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims 51096, France
                [e ]Research Team of Psychology of Ages of Life (EA 2114), University François Rabelais, Tours 37041, France
                [f ]CETAPS (EA 3832), Normandie Université, Mont Saint Aignan 76 821, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. mickael.campo@ 123456u-bourgogne.fr
                Article
                S2095-2546(16)30036-9
                10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.007
                6834972
                cb698b7a-c537-4ab7-a378-66b733e4f2ce
                © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 March 2015
                : 29 June 2015
                : 30 January 2016
                Categories
                Regular Paper

                emotion,game location,game time,linear mixed effects model,multilevel analysis,performance assessment,team sport

                Comments

                Comment on this article