2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Dexamethasone for Light-Chain Amyloidosis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          Oral melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex) were considered a standard of care in light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. In the past decade, bortezomib has been increasingly used in combination with alkylating agents and dexamethasone. We prospectively compared the efficacy and safety of MDex and MDex with the addition of bortezomib (BMDex).

          METHODS

          This was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Patients were stratified according to cardiac stage. Patients with advanced cardiac stage (stage IIIb) amyloidosis were not eligible. The primary end point was hematologic response rate at 3 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01277016 .

          RESULTS

          A total of 109 patients, 53 in the BMDex and 56 in the MDex group, received ≥ 1 dose of therapy (from January 2011 to February 2016). Hematologic response rate at 3 months was higher in the BMDex arm (79% v 52%; P = .002). Higher rates of very good partial or complete response rates (64% v 39%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.47; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.71) and improved overall survival, with a 2-fold decrease in mortality rate (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.90), were observed in the BMDex arm. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (the most common being cytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and heart failure) were more common in the BMDex arm, occurring in 20% versus 10% of cycles performed.

          CONCLUSION

          BMDex improved hematologic response rate and overall survival. To our knowledge, this is the first time a controlled study has demonstrated a survival advantage in AL amyloidosis. BMDex should be considered a new standard of care for AL amyloidosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            A prospective observational study of 915 patients with systemic AL amyloidosis treated with upfront bortezomib

            This article reports the largest series of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis to date treated with first-line bortezomib. With relatively mature follow-up, the data indicate the importance of a stringent dFLC response (difference in involved and uninvolved light chains) as a predictor of prolonged response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of melphalan and high-dose dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in patients with AL (primary) amyloidosis who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation.

              The most efficient therapeutic approach for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) is autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); however, the toxicity of ASCT limits its feasibility to a minority of patients. Patients ineligible for ASCT are usually treated with standard oral melphalan and prednisone, but the response rate to this regimen is unsatisfactory, and time to response is long. High-dose dexamethasone provides a rapid response time in patients with AL. We evaluated the combination of oral melphalan and high-dose dexamethasone (M-Dex) in 46 patients with AL ineligible for ASCT. Thirty-one (67%) achieved a hematologic response and 15 (33%) a complete remission. In 22 (48%) of the responsive patients functional improvement of the organs involved was observed. Five patients (11%) experienced severe adverse events, 3 required hospitalization, and no treatment-related deaths were observed. M-Dex represents a feasible and effective therapeutic option for patients with advanced AL who are ineligible for ASCT.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                JCO
                American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                July 30 2020
                : JCO.20.01285
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
                [2 ]Hopital Huriez Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille, France
                [3 ]Immunohematology Unit, Hospital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
                [4 ]Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy
                [5 ]Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [7 ]Princess Alexandra Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [8 ]Department of Hemato-oncology, University Hospital, Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
                [9 ]Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France
                [10 ]Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Limoges, France
                [11 ]Medical Department V, Amyloidosis Centre, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
                [12 ]St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [13 ]Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
                [14 ]Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
                [15 ]University Hospital of Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Salamanc, Institute of Cancer Molecular and Cellular Biology, Salamanca, Spain
                [16 ]University College London Medical School, Royal Free Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom
                [17 ]Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center “Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San Matteo,” Pavia, Italy
                [18 ]Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry Service, “Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San Matteo,” Pavia, Italy
                [19 ]University of Torino, Torino, Italy
                [20 ]Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [21 ]Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
                [22 ]Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
                Article
                10.1200/JCO.20.01285
                32730181
                cc38b05b-1bde-49f9-aecc-91b49a62370a
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article