170
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do the Best Teachers Get the Best Ratings?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We review recent studies that asked: do college students learn relatively more from teachers whom they rate highly on student evaluation forms? Recent studies measured learning at two-time points. When learning was measured with a test at the end of the course, the teachers who got the highest ratings were the ones who contributed the most to learning. But when learning was measured as performance in subsequent related courses, the teachers who had received relatively low ratings appeared to have been most effective. We speculate about why these effects occurred: making a course difficult in productive ways may decrease ratings but enhance learning. Despite their limitations, we do not suggest abandoning student ratings, but do recommend that student evaluation scores should not be the sole basis for evaluating college teaching and they should be recognized for what they are.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

          Taking a memory test not only assesses what one knows, but also enhances later retention, a phenomenon known as the testing effect. We studied this effect with educationally relevant materials and investigated whether testing facilitates learning only because tests offer an opportunity to restudy material. In two experiments, students studied prose passages and took one or three immediate free-recall tests, without feedback, or restudied the material the same number of times as the students who received tests. Students then took a final retention test 5 min, 2 days, or 1 week later. When the final test was given after 5 min, repeated studying improved recall relative to repeated testing. However, on the delayed tests, prior testing produced substantially greater retention than studying, even though repeated studying increased students' confidence in their ability to remember the material. Testing is a powerful means of improving learning, not just assessing it.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                25 April 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 570
                Affiliations
                Department of Psychology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Lynne D. Roberts, Curtin University, Australia

                Reviewed by: Sherri Horner, Bowling Green State University, USA; Ronny Scherer, Centre for Educational Measurement at the University of Oslo, Norway

                *Correspondence: Nate Kornell, nkornell@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00570
                4842911
                27199807
                ccfaf4da-0369-497a-8523-8ab48e1e9c1d
                Copyright © 2016 Kornell and Hausman.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 21 January 2016
                : 06 April 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 63, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: James S. McDonnell Foundation 10.13039/100000913
                Award ID: 220020371
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                student evaluations of teaching,teacher ratings,long-term learning,grades,ratings

                Comments

                Comment on this article