7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Personal Protective Equipment: A Pandora’s Box

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Countries all over the world writhing under the wrath of coronavirus face not only the challenge of protecting their population but the tougher challenge of protecting their healthcare workers (HCWs) dealing with the patient population. This pandemic has put unprecedented pressure on global healthcare systems, with personal protective equipment (PPE) being the most notable one. Apart from the challenge of procurement of PPE, the major challenge is rationalizing the use of PPE in this war against corona virus disease 19 (COVID19). Using PPE comes with its own set of problems such as extreme exhaustion, rashes, inability to consume food, or use washroom which can result in clouding of judgment and breach of infection barrier. Making PPE user-friendly and limiting the interaction of HCW with COVID19 patients coupled with the use of robotics, telemedicine, and other innovations is the need of the hour.

          How to cite this article

          Chawla G, Abrol N, Kakkar K. Personal Protective Equipment: A Pandora’s Box. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(5):371–372.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          COVID-19: protecting health-care workers

          The Lancet (2020)
          Worldwide, as millions of people stay at home to minimise transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, health-care workers prepare to do the exact opposite. They will go to clinics and hospitals, putting themselves at high risk from COVID-2019. Figures from China's National Health Commission show that more than 3300 health-care workers have been infected as of early March and, according to local media, by the end of February at least 22 had died. In Italy, 20% of responding health-care workers were infected, and some have died. Reports from medical staff describe physical and mental exhaustion, the torment of difficult triage decisions, and the pain of losing patients and colleagues, all in addition to the infection risk. As the pandemic accelerates, access to personal protective equipment (PPE) for health workers is a key concern. Medical staff are prioritised in many countries, but PPE shortages have been described in the most affected facilities. Some medical staff are waiting for equipment while already seeing patients who may be infected or are supplied with equipment that might not meet requirements. Alongside concerns for their personal safety, health-care workers are anxious about passing the infection to their families. Health-care workers who care for elderly parents or young children will be drastically affected by school closures, social distancing policies, and disruption in the availability of food and other essentials. Health-care systems globally could be operating at more than maximum capacity for many months. But health-care workers, unlike ventilators or wards, cannot be urgently manufactured or run at 100% occupancy for long periods. It is vital that governments see workers not simply as pawns to be deployed, but as human individuals. In the global response, the safety of health-care workers must be ensured. Adequate provision of PPE is just the first step; other practical measures must be considered, including cancelling non-essential events to prioritise resources; provision of food, rest, and family support; and psychological support. Presently, health-care workers are every country's most valuable resource. © 2020 Denis Lovrovic/AFP/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            COVID-19: A Call for Physical Scientists and Engineers

            The COVID-19 pandemic is one of those global challenges that transcends territorial, political, ideological, religious, cultural, and certainly academic boundaries. Public health and healthcare workers are at the frontline, working to contain and to mitigate the spread of this disease. Although intervening biological and immunological responses against viral infection may seem far from the physical sciences and engineering that typically work with inanimate objects, there actually is much that can—and should—be done to help in this global crisis. In this Perspective, we convert the basics of infectious respiratory diseases and viruses into physical sciences and engineering intuitions, and through this exercise, we present examples of questions, hypotheses, and research needs identified based on clinicians’ experiences. We hope researchers in the physical sciences and engineering will proactively study these challenges, develop new hypotheses, define new research areas, and work with biological researchers, healthcare, and public health professionals to create user-centered solutions and to inform the general public, so that we can better address the many challenges associated with the transmission and spread of infectious respiratory diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Minimise nosocomial spread of 2019-nCoV when treating acute respiratory failure

              The three flu pandemics of the 20th century, in 1918, 1957, and 1968, 1 caused millions of deaths, mainly from acute respiratory failure. More recently, outbreaks of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, in 2002, and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, in 2012, have been characterised by human-to-human transmission and high incidence of acute respiratory failure. The growing alarm for the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) spreading from China brings back the spectre of the rapidly diffusing pandemics of the past. 2 Non-invasive ventilation is an effective and common treatment for patients with mild to moderate acute respiratory failure. 3 It is associated with mortality reduction compared to either spontaneous breathing or mechanical ventilation by endotracheal tube as supported by several randomised trials. 4 Emergency departments and intensive care units are increasingly applying non-invasive ventilation. 3 When used to treat acute respiratory failure, non-invasive ventilation is applied to the patient mainly by face mask or helmet. 3 Since coronavirus diffusion takes place by droplet transmission, 2 aerosolisation during hospital procedures like intubation or bronchoscopy might represent a big concern, exposing other patients and health-care staff to an increased risk of infection, as during the flu pandemia. 1 Aerosolisation with nosocomial amplification of the infection can also potentially happen around the face mask during non-invasive ventilation, as demonstrated in different simulation studies. 5 Accordingly, the efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation during viral pandemic infection are still debated. However, during pandemics, the number of intensive care unit beds for mechanical ventilation through tracheal intubation could rapidly become insufficient, 1 whereas non-invasive ventilation can be offered also outside the intensive care unit. 4 To increase safety during non-invasive ventilation, use of a helmet as a non-invasive ventilation interface can be considered to avoid aerosolisation when the helmet is connected to the ventilator without air dispersion through a spring-valve; unfortunately, a helmet costs more than most face masks. Accordingly, when facing a patient with acute respiratory failure of suspected viral nature (and, above all, during pandemics), we recommend the adoption of helmets and avoidance of face masks as the non-invasive ventilation interface. Moreover, we suggest that manufacturers should develop cheap and safe non-invasive ventilation interfaces to be used during viral pandemics. © 2020 Barcroft Media/Contributor/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Crit Care Med
                Indian J Crit Care Med
                IJCCM
                Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
                Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
                0972-5229
                1998-359X
                May 2020
                : 24
                : 5
                : 371-372
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesia, Government Medical College, Pali, Rajasthan, India
                [3 ]Department of Anesthesia, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
                Author notes
                Nupur Abrol, Department of Anesthesia, Government Medical College, Pali, Rajasthan, India, Phone: +91 8800211100, e-mail: nupur.abrol@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23443
                7358863
                32728335
                cc7ab584-08c8-4b53-bc08-441979267df5
                Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

                © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                coronavirus,covid-19,healthcare workers,personal protective equipment

                Comments

                Comment on this article