For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
23
views
89
references
 Top references
cited by
18
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      350
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Magnetic resonance image-guided versus ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of breast cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been used for more than ten years, primarily in the treatment of liver and prostate cancers. HIFU has the advantages of precise cancer ablation and excellent protection of healthy tissue. Breast cancer is a common cancer in women. HIFU therapy, in combination with other therapies, has the potential to improve both oncologic and cosmetic outcomes for breast cancer patients by providing a curative therapy that conserves mammary shape. Currently, HIFU therapy is not commonly used in breast cancer treatment, and efforts to promote the application of HIFU is expected. In this article, we compare different image-guided models for HIFU and reviewed the status, drawbacks, and potential of HIFU therapy for breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer

          Bernard Fisher, Stewart Anderson, John Bryant … (2002)
          New England Journal of Medicine, 347(16), 1233-1241
          Article 0 comments Cited 1151 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours.

            James Kennedy (2005)
            Traditionally, surgery has been the only cure for many solid tumours. Technological advances have catalysed a shift from open surgery towards less invasive techniques. Laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive techniques continue to evolve, but for decades high-intensity focused ultrasound has promised to deliver the ultimate objective - truly non-invasive tumour ablation. Only now, however, with recent improvements in imaging, has this objective finally emerged as a real clinical possibility.
            Article 0 comments Cited 259 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial.

              Harry Bartelink, Jean-Claude Horiot, Philip M Poortmans … (2007)
              To investigate the long-term impact of a boost radiation dose of 16 Gy on local control, fibrosis, and overall survival for patients with stage I and II breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving therapy. A total of 5,318 patients with microscopically complete excision followed by whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomly assigned to receive either a boost dose of 16 Gy (2,661 patients) or no boost dose (2,657 patients), with a median follow-up of 10.8 years. The median age was 55 years. Local recurrence was reported as the first treatment failure in 278 patients with no boost versus 165 patients with boost; at 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the no boost and the boost group, respectively (P < .0001). The hazard ratio of local recurrence was 0.59 (0.46 to 0.76) in favor of the boost, with no statistically significant interaction per age group. The absolute risk reduction at 10 years per age group was the largest in patients
              Article 0 comments Cited 175 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Chin J Cancer
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Chin J Cancer
                Journal ID (publisher-id): CJC
                Title: Chinese Journal of Cancer
                Publisher: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
                ISSN (Print): 1000-467X
                ISSN (Electronic): 1944-446X
                Publication date (Print): August 2013
                Volume: 32
                Issue: 8
                Pages: 441-452
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China;
                [2 ]Department of Medical Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China.
                Author notes
                Corresponding Authors: Pei-Hong Wu, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Medical Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China. Tel: +86-20-87343272; Fax: +86-20-87343272; Email: wuph@ 123456sysucc.org.cn .
                Article
                Publisher ID: cjc-32-08-441
                DOI: 10.5732/cjc.012.10104
                PMC ID: 3845578
                PubMed ID: 23237221
                SO-VID: cbab421b-8015-4a78-b5b0-c5afe885fffe
                Copyright © Chinese Journal of Cancer
                License:

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.

                History
                Date received : 30 August 2012
                Date revision received : 9 October 2012
                Date accepted : 21 October 2012
                Categories
                Subject: Review

                Keywords: high-intensity focused ultrasound,breast cancer,magnetic resonance imaging,ultrasound,ablation
                Data availability:
                Keywords: high-intensity focused ultrasound, breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, ablation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content350

                See all similar

                Cited by18

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors1,066

                See all reference authors