6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      No Consistent Simulated Trends in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation for the Past 6,000 Years

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is a key feature of the North Atlantic with global ocean impacts. The AMOC's response to past changes in forcings during the Holocene provides important context for the coming centuries. Here, we investigate AMOC trends using an emerging set of transient simulations using multiple global climate models for the past 6,000 years. Although some models show changes, no consistent trend in overall AMOC strength during the mid‐to‐late Holocene emerges from the ensemble. We interpret this result to suggest no overall change in AMOC, which fits with our assessment of available proxy reconstructions. The decadal variability of the AMOC does not change in ensemble during the mid‐ and late‐Holocene. There are interesting AMOC changes seen in the early Holocene, but their nature depends a lot on which inputs are used to drive the experiment.

          Plain Language Summary

          The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is a deep ocean circulation system that is both important for climate and vulnerable to climate changes. Here we use a set of multiple climate models to look at how the AMOC responded to changes in climate drivers over the past few thousand years. The changes are only small in all of the models, and do not agree in their direction. The AMOC naturally varies on decadal timescales, but we do not see any strong trends in its variability either. We consider these simulations to indicate that the overall AMOC has not changed over the past 6,000 years, which fits with recent data reconstructions.

          Key Points

          • A multi‐model ensemble of Holocene transient simulations by general circulation models has been assembled

          • Although some models show changes, no consistent trend in overall Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) strength during the mid‐to‐late Holocene emerges from the ensemble

          • We interpret this result to suggest no overall change in AMOC, which fits with our assessment of available proxy reconstructions

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transient simulation of last deglaciation with a new mechanism for Bolling-Allerod warming.

              We conducted the first synchronously coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model simulation from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Bølling-Allerød (BA) warming. Our model reproduces several major features of the deglacial climate evolution, suggesting a good agreement in climate sensitivity between the model and observations. In particular, our model simulates the abrupt BA warming as a transient response of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) to a sudden termination of freshwater discharge to the North Atlantic before the BA. In contrast to previous mechanisms that invoke AMOC multiple equilibrium and Southern Hemisphere climate forcing, we propose that the BA transition is caused by the superposition of climatic responses to the transient CO(2) forcing, the AMOC recovery from Heinrich Event 1, and an AMOC overshoot.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Geophysical Research Letters
                Geophysical Research Letters
                0094-8276
                1944-8007
                May 28 2023
                May 11 2023
                May 28 2023
                : 50
                : 10
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Geography University College London London UK
                [2 ] Max‐Planck‐Institut für Meteorologie Hamburg Germany
                [3 ] Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement‐IPSL Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
                [4 ] School of Earth and Sustainability Northern Arizona University AZ Flagstaff USA
                [5 ] School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [6 ] Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
                [7 ] Lyell Centre Heriot‐Watt University Edinburgh UK
                [8 ] A. M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Russia
                [9 ] Alfred‐Wegener‐Institut Helmholtz‐Zentrum für Polar‐und Meeresforschung Bremerhaven Germany
                [10 ] Department of Geography University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
                [11 ] Department of Geosciences University of Arizona AZ Tucson USA
                [12 ] National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) CO Boulder USA
                [13 ] Institute of Geosciences Kiel University Kiel Germany
                [14 ] Department of Physical Geography Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
                [15 ] Bolin Centre for Climate Research Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
                Article
                10.1029/2023GL103078
                ccb915ec-2c4b-4b20-a846-c43f7f2ec77f
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article