16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phase II trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer

      other

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1, oral fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug tegafur combined with two modulators, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine and potassium oxonate, to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) patients. Patients who had pathologically proven pancreatic cancer with metastatic lesions were eligible candidates for entry into the study. S-1 was given orally (30 mg m −2) b.i.d. for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg m −2) was given on days 8 and 15. The cycle was repeated every 21 days. We enrolled 33 MPC patients. The median number of cycles was eight (range 1–20). Grade 3–4 toxicities were leucopenia (33%), neutropenia (55%), anaemia (9%), thrombocytopenia (15%), anorexia (6%), fever (9%), and interstitial pneumonia (6%). Objective responses were obtained in 16 patients (one complete response and 15 partial responses; response rate, 48%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 33–65). Median survival and 1-year survival rate were 12.5 months (95% CI, 5.9–19.1) and 54% (95% CI, 36–72), respectively. Combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 was well tolerated and yielded a significantly high response rate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators.

          We have focused our attention on the development of a novel form of a tegafur-based [FT; a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] antitumor agent. We have used two biochemical and pharmacological modulators of 5-FU to improve its overall activity. To potentiate the antitumor activity of FT, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) was used as a potent reversible inhibitor of 5-FU degradation. The reduction of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, induced in the host by 5-FU, was modulated by potassium oxonate (Oxo), an inhibitor of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase that catalyzes the phosphorylation of 5-FU, a process believed to be responsible for the toxic effects of 5-FU. When CDHP and FT were simultaneously given orally to Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats in various molar ratios, the antitumor effect of FT was significantly potentiated by the combination consisting of at least a 0.2 versus 1 molar ratio of CDHP to FT, respectively. This augmentation of an antitumor activity was supported by potent and prolonged inhibition of dihydrouracil dehydrogenase activity (5-FU degrading activities) in the liver of tumor-bearing rats after oral CDHP (0.2:0.8 molar ratio) and furthermore by elevation and over 12 h retention of 5-FU levels in the tumors following combined administration of FT and CDHP at a molar ratio of 1:0.4, respectively. Moreover, to reduce the severe GI injury and subsequent loss of body weight, observed in parallel with an increased antitumor efficacy, Oxo was given orally to Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats and nude rats xenografted with H-81 human gastric carcinoma, during consecutive administration of the FT-CDHP mixture. Combined treatment with Oxo and FT (1:2 molar ratio) supplemented with 0.4 molar CDHP resulted in protection of body weight loss without affecting the high antitumor efficacy of the FT-CDHP mixture. When [2-14C]FT plus CDHP was administered with Oxo, the 14C-labeled fluoronucleotide content was objectively decreased in the GI tract of the tumor-bearing rats but not in the tumor and bone marrow, which supports our initial hypothesis. Based on these promising data, we propose a suitable formulation of a FT-based anticancer drug, called S-1, and consisting of FT, CDHP and Oxo at a 1:0.4:1 molar ratio and showing tumor-selective cytotoxicity of 5-FU.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer.

            In certain patients with pancreatic and biliary cancer, chemotherapy may relieve tumour-related symptoms, improve quality of life and possibly prolong survival. The extent of these improvements is not completely known in spite of the extensive use of this treatment modality. The aim of this study was to estimate any gain in the quantity and quality of life produced by chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic and biliary cancer. Between January 1991 and February 1995, 90 eligible patients with pancreatic or biliary cancer were randomized to either chemotherapy in addition to best supportive care or to best supportive care. Chemotherapy was allowed in the latter group if the supportive measures did not lead to palliation. Chemotherapy was either sequential 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with etoposide (FELv) or, in elderly and poor performance patients, the same regimen without etoposide (FLv). Quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument. Mean scale scores in the QLQ-C30 improved more often/deteriorated less frequently in the chemotherapy group than in the best supportive care group. More patients in the chemotherapy group (36%, 17/49) had an improved or prolonged high quality of life for a minimum period of 4 months compared to those in the best supportive care group (10%, 4/41, P < 0.01). Overall survival was significantly longer in the chemotherapy group (median 6 vs. 2.5 months, P < 0.01). Also, the quality-adjusted survival time was longer for patients randomized to chemotherapy (median 4 vs. 1 months, P < 0.01). The effects were seen both in pancreatic and biliary cancer. The results show that chemotherapy can add to both quantity and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. The number of patients who benefit from treatment is, however, still limited; for this reason careful selection before, and close monitoring during, treatment are necessary.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients.

              S-1 is a novel oral anticancer drug, composed of tegafur (FT), gimestat (CDHP) and otastat potassium (Oxo) in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1, based on the biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). CDHP inhibits dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme which degrades 5-FU, and maintains prolonged 5-FU concentrations in the blood and tumours. Oxo is distributed in the gastrointestinal tract at a high concentration after oral administration and alleviates gastrointestinal toxicity due to 5-FU. S-1 improves the tumour-selective toxicity of 5-FU by the actions of two modulators, CDHP and Oxo. We conducted a late phase II clinical trial of S-1 as an open trial in patients with advanced gastric cancer, to confirm its antitumour effect and adverse reactions. 51 patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in the trial. S-1 was administered orally twice daily after meals, at a standard dose of 80 mg/m2/day. One course consisted of consecutive administration for 28 days and 14 days' rest. Administration was repeated over four courses. A complete response was obtained in 1 patient and partial responses in 24 patients, producing a response rate of 49% (25/51) (95% confidence interval (CI) 35.9-62.3%). The incidence of adverse reactions was 78% (40/51) and that of adverse reactions of grades 3 and 4 was 20%. Adverse reactions of grades 3 and 4 included a decrease in the haematocrit, leucopenia, granulocytopenia, diarrhoea, malaise and proteinuria. No serious unexpected adverse reactions were observed. In conclusion, S-1 was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                23 May 2006
                30 May 2006
                05 June 2006
                : 94
                : 11
                : 1575-1579
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
                [2 ]Research Center Hospital for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences Chiba, Japan
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence: yama.take@ 123456faculty.chiba-u.jp
                Article
                6603168
                10.1038/sj.bjc.6603168
                2361295
                16721372
                cc5dde23-e5b8-4d1c-8008-cdf645d1ce3c
                Copyright 2006, Cancer Research UK
                History
                : 13 February 2006
                : 10 April 2006
                Categories
                Clinical Studies

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                s-1,gemcitabine,phase ii study,metastatic pancreatic cancer,high response
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                s-1, gemcitabine, phase ii study, metastatic pancreatic cancer, high response

                Comments

                Comment on this article